CVE-2026-69247: cryptography: PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption exposes a Bleichenbacher oracle through distinguishable errors and timing
Summary
pkcs7decryptder, pkcs7decryptpem, and pkcs7decryptsmime reported the outcome of decrypting a RecipientInfo's encryptedKey in several distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An application that decrypts attacker-supplied EnvelopedData and reflects the outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the content-encryption key.
Introduced in 44.0.0. Fixed in 50.0.0.
Details
Decryption ran as: RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of encryptedKey → build an AES cipher from the result → AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Each stage failed differently, with no RFC 3218 mitigation:
1. invalid RSA padding → Decryption failed 2. valid padding, bad key length → Invalid key size (N) for AES., disclosing N 3. correct length, wrong key → Invalid padding bytes. 4. the real key → plaintext
Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection: OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. On OpenSSL 3.2+, used in our wheels, invalid padding instead returns a synthetic plaintext of pseudorandom length, so the error channel does not distinguish conforming ciphertexts.
Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted EnvelopedData matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as an S/MIME gateway or mail filter.
Fix
Per RFC 3218, the content-encryption algorithm is now resolved before the private key is used, so the expected key length is known in advance. If the RSA decryption fails or recovers a key of the wrong length, a random key of the expected length is substituted and decryption continues down an identical path. All failures now report identically and perform the same work.
Not addressed by this fix
EnvelopedData does not authenticate its content. Tampering with encryptedContent alone yields a CBC padding oracle that recovers plaintext at roughly 256 queries per byte, without recovering any key, on every backend. This is a property of PKCS#7 rather than of this implementation, cannot be fixed in the library, and is now documented.
Credit
Reported by @X1AOxiang.
Other sources
cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. From 44.0.0 until 50.0.0, pkcs7decryptder, pkcs7decryptpem, and pkcs7decryptsmime reported the outcome of decrypting a RecipientInfo's encryptedKey in several distinguishable ways, one of which disclosed the exact length recovered from the RSA operation. The same distinction was also observable by timing. An application that decrypts attacker-supplied EnvelopedData and reflects the outcome gives the attacker a Bleichenbacher oracle against the content-encryption key. Decryption ran as RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 decrypt of encryptedKey, build an AES cipher from the result, then AES-CBC decrypt and PKCS#7 unpad. Invalid RSA padding, a valid padding with a bad key length, a correct length with a wrong key, and the real key each failed or succeeded differently. Case 1 is reachable only where the linked library lacks implicit rejection: OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1, LibreSSL, and BoringSSL. Exploitation requires a service that auto-decrypts untrusted EnvelopedData matching the victim certificate and answers adaptively at high volume, such as an S/MIME gateway or mail filter. This issue is fixed in 50.0.0.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/cryptographyto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 50.0.0 - Upgrade
Upgrade
cryptographyto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 50.0.0 - Configuration
Upgrade to cryptography 50.0.0, which applies the RFC 3218 mitigation so failures/time no longer distinguish RSA padding/key length vs correct key length during EnvelopedData decryption at pkcs7_decrypt_der, pkcs7_decrypt_pem, and pkcs7_decrypt_smime.
cryptography (PKCS#7 EnvelopedData decryption) RFC 3218 mitigation (resolve content-encryption algorithm before RSA operation) = enabled
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-69247?
CVE-2026-69247 has a risk score of 55, indicating a moderate to high vulnerability.
How do I fix CVE-2026-69247?
To resolve CVE-2026-69247, update the pip/cryptography library to the latest version that addresses this vulnerability.
What impacts does CVE-2026-69247 have on system security?
CVE-2026-69247 could potentially allow attackers to exploit a timing oracle to gain information about encrypted data.
Which cryptographic functions are affected by CVE-2026-69247?
The PKCS#7 functions, specifically pkcs7_decrypt_der, pkcs7_decrypt_pem, and pkcs7_decrypt_smime, are affected by CVE-2026-69247.
Who is vulnerable to CVE-2026-69247?
Any application or system using an affected version of the pip/cryptography library is vulnerable to CVE-2026-69247.