CVE-2026-47155: vLLM: Artifact Pin Decay in vLLM allows pinned deployments to load unpinned code, weights, and processors
Summary
vLLM's revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision.
This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision.
Details
The expected invariant is:
> When a vLLM operator supplies a model or code revision pin, every code, config, processor, weight file, side weight, and same-repository subfolder artifact loaded as part of that model should resolve under that pin unless vLLM exposes and enforces a separate explicit pin for that artifact.
Current main was verified affected at commit 3795d7acf431980e62e738493f437ae2a51549da.
Affected source boundaries:
- vllm/modelexecutor/models/registry.py:1045-1051 and :1058-1064 - tryresolvetransformers() passes revision=modelconfig.revision and trustremotecode=modelconfig.trustremotecode, but omits coderevision=modelconfig.coderevision for external automap dynamic module imports. - vllm/modelexecutor/modelloader/ggufloader.py:58-60 - The direct-file GGUF form repo/file.gguf calls hfhubdownload(repoid=repoid, filename=filename) without passing revision. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/roberta.py:203-209 - BGE-M3 secondary sparse and ColBERT side weights are declared with revision=None. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/kimik25.py:111-114 - Kimi-K2.5 calls cachedgetimageprocessor() without passing modelconfig.revision. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/kimiaudio.py:92-95 - Kimi-Audio loads Whisper config from the whisper-large-v3 subfolder without a revision argument. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/kimiaudio.py:425-430 - Kimi-Audio declares same-repository whisper-large-v3 secondary weights with revision=None. - vllm/modelexecutor/modelloader/defaultloader.py:287-301 - The default loader preserves modelconfig.revision for the primary source, then consumes model-supplied secondary sources as declared.
The strongest example is Kimi-Audio: the primary moonshotai/Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct weights preserve the configured model revision, but the same-repository whisper-large-v3 audio tower config/weights do not. A pinned Kimi-Audio deployment can therefore load the Whisper subfolder outside the audited revision.
This report does not claim a trustremotecode=False bypass, unauthenticated RCE, or real artifact compromise. The issue is improper propagation of explicit artifact pins across supported loader paths.
Impact
Affected users are operators who pin vLLM model deployments to a reviewed Hugging Face revision for safety review, provenance, rollback, or reproducibility. The impact is that the pin does not reliably describe the full set of artifacts vLLM serves. Even when the operator selects an audited revision, vLLM can resolve behavior-affecting secondary artifacts from the repository default branch or another mutable ref.
Depending on the model path, the unpinned artifact can be dynamic model code, a GGUF file, an image processor, retrieval side weights, or the same-repository Kimi-Audio Whisper subfolder weights/config.
This breaks the operational guarantee of a pinned deployment: "serve the exact artifact set I reviewed." A later change to an unpinned secondary artifact can alter model behavior without changing the operator's configured revision, making review, rollback, incident response, and audit records unreliable.
Occurrences
- vllm/modelexecutor/models/kimik25.py L111-L114 — Kimi-K2.5 loads its image processor with cachedgetimageprocessor() but does not pass self.ctx.modelconfig.revision. The processor can therefore resolve from the default repository revision even when the model deployment is pinned. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/kimiaudio.py L425-L430 — Kimi-Audio declares same-repository whisper-large-v3 secondary weights with revision=None. A pinned Kimi-Audio deployment can therefore load the Whisper audio tower weights from an unpinned/default revision. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/kimiaudio.py L92-L95 — Kimi-Audio loads Whisper config from the same repository's whisper-large-v3 subfolder without passing the top-level model revision. The config for this behavior-affecting subcomponent can be resolved outside the audited model revision. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/registry.py L1058-L1064 — The later dynamic model-class resolution repeats the same pin-decay pattern: it forwards revision and trustremotecode, but omits coderevision. This means an operator-provided code pin is not enforced at the dynamic module loader boundary. - vllm/modelexecutor/modelloader/ggufloader.py L58-L60 — The direct GGUF form repo/file.gguf calls hfhubdownload(repoid=repoid, filename=filename) without passing modelconfig.revision. A deployment that pins the model revision can therefore resolve this GGUF file from the repository default revision. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/registry.py L1045-L1051 — trygetclassfromdynamicmodule() is called for external automap config/model classes with revision=modelconfig.revision, but without forwarding modelconfig.coderevision. When --code-revision is set, this dynamic module resolution can still fall back to the default code revision instead of the audited code revision. - vllm/modelexecutor/models/roberta.py L203-L209 — BgeM3EmbeddingModel creates same-repository secondary sparse/ColBERT weight sources with revision=None. The primary model revision is not propagated to these side weights, so they can be downloaded outside the operator-selected model revision.
Fixes
This was fixed in: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/42616
Originally filed via huntr: https://huntr.com/bounties/3f1e24c0-87d2-4f6c-a705-820f380879ac.
The vLLM maintainer (Russell Bryant) redirected the report to the private GHSA channel. Offline proof bundle (vllmartifactpindecaybundleverify.py + bundle-verification-20260430T143506Z.json) is available upon request.
Other sources
vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.22.0, vLLM's revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision. This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-47155?
The severity of CVE-2026-47155 is rated as medium, with a score of 6.5.
What systems are affected by CVE-2026-47155?
CVE-2026-47155 affects deployments utilizing pip and vLLM where revision pinning controls are improperly applied.
How do I fix CVE-2026-47155?
To mitigate CVE-2026-47155, ensure that all artifacts are securely managed and revise dependency controls to prevent dynamic code loading.
What impact does CVE-2026-47155 have on deployments?
CVE-2026-47155 can lead to the unintended execution of untrusted code and the improper use of model artifacts.
When was CVE-2026-47155 published?
CVE-2026-47155 was published on June 10, 2026.