CVE-2026-54917: SeaweedFS: Path traversal in the S3 and Iceberg REST gateways allows cross-bucket access
Summary
The S3 API gateway and the Iceberg REST catalog gateway construct their routers with mux.NewRouter().SkipClean(true). With path cleaning disabled, a .. segment inside the URL survives routing, so a request such as:
GET /bucket-A/../evil-bucket/key
is matched as bucket=bucket-A, object=../evil-bucket/key. The captured object key is then joined into a filer path with util.JoinPath (S3) / path.Join (Iceberg), which collapse the .. server-side, so the actual read or write lands in evil-bucket.
The captured path variables were never validated for traversal segments before reaching the handlers, so bucket isolation depended on downstream checks rather than on the path itself.
Impact
- With authentication disabled (enableAuth=false): direct cross-bucket read and write. An object key containing .. resolves to and operates on a different bucket than the one named in the request path. - With authentication enabled (enableAuth=true): an authorization confused-deputy. IAM evaluates the policy against the mux {bucket} variable (bucket-A) in iam.authRequestWithAuthType, while the I/O is performed against the traversed target (evil-bucket). A principal authorized for one bucket can therefore reach objects in another bucket it has no grant for. This breaks tenant isolation.
The same class of traversal applies to the Iceberg REST catalog's {prefix}, {namespace}, and {table} path variables.
%2e%2e-encoded and ..\ (backslash) variants are equivalent, because gorilla/mux URL-decodes captured variables and NormalizeObjectKey folds \ to / before the path is used.
Affected components
- S3 API gateway (weed s3, and the S3 endpoint embedded in weed server) - Iceberg REST catalog gateway
Affected versions
All releases prior to 4.30.
Patched version
4.30 and later.
Proof of concept
With a bucket evil-bucket containing secret.txt, and a caller that only has (or needs no) access to bucket-A:
GET /bucket-A/../evil-bucket/secret.txt HTTP/1.1 Host: <gateway>
The response returns the contents of evil-bucket/secret.txt. The encoded form GET /bucket-A/%2e%2e/evil-bucket/secret.txt behaves identically.
Remediation
Upgrade to SeaweedFS 4.30 or later. The fix adds a validation middleware to both gateway routers that rejects any captured path variable containing a . or .. segment, a NUL byte, an embedded slash/backslash in single-segment slots, or an empty captured value, before any handler runs.
Workarounds
For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, place a reverse proxy in front of the gateway that normalizes the request path and rejects requests whose path contains .., %2e%2e, or backslash sequences. Note that disabling auth removes the only remaining barrier, so do not rely on enableAuth=false deployments being protected by anything.
Resources
- Fix: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/pull/9687 (commit dd1b428)
Credits
Reported responsibly by Denis Abashkin (@dadbravo).
Other sources
SeaweedFS is a distributed storage system for object storage (S3), file systems, and Iceberg tables. Prior to 4.30, the S3 API gateway and the Iceberg REST catalog gateway construct their routers with mux.NewRouter().SkipClean(true). With path cleaning disabled, a .. segment inside the URL survives routing, so a request such as GET /bucket-A/../evil-bucket/key, is matched as bucket=bucket-A, object=../evil-bucket/key. The captured object key is then joined into a filer path with util.JoinPath (S3) / path.Join (Iceberg), which collapse the .. server-side, so the actual read or write lands in evil-bucket. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.30.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
go/github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.0.0-20260526080459-dd1b4287899e - Upgrade
Upgrade
seaweedfs/seaweedfsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.30 - Configuration
For deployments affected by the path-cleaning bypass behavior (prior to 4.30), do not rely on mux.NewRouter().SkipClean(true); upgrade to 4.30+ instead, where a validation middleware rejects captured traversal segments before handlers run.
SeaweedFS gateway (S3 API gateway and Iceberg REST catalog gateway) SkipClean = true (current/affected behavior) - Compensating control
For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, place a reverse proxy in front of the gateway that normalizes the request path and rejects requests whose path contains `..`, `%2e%2e`, or backslash sequences.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-54917?
CVE-2026-54917 has a risk rating of 71, indicating a significant vulnerability that could lead to security issues.
How do I fix CVE-2026-54917?
To fix CVE-2026-54917, upgrade your SeaweedFS to version 4.30 or later, where the vulnerability has been addressed.
What impact does CVE-2026-54917 have on SeaweedFS users?
CVE-2026-54917 allows for path traversal attacks that can result in unauthorized cross-bucket access in SeaweedFS.
Is CVE-2026-54917 a remote code execution vulnerability?
CVE-2026-54917 is not a remote code execution vulnerability; it specifically pertains to path traversal and unauthorized data access.
What components of SeaweedFS are affected by CVE-2026-54917?
The S3 API gateway and the Iceberg REST catalog gateway of SeaweedFS are affected by CVE-2026-54917.