CVE-2026-68558: Wekan: SSRF filter bypass via DNS-resolving hostname in outgoing webhooks (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-53446)

Published Aug 19, 2026
·
Updated

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. From 8.36 until 9.74, the outgoing webhook Integration URL validator in models/integrations.js checked only the literal URL.hostname against regular expressions, so DNS names such as 169-254-169-254.nip.io passed that first-line check. The delivery path's fetchSafe guard already blocked the reported IPv4 destination, but its separate IPv4-only resolver and duplicated blocklist created inconsistent all-address-family enforcement and drift risk between input-time and connection-time validation. Version 9.74 makes server/lib/ssrfGuard.js resolve all addresses with dns.lookup({ all: true }), validate every result through the shared isIpBlocked logic, pin the connection, and block redirects. This issue is fixed in version 9.74.

Affected Software

2 affected components
Wekan Wekan>=8.36<=9.74
Wekan Wekan=9.74

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade Wekan to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.74
  2. Compensating control

    If you cannot upgrade to Wekan 9.74 immediately, review and align SSRF protection so input-time validation (models/integrations.js URL.hostname regex checks) and connection-time enforcement (server/lib/ssrfGuard.js IPv4/IPv6 resolution and isIpBlocked logic) use the same blocking behavior across all address families, and ensure redirects are blocked

Event History

Aug 19, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·07:22 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·07:22 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed?

Wekan versions from 8.36 through 9.74 are affected. Exposure applies where a user with the necessary privileges can configure an outgoing webhook Integration URL.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit this issue?

An attacker needs low-privilege access and the ability to set an outgoing webhook URL. They can use a DNS-resolving hostname that passes the literal hostname validator while resolving to a blocked address.

3

Is the issue mitigated by the existing webhook delivery guard?

Not reliably. The existing fetchSafe guard blocked the reported IPv4 destination, but used a separate IPv4-only resolver and duplicated blocklist, leaving inconsistent enforcement between URL validation and connection-time checks.

4

What changes in the fixed release?

Version 9.74 resolves all hostname addresses, validates every resolved address using shared blocking logic, pins the connection, and blocks redirects.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203