CVE-2026-72793: SiYuan before v3.7.4 Information Disclosure via /api/system/getConf
CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72793.
Summary
/api/system/getConf is registered with CheckAuth only and is reachable by the publish RoleReader token, and anonymously when Publish.Auth.Enable is false. Its non-administrator masking chain is a blocklist that enumerates fields individually. Three fields that the configuration-export endpoint in the same file deliberately clears are absent from that blocklist and are returned to readers:
| Field | JSON | What it is | Cleared by exportConf at | |---|---|---|---| | Conf.CookieKey | cookieKey | The session-cookie signing key | kernel/api/system.go:360 | | Conf.Export.PandocBin | export.pandocBin | Absolute path embedding the OS username | kernel/api/system.go:338 | | Conf.NotebookCrypto | notebookCrypto | Encrypted-notebook key material | kernel/api/system.go:360 |
The project has already classified all three as values that must not leave the server. The reader-facing path returns them.
Details
Route. kernel/api/router.go:70 : POST /api/system/getConf → model.CheckAuth → getConf. No CheckReadonly, no CheckAdminRole.
The masking chain, and what each stage covers. getConf masks through GetMaskedConf() → HideConfSecret() (non-administrators) → FilterConfByPublishIgnore() (readers) → a browser-request path strip.
- GetMaskedConf: UserData, MCPOAuth, AccessAuthCode. - HideConfSecret: AI, Api, Flashcard, ServerAddrs, Publish, Repo, Sync, Secrets, Variables, and the System paths. No reference to CookieKey or Export.PandocBin. - FilterConfByPublishIgnore: UILayout only. - Browser strip (kernel/api/system.go:630-631): System paths only.
Each stage names fields explicitly, so any field nobody thought to add is returned by default.
---
1. CookieKey: the live session-signing key.
The value is passed straight into the session store at startup:
cli/cmd/serve.go:67 go server.Serve(false, model.Conf.CookieKey) kernel/server/serve.go:152 sessionStore = cookie.NewStore([]byte(cookieKey)) kernel/server/serve.go:159 ginServer.Use(sessions.Sessions("siyuan", sessionStore))
gin-contrib/sessions/cookie.NewStore constructed with a single key uses that key as the gorilla/securecookie HMAC key. The siyuan session cookie is signed with the value this endpoint hands out, so an attacker holding it can mint and modify session cookies the server accepts as authentic.
Escalating a forged session to administrator additionally requires the forged SessionData to carry the matching AccessAuthCode which is masked or the instance to have no access-auth code configured, which is a common deployment. The unconditional impact, present on every instance, is disclosure of a persistent cryptographic secret to an unauthenticated party. Rotating it invalidates every active session, so it cannot be quietly refreshed.
---
2. Export.PandocBin: bypasses a shipped privacy control.
The field is an absolute path that embeds the OS username by construction:
conf/export.go:35 PandocBin string json:"pandocBin" model/conf.go:430-431 if "" == Conf.Export.PandocBin { Conf.Export.PandocBin = util.PandocBinPath } util/pandoc.go:154 PandocBinPath = filepath.Join(tempPandocDir, "bin", "pandoc.exe") util/pandoc.go:134 tempPandocDir = filepath.Join(TempDir, "pandoc") util/working.go:359 TempDir = filepath.Join(WorkspaceDir, "temp") util/working.go:312 defaultWorkspaceDir = filepath.Join(userProfile, "SiYuan")
→ C:\Users\<username>\SiYuan\temp\pandoc\bin\pandoc.exe
This one is notable beyond the disclosure itself, because a control was shipped specifically to prevent it. kernel/api/system.go:630 adds, for browser requests:
go if util.IsBrowserRequest(c) { maskedConf.System.WorkspaceDir = "" maskedConf.System.AppDir = "" maskedConf.System.ConfDir = "" maskedConf.System.DataDir = "" maskedConf.System.HomeDir = "" } // 避免泄露用户名等敏感信息
The comment states the goal plainly: avoid leaking the username and other sensitive information. The block enumerates only System. and misses Export.PandocBin, which carries the same username through the same response. A publish reader is a browser request, so the System paths are blanked while export.pandocBin passes through intact. Where an administrator has configured a custom pandoc location, that path is disclosed instead still a filesystem-layout disclosure.
