CVE-2026-54234: vLLM: Remote DoS in vLLM via Invalid Recovered Token Reinjection
Summary
A frontend-legal multi-request speculative workload can make vLLM produce an out-of-vocabulary recovered token equal to vocabsize, convert that value to -1 when choosing the next live token for a request, and then feed that -1 back into the next drafter input ids. On Qwen3 GPTQ this reaches the worker-side drafting / attention path and crashes the engine with a GPU device-side assert.
The same issue is reachable through the public gRPC request surface by sending a specific overlapping Generate / Abort sequence.
Impact
- A remote client that can send public gRPC generation requests can crash the shared vLLM engine worker - The triggering request sequence aborts concurrent requests and prevents later requests from completing until the worker is restarted - In shared deployments, this is a service-wide denial of service for other clients, not just a failure isolated to the attacking requests - The failure is reproducible, so repeated request sequences can sustain the outage
Affected version
- Confirmed on vLLM 0.17.1 - Earlier and later versions have not been checked yet in this report
Repro model
- Official Hugging Face repo: - Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-GPTQ-Int8 - Anyone wants to reproduce the bug with my PoC scripts should download Qwen3-0.6B-GPTQ-Int8 first
Trigger chain
1. A legal multi-request speculative workload keeps structured-output state, speculative decoding, overlap, and request cancellation active in the same live engine. 2. During rejection sampling, vLLM produces a recovered token equal to the model vocabsize boundary value. 3. That recovered token appears in position 0 of the sampled speculative row for a live request. The same row also contains trailing padding entries equal to -1, but those padding entries are not the key fault by themselves. 4. The next-token preparation step treats the position-0 recovered token as the real next token for that request and converts that out-of-vocabulary value to -1. 5. The drafter writes that converted -1 back into the live next-step input-id row for the request. 6. The drafting / embedding / attention path later consumes that live invalid token and the worker crashes on GPU.
Details
Simple example
The important distinction is:
- trailing -1 values in a speculative row can be ordinary padding - the bug appears when the first live token for a request becomes 151936 == vocabsize, and that live token is then converted into -1
In simplified form, the bad transition looks like this:
text sampled speculative row: [151936, -1, -1, -1, ...]
At this point, the trailing -1 values are only padding. The critical problem is that the first position holds 151936, which is out of vocabulary and is being treated as the request's real next token.
Then vLLM prepares the next-token buffer:
text nexttokenids: [-1, ...]
Finally, that converted -1 is written back into the live model input ids:
text inputidsafter: [-1, 0, 0, 0, ...]
The crash happens because the live next token became -1 and was later consumed by the drafting / embedding / attention path, not merely because the speculative row contained padded -1 entries.
Trigger path in code
1. The workload is frontend-legal. The requests use normal SamplingParams features such as structured outputs, stop, badwords, mintokens, and streaming overlap. No malformed token-id list is required at the request boundary. 2. In speculative decoding, the rejection sampler can generate recovered tokens when drafted tokens are rejected. python # vllm/v1/sample/rejectionsampler.py def samplerecoveredtokens(...): recoveredtokenids = torch.emptylike(drafttokenids) samplerecoveredtokenskernel(batchsize, maxspeclen) return recoveredtokenids On the verified Qwen3 run, the recovered-token trace shows recoveredtokenids[0] = 151936, which is exactly vocabsize for this checkpoint. 3. The speculative proposer then prepares the next-token row from the sampled speculative row. python # vllm/v1/specdecode/eagle.py def preparenexttokenidspadded(...): ... eaglepreparenexttokenpaddedkernelgrid return nexttokenids, validsampledtokenscount In the verified trace, this step receives a sampled row beginning with 151936, followed by -1 padding. The important point is that 151936 occupies the first live token position for the request. This step then produces nexttokenids[0] = -1, meaning the live next token for the request has been converted to -1. 4. The drafter then rotates the draft input ids and inserts those nexttokenids back into the live input-id buffer. python # vllm/v1/specdecode/eagle.py def setinputsfirstpass(...): ... self.inputids[tokenindicestosample] = nexttokenids In the verified trace, this produces inputidsafter[0] = -1. 5. The model-side embed path later consumes those input ids. python # vllm/modelexecutor/models/qwen2.py def embedinputids(self, inputids: torch.Tensor) -> torch.Tensor: return self.embedtokens(inputids) In the verified trace, this is the first point where the converted -1 becomes visible as a real model input. The bug is not merely that the sampled speculative row contained padding -1; the bug is that the live next token for the request became -1 and was written back into input ids. 6. After that point, the visible sink depends on timing and backend state. On the attached Qwen3 reproducer, the engine commonly dies later in the drafting / attention path with CUDA error: device-side assert triggered, for example under flashattnvarlenfunc(...).
Local script breakdown
reprog4recoveredminus1local.py is a standalone local reproducer.
