CVE-2026-67442: FUXA Business Logic Flaw: Role Deletion Without User Assignment Cleanup

Published Aug 18, 2026
·
Updated

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Prior to 1.3.3, DELETE /api/roles removes role definitions through server/runtime/users/usrstorage.js but does not remove the deleted role identifier from each user's info.roles array or the runtime usersMap cache. If a permission configuration still references that identifier, an affected user can retain authorization rights that an administrator intended to revoke, causing residual privilege, inconsistent access-control state, and misleading audit results. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.3.

Affected Software

1 affected component
FUXA<1.3.3

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade FUXA to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.3.3

Event History

Aug 18, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·08:08 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·08:08 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments and configurations are exposed?

FUXA deployments prior to version 1.3.3 are affected. Exposure requires use of role-based permissions where a deleted role identifier remains referenced by a permission configuration and assigned to a user's stored or cached role list.

2

What conditions are needed for residual privileges to persist?

An administrator must delete a role, and the affected user must still have that role identifier in their info.roles array or the runtime usersMap cache. Residual access occurs only if a permission configuration continues to reference that identifier.

3

What should administrators do to remediate or mitigate the issue?

Upgrade FUXA to version 1.3.3, which fixes the issue. If upgrading cannot occur immediately, review deleted roles, user role assignments, runtime user cache state, and permission configurations for stale references to deleted role identifiers.

4

How can an administrator identify an affected access-control state?

Check whether roles have been deleted while affected users still retain the deleted role identifier in their stored info.roles arrays or runtime usersMap cache, and whether permissions still reference that identifier. Such stale references can produce authorization that no longer matches the intended role configuration.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203