CVE-2026-77633: Cloudreve: Storage-quota TOCTOU race allows quota bypass and storage-based denial of service
Summary
Cloudreve v4 splits the storage-quota check (reading the user's used bytes and comparing them to MaxStorage) and the charge (incrementing users.storage) into two non-atomic steps in the PrepareUpload code path. This creates a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition. Any authenticated user — including an unprivileged account in the default User group — can concurrently issue several upload-session requests that all read the same stale used snapshot, each pass the check, and then each contribute their declared size to users.storage. The end result is that the total approved capacity exceeds the group's MaxStorage many times over.
The same primitive is trivially amplifiable into a storage-based denial of service. During PrepareUpload, Cloudreve reserves the declared size against users.storage before any bytes are written, so an attacker can push the reserved amount far beyond the host's physical disk (tested: a 1 GiB-quota account reserved 17 GiB in a single 20-way burst), and can then materialise the reservation by completing chunked uploads to actually write the excess bytes to disk. Amplification to the host's free space fills the disk and denies uploads for every user of the instance.
Exploitation requires only a valid session with Files.Write permission. No administrator configuration, no non-default storage policy, and no elevated privileges are needed. The default deployment (local storage policy, default User group) is affected.
Technical details
PrepareUpload in pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/upload.go splits quota enforcement across two stages:
Stage A — the check (snapshot compare, no lock) — pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/validator.go:
go func (f DBFS) validateUserCapacity(ctx context.Context, size int64, u ent.User) error { capacity, err := f.Capacity(ctx, u) // reads "used" if err != nil { return ... } return f.validateUserCapacityRaw(ctx, size, capacity) }
func (f DBFS) validateUserCapacityRaw(ctx context.Context, size int64, capacity fs.Capacity) error { if capacity.Used + size > capacity.Total { // snapshot compare only; no lock, no reservation return fs.ErrInsufficientCapacity } return nil }
capacity.Used comes from the in-memory ent.User that was hydrated once at the beginning of the request — pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/dbfs.go:
go func (f DBFS) Capacity(ctx context.Context, u ent.User) (fs.Capacity, error) { ... res.Used = f.user.Storage // captured at request start res.Total = requesterGroup.MaxStorage return res, nil }
No SELECT is issued at check time, no row lock is taken on the user row, and pending upload sessions are not counted.
Stage B — the charge (single unconditional UPDATE, outside the tx) — pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/upload.go → inventory/tx.go → inventory/user.go:
go // PrepareUpload: check (A) ... then, many statements later ... if err := f.validateUserCapacity(ctx, req.Props.Size, ancestor.Owner()); err != nil { return nil, err } ... if err := inventory.CommitWithStorageDiff(ctx, dbTx, f.l, f.userClient); err != nil { ... } // charge (B)
// inventory/user.go c.client.User.Update().Where(user.ID(uid)).AddStorage(diff).Exec(ctx) // SQL: storage = storage + diff
Between A and B the code performs storage-policy load-balancing, save-path generation, encryption-metadata generation, transaction start, placeholder-file/entity creation, and metadata upsert. This leaves a wide race window. N concurrent PrepareUpload requests each read the same stale Used snapshot at A, each pass their independent quota check, and then each add their own size to users.storage at B. The committed total is up to N × size above MaxStorage.
Three defensive controls that would each independently close the race are missing:
1. The check and the charge are not enclosed in the same transaction with a SELECT ... FOR UPDATE on the user row. 2. The charge is a plain storage = storage + :size UPDATE, not an atomic conditional update of the form UPDATE users SET storage = storage + :size WHERE id = :uid AND storage + :size <= :maxstorage. 3. Used is computed only from committed entities. Concurrent pending upload sessions (which have already been reserved by the accounting model) are not counted, so races among sessions that haven't yet completed are invisible to each other.
Other sources
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.18.0, PrepareUpload in pkg/filemanager/fs/dbfs/upload.go checks a stale in-memory user storage value through validateUserCapacity and later applies an unconditional storage charge outside the same quota-enforcing transaction. An authenticated user with Files.Write permission can issue concurrent upload-session requests that read the same capacity snapshot, all pass the MaxStorage check, and reserve their declared sizes through CommitWithStorageDiff. The resulting reservations can exceed the account quota and can be materialized as chunked uploads that exhaust host storage and deny uploads to other users. The default local-storage policy and default User group are affected. This issue is fixed in version 4.18.0.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
go/github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.0.0-20260715025621-7329602751c0 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Cloudreveto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.18.0
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can exploit this issue?
An authenticated Cloudreve user with the Files.Write permission can exploit it. The default User group is affected, so deployments using default group permissions may expose ordinary users to this attack.
Is the default storage configuration affected?
Yes. The default local-storage policy is affected, along with the default User group.
What does an attacker need to do to bypass quota limits?
They need to submit concurrent upload-session requests so multiple requests validate against the same stale storage-capacity snapshot. The requests can then reserve more storage than the account quota permits.
What is the practical impact of successful exploitation?
The attacker can exceed their assigned storage quota and materialize the reservations through chunked uploads. This can exhaust host storage and prevent other users from uploading files.
What version addresses the issue?
Cloudreve 4.18.0 fixes this issue. Versions prior to 4.18.0 are affected.