CVE-2026-53513: Better Auth: Server-side request forgery via unvalidated OIDC endpoints on @better-auth/sso provider registration

Published Jul 7, 2026
·
Updated

Am I affected?

Users are affected if all of the following are true:

- Their application uses @better-auth/sso at a version >= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11 on the stable line, or any 1.7.0-beta.x on the pre-release line. - The sso() plugin is added to their application's betterAuth({ plugins: [...] }) array. - Any user with a valid Better Auth session can reach POST /sso/register (the plugin's default gate accepts any session).

For the non-blind SSRF impact (full IAM credential or internal HTTP body exfiltration), no further configuration is required.

For the account takeover escalation, additionally:

- Developers set sso({ trustEmailVerified: true, ... }). - The developer's application deployment has accounts whose email overlaps with attacker-chosen domains.

If developers do not enable the SSO plugin, their application is not affected.

Fix:

1. Upgrade to @better-auth/sso@1.6.11 or later. 2. If developers cannot upgrade, see workarounds below.

Summary

The @better-auth/sso plugin's POST /sso/register endpoint accepts attacker-controlled oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint, tokenEndpoint, and jwksEndpoint URLs when skipDiscovery: true is set, persists them on the ssoProvider row without origin validation, then issues server-side fetches to those URLs during the OIDC callback. The fetched response body is reflected through the user profile, producing a non-blind SSRF reachable by any authenticated session. The same primitive exists on POST /sso/update-provider.

Details

The schema field types accept bare strings: no .url() validator, no origin gate. The discovery branch (skipDiscovery: false) routes URLs through validateDiscoveryUrl; the skip-discovery branch persists them as-is. At callback time three fetch sites read the stored URLs: validateAuthorizationCode for the token endpoint, betterFetch for the userInfo endpoint, and validateToken for the JWKS endpoint.

When trustEmailVerified: true is configured, the attacker can escalate to account linking. A malicious userInfo response with emailVerified: true and a chosen email triggers OAuth auto-link against any pre-existing user row with that email, compounding the SSRF into account takeover.

Patches

Fixed in @better-auth/sso@1.6.11. Provider registration (POST /sso/register with skipDiscovery: true) and every POST /sso/update-provider request now validate each supplied OIDC endpoint URL (authorizationEndpoint, tokenEndpoint, userInfoEndpoint, jwksEndpoint, discoveryEndpoint) at registration time. A URL is rejected unless it satisfies one of two conditions:

1. Its host is publicly routable on the internet, evaluated through the @better-auth/core/utils/host.isPublicRoutableHost gate. RFC 1918 private ranges, RFC 4193 unique-local addresses, link-local addresses (including the cloud-metadata IP 169.254.169.254), loopback, multicast, broadcast, and reserved ranges are rejected, along with cloud-metadata FQDNs. 2. Its origin is already listed in the application's trustedOrigins configuration. This preserves the documented escape hatch for customers running internal IdPs intentionally on private networks.

The schema also tightens from z.string() to z.url() on those fields, so malformed URLs fail at parse time rather than at fetch time. Deployments running internal IdPs that previously worked must add the IdP's origin to trustedOrigins to keep working after upgrade.

Workarounds

If developers cannot upgrade immediately:

- Disable provider self-registration: set sso({ providersLimit: 0 }). The limit is enforced before the schema branch, blocking every /sso/register regardless of skipDiscovery. - Reverse-proxy gate: block POST /sso/register and POST /sso/update-provider at the edge, or restrict to a denylist of source IPs and a small admin user list. - Network-level egress controls: block egress from the auth server to RFC 1918, RFC 4193, link-local ranges (169.254.0.0/16, fe80::/10), and the cloud-metadata FQDN list at the firewall or VPC level. AWS users should additionally enforce IMDSv2 (HttpTokens: required). - Set trustEmailVerified: false until upgrade. This caps the impact at non-blind SSRF and removes the account-takeover escalation, but does not stop the SSRF.

Impact

- Server-Side Request Forgery (non-blind): the attacker reads response bodies from any HTTP endpoint reachable from the auth server, including cloud metadata services (AWS IMDS, GCP metadata FQDN), internal-only APIs, and infrastructure services such as Redis or admin panels bound to localhost. - Account takeover (when trustEmailVerified: true): the attacker mints a malicious userInfo response asserting emailVerified: true for an arbitrary email, triggering OAuth auto-link against pre-existing user rows.

Credit

Reported by Vaadata.

Resources

- CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) - CWE-20: Improper Input Validation - CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary - CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Other sources

Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, the @better-auth/sso plugin's POST /sso/register and POST /sso/update-provider endpoints accept attacker-controlled oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint, tokenEndpoint, and jwksEndpoint URLs when skipDiscovery: true is set, store them on the ssoProvider row without origin validation, and fetch them during OIDC callback, allowing non-blind server-side request forgery and possible account linking when trustEmailVerified: true is configured. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.11.

MITRE

Affected Software

3 affected componentsFixes available
npm/@better-auth/sso>=0.1.0<1.6.11
1.6.11
better-auth Better-auth\/sso Node.js<1.6.11
better-auth Better Auth Node.js>=0.1.0<1.6.11

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/@better-auth/sso to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.6.11
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade @better-auth/sso to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.6.11
  3. Configuration

    Set sso({ trustEmailVerified: false }) until you upgrade to @better-auth/sso@1.6.11.

    @better-auth/sso plugin trustEmailVerified = false
  4. Configuration

    Disable provider self-registration by setting sso({ providersLimit: 0 }).

    @better-auth/sso plugin providersLimit = 0
  5. Compensating control

    Apply network egress controls from the auth server to block connections to RFC 1918, RFC 4193, link-local ranges (169.254.0.0/16, fe80::/10), and the cloud-metadata FQDN list at the firewall or VPC level.

  6. Compensating control

    At the reverse-proxy/edge, block POST /sso/register and POST /sso/update-provider, or restrict them to a denylist of source IPs and a small admin user list.

  7. Compensating control

    For AWS users, enforce IMDSv2 by setting HttpTokens: required.

  8. Compensating control

    Deployments running internal IdPs must add the IdP's origin to trustedOrigins to keep working after upgrade.

Event History

Jul 7, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·08:56 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·08:56 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Jul 15, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·05:15 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·05:15 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·06:16 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-53513?

CVE-2026-53513 has a critical severity score of 9.6.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-53513?

To fix CVE-2026-53513, upgrade the `@better-auth/sso` package to version 1.6.11 or later.

3

Am I affected by CVE-2026-53513?

You are affected by CVE-2026-53513 if your application uses `@better-auth/sso` version >= 0.1.0 and < 1.6.11, or any `1.7.0-beta.x`.

4

What type of vulnerabilities does CVE-2026-53513 include?

CVE-2026-53513 includes vulnerabilities categorized under Input Validation and SSRF.

5

What are the potential impacts of CVE-2026-53513?

The potential impacts of CVE-2026-53513 are critical as it can lead to high confidentiality and integrity risks.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203