CVE-2026-53924: Gardens v2: Permissionless syncOutflow bypasses streaming proposal disputes

Published Sep 3, 2026
·
Updated

Gardens v2 is a modular governance framework that enables communities to create and manage multiple governance pools with customizable parameters and voting mechanisms. Prior to 0xc9d4e0dacd937364793278180551e59d93cd43f9, StreamingEscrow.claim() correctly rejects withdrawals while an escrow is disputed, but the permissionless syncOutflow() path performs the same excess-balance transfer without checking disputed. After a streaming proposal is challenged, anyone can call syncOutflow() to transfer escrowed SuperTokens to the proposal beneficiary while the dispute is pending. If the proposal is later rejected, those tokens cannot be recovered by drainToStrategy(). This issue has been patched in 0xc9d4e0dacd937364793278180551e59d93cd43f9.

Affected Software

1 affected component
Gardens v2<0xc9d4e0dacd937364793278180551e59d93cd43f9

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade StreamingEscrow (syncOutflow permissionless path) to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0xc9d4e0dacd937364793278180551e59d93cd43f9

Event History

Sep 3, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·03:17 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·03:17 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·04:17 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are affected?

Gardens v2 deployments using code prior to commit 0xc9d4e0dacd937364793278180551e59d93cd43f9 are affected. The issue is in the StreamingEscrow syncOutflow() path.

2

What does an attacker need to do to exploit this?

A streaming proposal must first be challenged so that its escrow is disputed. Any party can then call the permissionless syncOutflow() function to send the escrow's SuperTokens to the proposal beneficiary while the dispute remains pending.

3

What is the consequence if the disputed proposal is ultimately rejected?

Tokens transferred through syncOutflow() cannot be recovered by drainToStrategy() after rejection. This can cause escrowed SuperTokens to remain with the proposal beneficiary despite the proposal being rejected.

4

What should operators do if they identify an affected deployment?

Update to the patch at commit 0xc9d4e0dacd937364793278180551e59d93cd43f9. Until patched, disputed streaming proposals are exposed to permissionless syncOutflow() calls.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203