CVE-2026-75029: Message parser retains every identical singleton RDATA, enabling wire-to-work amplification

Published Sep 16, 2026
·
Updated

In a query response, an attacker may send named multiple copies of a record that should only exist once (such as an SOA record). If the RDATA is the same on all the copies, the record is appended to the in-memory RDATA set, which can cause increased memory usage of the negative cache and possibly lead to other memory attack vectors. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.

Affected Software

1 affected component
ISC BIND 9>=9.11.0<=9.18.50, >=9.20.0<=9.20.27, >=9.21.0<=9.21.25, >=9.11.3-S1<=9.18.50-S1, >=9.20.9-S1<=9.20.27-S1

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.20.29
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.21.26
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.20.29-S1

Event History

Sep 16, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·02:15 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·02:15 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed to this issue?

Deployments running affected ISC BIND 9 versions are exposed when their named process handles query responses containing repeated identical singleton RDATA records. The affected ranges include 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.

2

What must an attacker provide to trigger the memory growth?

An attacker must cause named to process a query response containing multiple copies of a record that should occur only once, such as an SOA record, with identical RDATA on every copy. The repeated records are appended to the in-memory RDATA set.

3

What is the practical impact?

Processing these responses can increase negative-cache memory usage and may lead to other memory attack vectors. The stated availability impact is low.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203