CVE-2026-54523: Kyverno: NamespacedGeneratingPolicy generator.apply() namespace argument unvalidated -- background controller creates RoleBindings in any namespace including kube-system
Summary
In Kyverno v1.18.1, a tenant who can create a NamespacedMutatingPolicy in their own namespace can instruct the admission controller to generate resources in any namespace by passing an arbitrary namespace string to the CEL generator.apply(namespace, resources) function.
Details
pkg/cel/libs/context.go:177 declares GenerateResources(namespace string, dataList []map[string]any). The namespace argument arrives unvalidated from the CEL expression generator.apply("<target-namespace>", [...]).
Version-Specific Impact
v1.18.0, v1.18.1 (affected via NamespacedMutatingPolicy only):
The nmpol CEL compiler unintentionally exposes the generator library to match condition expressions. A namespaced mutating policy can invoke generator.apply() in a boolean CEL expression such as matchConditions, triggering the admission controller to generate resources in any namespace at request time. This side effect executes with the admission controller's cluster-wide privileges.
NamespacedGeneratingPolicy is not a vector in v1.18.1 due to incomplete webhook and background processing wiring (not registered or functional).
Root Cause
The admission validator for NamespacedMutatingPolicy (pkg/cel/policies/mpol/validate.go) only checks that the policy compiles and does not enforce namespace scope on generator.apply() arguments.
Compare correctly-guarded equivalents: pkg/engine/context/loaders/configmap.go:102 rejects cross-namespace ConfigMap references for namespaced policies, and pkg/engine/apicall/apicall.go:73-82 enforces namespace segment matching. GenerateResources has neither guard.
Proof of Concept
Prerequisites: namespace tenant-ns exists; attacker has create on namespacedmutatingpolicies.policies.kyverno.io in tenant-ns.
yaml apiVersion: policies.kyverno.io/v1beta1 kind: NamespacedMutatingPolicy metadata: name: cross-ns-escalate namespace: tenant-ns spec: matchConstraints: resourceRules: - apiGroups: [""] apiVersions: ["v1"] resources: ["configmaps"] operations: ["CREATE"] mutations: - patchType: applyConfiguration applyConfiguration: expression: object matchConditions: - name: trigger-escalation expression: | generator.apply("kube-system", [ { "apiVersion": dyn("v1"), "kind": dyn("ConfigMap"), "metadata": dyn({ "name": "kube-system-config", "namespace": "kube-system" }), "data": dyn({ "injected-by": "tenant-policy", "impact": "unauthorized access to kube-system namespace" }) } ])
Apply the policy, then create any ConfigMap in tenant-ns to trigger the admission webhook. The admission controller creates configmap/kube-system-config in kube-system. By default, the admission controller has create on ConfigMaps in all namespaces.
Impact
A namespace-scoped user with create on NamespacedMutatingPolicy in >=v1.18.1 can create ConfigMaps, NetworkPolicies, Secrets, and other resources in any namespace using the admission controller's cluster-wide RBAC. This allows:
Injecting sensitive configuration into protected namespaces (e.g., kube-system, default) Disrupting cluster networking via NetworkPolicies Privilege escalation via RoleBinding creation (for roles the admission controller holds or lesser-privileged roles) Privilege escalation via RoleBinding creation in other namespaces Any installation that grants non-admin users access to NamespacedMutatingPolicy creation is affected.
Timeline
2026-05-20: Vulnerability reproduced on main 2026-07-13: CVE-2026-54523 / GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9 published 2026-07-22: Advisory clarified to document actual v1.18.1 attack vector (NamespacedMutatingPolicy in matchConditions, not NamespacedGeneratingPolicy)
Advisory Update
This advisory was updated to clarify the v1.18.1 attack surface. The nmpol vector in matchConditions was the reachable attack path in v1.18.1, while ngpol lacked end-to-end plumbing. The CVE, patched version, and CVSS score remain unchanged. Original report by @0xVijay.
Other sources
Kyverno is a policy engine designed for cloud native platform engineering teams. From 1.18.0 until 1.18.2, the NamespacedMutatingPolicy CEL compiler exposes the generator library to matchConditions, allowing a namespace-scoped policy to invoke generator.apply(namespace, resources) with an arbitrary target namespace. The validation in pkg/cel/policies/mpol/validate.go checks that the policy compiles but does not enforce namespace scope, and GenerateResources in pkg/cel/libs/context.go does not reject the cross-namespace target. A user who can create NamespacedMutatingPolicy objects in one namespace can cause the admission controller, operating with cluster-wide privileges, to create ConfigMaps, NetworkPolicies, Secrets, RoleBindings, and other resources in another namespace, enabling unauthorized modification and potential privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 1.18.2.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
go/github.com/kyverno/kyvernoto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.18.2 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Kyvernoto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.18.2 - Configuration
Remove/modify any NamespacedMutatingPolicy that uses generator.apply("<target-namespace>", ...) from matchConditions (v1.18.0/v1.18.1 affected via NamespacedMutatingPolicy only) to prevent cross-namespace resource generation with the admission controller's cluster-wide privileges.
Kyverno (policy using NamespacedMutatingPolicy) generator.apply(<target-namespace>, ...) usage in matchConditions = Do not pass an arbitrary target namespace string to generator.apply in NamespacedMutatingPolicy matchConditions; ensure namespace scope is enforced.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Kyverno versions and policy types are affected?
Kyverno v1.18.0 and v1.18.1 are affected through NamespacedMutatingPolicy. In v1.18.1, NamespacedGeneratingPolicy is not an exploitable vector because its webhook and background processing wiring is incomplete and nonfunctional.
What access does an attacker need?
An attacker needs permission to create a NamespacedMutatingPolicy in their own namespace. They can invoke generator.apply() from a boolean CEL expression such as matchConditions, causing generation to run with the admission controller's cluster-wide privileges.
What is the practical impact of successful exploitation?
The attacker can supply an arbitrary target namespace to generator.apply() and cause resources to be generated outside their own namespace, including kube-system. The described impact includes creating RoleBindings in other namespaces.
What can be restricted while a fix is being deployed?
Restrict who can create NamespacedMutatingPolicy resources, particularly untrusted tenants with namespace-scoped policy authoring permissions. The described exploit depends on that creation permission and on use of generator.apply() in CEL match conditions.