CVE-2026-76187: Apache Airflow Keycloak provider: Any realm client's credentials mint an Airflow session JWT

Published Sep 15, 2026
·
Updated

Apache Airflow Keycloak provider: the unauthenticated token endpoint accepts a client-credentials grant for any confidential client registered in the Keycloak realm, not only the client configured for Airflow. No allowlist restricts which client ids may authenticate, so the credentials of an unrelated application that happens to share the realm are valid Airflow login credentials, and Airflow mints a signed session token for that application's service account. The endpoint also answers unauthenticated credential guesses against Keycloak under Airflow's identity.

Affects deployments using the Keycloak auth manager whose realm is shared with other confidential clients. The attacker needs valid credentials for any one of those clients, not for Airflow. Resource authorization is still evaluated per subject, so the access gained is whatever that service account holds, plus any endpoint gated only on being authenticated.

Users of apache-airflow-providers-keycloak are recommended to upgrade to version 0.10.0 or later, which accepts only the configured client on that grant.

Affected Software

1 affected component
apache-airflow-providers-keycloak<0.10.0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade apache-airflow-providers-keycloak to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.10.0

Event History

Sep 16, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·09:10 AM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·09:10 AM
DescriptionWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed?

Deployments using the Keycloak auth manager are affected when their Keycloak realm is shared with other confidential clients. A realm containing only the client configured for Airflow does not present the unrelated-client condition described here.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit this?

The attacker needs valid client-credentials for any confidential client in the shared Keycloak realm; they do not need the Airflow client's credentials. Airflow then issues a signed session token for that unrelated client's service account.

3

What level of access does exploitation provide?

Access is evaluated as the unrelated client's service account, so the attacker receives whatever permissions that account has. They may also reach endpoints that require only an authenticated session.

4

What should be done if an immediate upgrade is not possible?

The provided remediation is to upgrade apache-airflow-providers-keycloak to version 0.10.0 or later. Until then, deployments should treat credentials for every confidential client sharing the realm as potential Airflow login credentials.

5

How can we determine whether we are affected?

Review whether Airflow uses the Keycloak auth manager and whether its configured Keycloak realm contains confidential clients other than the one configured for Airflow. If so, valid credentials for those other clients can be accepted by the affected token endpoint.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203