---
3. NotebookCrypto. Encrypted-notebook key material is likewise absent from HideConfSecret while exportConf sets it to nil. Reported previously and included here only because it is the third instance of the same root cause; the fix below closes all three together.
---
The root cause is the blocklist itself. exportConf (kernel/api/system.go:299) clones the configuration and clears each secret before returning it CookieKey, NotebookCrypto, Export.PandocBin, Account, Stat, System.ID, the AI keys. That cloner is the project's own working inventory of what must not leave the server. getConf's non-administrator path maintains a separate, shorter list that has now diverged from it in three places. Any future secret added to the config will default to exposed on the reader path unless someone remembers to extend the blocklist.
Proof of Concept
Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account.
POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/getConf {}
→ 200. The conf object contains: cookieKey — the session-signing key, cleartext export.pandocBin — absolute path containing the OS username notebookCrypto — encrypted-notebook key material
Differential check against the endpoint that strips them, same instance:
POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/exportConf
→ cookieKey is empty, export.pandocBin is empty, notebookCrypto is null
The same three values are withheld by one endpoint and returned by the other.
Impact
An anonymous reader in publish mode or any publish RoleReader obtains the server's session-cookie signing key, permitting forgery and tampering of session cookies the server validates as authentic, with administrator authentication reachable on instances that have no access-auth code configured. The same response discloses the operating-system username and workspace layout, defeating a control added specifically to prevent that disclosure, and encrypted-notebook key material.
Suggested fix
Route non-administrator getConf responses through the exportConf cloner rather than extending HideConfSecret field by field. The cloner already handles every field named here and is the list the project actually maintains; keeping two divergent inventories of the same secrets is what produced all three gaps. If a targeted patch is preferred in the interim, clear CookieKey and NotebookCrypto in HideConfSecret and add Export.PandocBin to the IsBrowserRequest block, then audit the config struct for any remaining absolute-path or secret-bearing field.
Other sources
SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 fail to mask sensitive configuration fields in the /api/system/getConf endpoint, allowing anonymous or publish-reader users to obtain the session-cookie signing key, OS username via pandoc path, and encrypted-notebook key material. Attackers can forge and tamper with session cookies to impersonate users, and on instances without access-auth codes configured, escalate to administrator privileges.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
go/github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernelto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.0.0-20260725132049-2d8b98395a91 - Upgrade
Upgrade
SiYuanto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in v3.7.4 - Configuration
As an interim targeted patch: in `HideConfSecret`, clear `CookieKey` and `NotebookCrypto`; then update the `IsBrowserRequest` masking logic to include `Export.PandocBin` in the same browser-path blocklist, and audit the config struct for any remaining absolute-path or secret-bearing field so it is explicitly withheld.
SiYuan kernel/api/system.go HideConfSecret and browser-request masking CookieKey, NotebookCrypto, Export.PandocBin masking/list = Clear CookieKey and NotebookCrypto in HideConfSecret and add Export.PandocBin to the IsBrowserRequest block; also audit the config struct for any remaining absolute-path or secret-bearing field - Configuration
Change authorization/masking flow: for non-administrator access to `/api/system/getConf`, route the response through the `exportConf` cloner (the project's maintained inventory of sensitive fields) so the short divergent blocklists cannot reintroduce gaps.
SiYuan kernel/api/system.go getConf response path Routing of non-administrator getConf responses = Route non-administrator `getConf` responses through the `exportConf` cloner rather than extending `HideConfSecret` field-by-field - Operational
Rotate/reissue sessions after applying the fix, since the masking fix invalidates/changes the exposure of the session-cookie signing key (the `CookieKey`), and rotating it invalidates every active session.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-72793?
CVE-2026-72793 is classified as high severity with a score of 8.6.
How do I fix CVE-2026-72793?
To fix CVE-2026-72793, upgrade SiYuan to version 3.7.4 or later.
What vulnerabilities does CVE-2026-72793 present?
CVE-2026-72793 allows information disclosure of sensitive configuration fields, including session-cookie signing keys.
Who is affected by CVE-2026-72793?
Users of SiYuan versions prior to 3.7.4 are affected by CVE-2026-72793.
What type of attack can be executed using CVE-2026-72793?
CVE-2026-72793 enables attackers to forge and tamper with sensitive information by accessing the /api/system/getConf endpoint.