- It reads the Qwen3 checkpoint path from VLLMPOCG4MODEL or the built-in /path/to/qwen3 placeholder - It creates EngineCore directly without any external helper dependency - It submits one fixed multi-request workload that preserves the same overlap and speculative-decoding state needed for the bug - It writes: - requestpayloads.json - reproconfig.json - timeline.json - responses.json - error.txt - recoveredchaintrace.jsonl - recoveredchaintrace.jsonl is the key attribution artifact. It records the recovered-token chain directly from the standalone reproducer
gRPC script breakdown
reprog4recoveredminus1grpc.py is a standalone public gRPC reproducer.
- It reads the Qwen3 checkpoint path from VLLMPOCG4MODEL or the built-in /path/to/qwen3 placeholder - It starts a temporary vllm.entrypoints.grpcserver process - It sends only public Generate and Abort RPCs - It submits one fixed overlapping request sequence that preserves the same speculative-decoding state needed for the bug - After the crash window, it sends one more public Generate probe request to confirm that later gRPC requests also fail after the worker dies - It writes: - requestpayloads.json - timeline.json - servercommand.json - responses.json - postcrashprobe.json - server.stdout.log - server.stderr.log
Observed result
Local repro typically ends with:
- a recovered-token trace showing: - samplerecoveredtokensreturn -> recoveredtokenids[0] = 151936 - preparenexttokenidspadded -> nexttokenids[0] = -1 - setinputsfirstpass -> inputidsafter[0] = -1 - embedinputidsoutofrange -> inputids[0] = -1 - CUDA error: device-side assert triggered - a fatal engine-side failure
gRPC repro typically ends with:
- the triggering gRPC requests failing with INTERNAL: EngineCore encountered an issue. See stack trace (above) for the root cause. - server logs showing the worker dies with CUDA error: device-side assert triggered - a later public probe request also failing after the worker is dead
This demonstrates that the issue is reachable through the public gRPC request surface, not only through a local reproducer.
Log snippets
Local recovered-chain trace
text samplerecoveredtokensreturn: recoveredtokenids = [151936, ...] vocabsize = 151936
preparenexttokenidspadded: sampledtokenidshead = [[151936, -1, -1, ...], ...] nexttokenids = [-1, ...]
setinputsfirstpass: inputidsafter = [-1, 0, 0, 0, ...]
embedinputidsoutofrange: inputids = [-1, 0, 0, 0, ...]
gRPC server log
text torch.AcceleratorError: CUDA error: device-side assert triggered ... vllm.v1.engine.exceptions.EngineDeadError: EngineCore encountered an issue. See stack trace (above) for the root cause. ... Error in Generate for request postcrashprobe vllm.v1.engine.exceptions.EngineDeadError: EngineCore encountered an issue. See stack trace (above) for the root cause.
Root cause
This is a speculative-decoding state-handling bug, not an invalid frontend token-id input bug.
The root cause is that a recovered speculative token can become equal to vocabsize, then be selected as the live next token for a request, then be converted to -1, and that converted -1 is still written back into live drafter input ids and later consumed by the drafting / embedding / attention path.
For the Qwen3 checkpoint used here:
- 151936 == vocabsize
This value should be described as the model vocabsize boundary value, not as a legal token id.
Attachments
The attached bundle for this report should contain:
- reprog4recoveredminus1local.py - reprog4recoveredminus1grpc.py
These two standalone scripts are sufficient to reproduce the issue and its public gRPC reachability.
Fix
A fix for this vulnerability has been merged in: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/44744
Other sources
vLLM is a high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs. Prior to 0.24.0, a frontend-legal multi-request speculative decoding workload can cause the rejection sampler to produce a recovered token equal to the model vocabulary size boundary value, which is then converted to negative one when the engine selects the next live token for a request and is written back into the drafter's input ids; that out-of-vocabulary value is later consumed by the model's embedding and attention path and crashes the engine worker with a GPU device-side assertion. The same triggering request sequence is reachable through the public gRPC Generate and Abort endpoints, so a remote client that can send generation requests can crash the shared engine worker, aborting concurrent requests and causing a service-wide denial of service for other clients of the deployment until the worker is restarted. This issue is fixed in version 0.24.0.
— NVD
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/vllmto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.24.0 - Upgrade
Upgrade
vllmto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.24.0
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-54234?
CVE-2026-54234 has a severity rating of 7.5, categorized as high.
What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-54234?
CVE-2026-54234 is a remote denial of service (DoS) vulnerability in vLLM.
How can I mitigate CVE-2026-54234?
To mitigate CVE-2026-54234, update vLLM to version 0.24.0 or later.
What is affected by CVE-2026-54234?
CVE-2026-54234 affects vLLM versions prior to 0.24.0.
What causes the vulnerability CVE-2026-54234?
CVE-2026-54234 is caused by improper input validation leading to the production of an invalid recovered token during multi-request speculative decoding.