CVE-2026-54873: QUIC STREAM Fragment Metadata DoS

Published Sep 29, 2026
·
Updated

Issue summary: QUIC process may keep memory for QUIC packet buffer for much longer period than necessary.

Impact summary: Remote peer can exploit this vulnerability by sending maliciously crafted packets, making the local QUIC stack to keep the memory for packet buffers allocated. The time for which the memory remains allocated is entirely under the control of the potentially malicious remote peer.

CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Description: To save copy operation from the packet buffer to the stream reassemble buffer the QUIC stack leaves the stream data on the packet buffer waiting to be copied to a buffer provided by the local receiving application. The QUIC stack releases a reference to the packet buffer only after the data are copied to the application buffer. This design is more efficient for legitimate data transfers but enables an attacker to allocate a lot more memory than actually required by the data kept in the receiving stream buffer.

To mitigate the vulnerability, the QUIC stack now calculates and monitors memory overhead for every stream. The memory overhead for a single stream frame is calculated as a difference between the size of the whole packet that carries the stream frame and the size of the stream frame itself. The memory overhead for a single stream frame is added to the total (cumulative) memory overhead QUIC stack keeps for each stream. Once the cumulative memory overhead exceeds 64kB, the QUIC stack moves the stream frame data from the packet buffer to the stream buffer, starting with the next packet received.

FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

Affected Software

1 affected component
OpenSSL OpenSSL

Event History

Sep 29, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·03:32 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·03:32 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·04:17 PM
DescriptionWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What does an attacker need in order to trigger the memory retention?

The attacker must act as a remote QUIC peer and send maliciously crafted packets. The issue occurs when stream data remains in packet buffers while the stack waits for the local receiving application to provide a buffer for copying that data.

2

Can the attacker influence how long memory remains allocated?

Yes. The period for which packet-buffer memory remains allocated is entirely under the control of the potentially malicious remote peer, allowing retained memory to accumulate.

3

What changes in the mitigation?

The mitigated QUIC stack calculates and monitors memory overhead for every stream. This addresses the excess memory retained when packet buffers are kept referenced for stream data awaiting delivery to the local application.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203