CVE-2026-50279: Craft CMS: Authorship spoofing in `entries/save-entry` via pre-check/post-mutation authorization gap

Summary

EntriesController::actionSaveEntry() performs entry-edit permission checks before request-controlled author changes are applied to the model. The subsequent author mutation path accepts attacker-supplied authors / author parameters and allows the change when the current user is one of the old authors. Because the controller does not re-run authorization after mutating the author list, a low-privileged user can reassign an entry’s authorship to another user without holding the dedicated peer-author-change permission.

Details The control flow begins in EntriesController.php:249. actionSaveEntry() loads the entry and enforces edit permissions before calling populateEntryModel():

php public function actionSaveEntry(bool $duplicate = false): ?Response { ... $entry = $this->editableEntry($this->request->getBodyParam('entryId'), $siteId); ... $this->enforceEditEntryPermissions($entry, $duplicate); ... $this->populateEntryModel($entry); ... $success = Craft::$app->getElements()->saveElement($entry); }

The attacker-controlled source is in EntriesController.php:588:

php $entry->setAttributesFromRequest(arrayfilter([ 'authorIds' => $this->request->getBodyParam('authors') ?? $this->request->getBodyParam('author') ?? $entry->getAuthorId() ?? static::currentUser()->id, ]));

Entry::setAttributesFromRequest() in Entry.php:1124 extracts the new author IDs and applies them if canChangeAuthor() returns true:

php if ( ($authorIds !== null || $authorId !== null) && $this->canChangeAuthor() ) { $this->oldAuthorIds = $oldAuthorIds; $this->setAuthorIds($authorIds); }

canChangeAuthor() at Entry.php:2789 allows the author change when the current user can view peer entries and is already one of the existing authors:

php return ( empty($authorIds) || inarray($user->id, $authorIds) || $user->can("changeAuthorForPeerEntries:$section->uid") );

After the author list is mutated, the controller does not re-check authorization.

This closes the exploit chain:

1. External source: authenticated request to entries/save-entry with attacker-controlled authors[]. 2. Trust boundary failure: authorization is checked on the pre-mutation entry state, not on the post-mutation author assignment. 3. Privileged sink: the author relationship is rewritten in persistent storage.

Preconditions derived from the source:

1. The attacker is authenticated and can edit entry 345. 2. The attacker is among the existing authors of entry 345, or otherwise satisfies canChangeAuthor() through the old author set. 3. The attacker has viewPeerEntries for the section. 4. User ID 1 exists and can be assigned as an author in that section.

Result:

1. enforceEditEntryPermissions() succeeds on the original entry state. 2. populateEntryModel() reads authors[]=1 from the request body. 3. setAttributesFromRequest() updates authorIds because canChangeAuthor() is evaluated against the old authorship state. 4. saveElement() persists the change and saveAuthors() rewrites the entry-author relation. 5. Entry 345 now appears authored by user 1.

Impact

This allows low-privileged users to falsify content ownership and alter the authorship of entries without having the dedicated author-management permission. The impact includes corrupted audit trails, misleading notifications, broken approval workflows, and unauthorized reassignment of content responsibility.