CVE-2026-66788: Lighthouse: lighthouse: arbitrary namespace injection via attacker-controlled broker label

Published Jul 27, 2026
·
Updated

A flaw was found in Lighthouse. A remote attacker, by compromising a spoke cluster, can exploit a vulnerability where the destination namespace for resource injection is derived from an attacker-controlled label or annotation on the broker object. This allows the attacker to inject unauthorized EndpointSlices and ServiceImports into any namespace on peer clusters, including critical system namespaces like kube-system and openshift-. This could lead to privilege escalation or other forms of system compromise within the cluster.

Other sources

The destination namespace in the local cluster is taken directly from a label/annotation on the broker object — fully attacker-controlled. The lighthouse-agent SA (which holds cluster-wide create/update on endpointslices and serviceimports per operator RBAC) then writes the object into that namespace on behalf of the remote cluster. There is no allowlist, no check that the namespace exists locally with matching ownership, and no check that the source cluster was authorized to export that {namespace, name}. A compromised spoke can inject EndpointSlices and ServiceImports into any namespace on peer clusters, including kube-system and openshift- namespaces.

Source: Project Glasswing AI-SAST audit of submariner-io/lighthouse. Finding ID: FIND-002 Assurance: executionproven

— Red Hat

Affected Software

1 affected component
Submariner Lighthouse

Event History

Jul 27, 2026
Data Sourced
via Red Hat·03:44 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Aug 20, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·06:15 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·06:15 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·07:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Who is exposed to this issue?

Deployments using Lighthouse with spoke clusters are exposed if a spoke cluster can be compromised. The compromised spoke can target peer clusters by influencing labels or annotations on the broker object.

2

What access does an attacker need to exploit it?

The attacker needs to compromise a spoke cluster and be able to control the relevant label or annotation that determines the broker object's destination namespace. No user interaction is required.

3

What can an attacker do after successful exploitation?

An attacker can inject unauthorized EndpointSlices and ServiceImports into arbitrary namespaces on peer clusters, including kube-system and openshift-* namespaces. This may enable privilege escalation or broader cluster compromise.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203