CVE-2026-78693: Incomplete redaction re-attaches the original error path in AshGraphql, leaking internal field names

Published Aug 30, 2026
·
Updated

Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ashgraphql allows a remote client to read internal field names that an application configured its errorhandler to redact.

In AshGraphql.Errors, each error is passed to the configured errorhandler and the returned map is merged with the pre-handler path via Map.putnew(handled, :path, path). Because putnew defers to the handler only when the handler itself set :path, a sanitizing handler that returns a fresh map or deletes :path has that decision reverted. The re-injected path comes from builderrorpath/5, which falls back to raw internal Ash attribute and argument names when no fieldnames mapping is configured. A validation failure on a non-exposed or nested field therefore returns internal names in the GraphQL error path, defeating the application's redaction.

This issue affects ashgraphql: from 1.9.0 before 1.11.0.

Affected Software

1 affected component
ash-project/ash_graphql>1.9.0<1.11.0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade ash-project ash_graphql to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.11.0

Event History

Aug 30, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·06:28 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·06:28 PM
DescriptionWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which applications are exposed to internal field-name disclosure?

Applications using ash_graphql versions from 1.9.0 before 1.11.0 are affected when they rely on an error_handler to redact or remove GraphQL error paths. Disclosure is possible when build_error_path/5 falls back to raw Ash attribute or argument names because no field_names mapping is configured.

2

What does an attacker need to do to trigger the disclosure?

A remote client needs to cause a validation failure involving a non-exposed or nested field. The resulting GraphQL error path can reveal internal Ash field or argument names.

3

Is configuring an error_handler to remove the path sufficient mitigation?

No. If the handler returns a fresh map or deletes :path, AshGraphql re-attaches the pre-handler path through Map.put_new, unless the handler explicitly sets its own :path value.

4

What can be done before upgrading?

Configure field_names mappings so error paths do not fall back to raw internal Ash attribute and argument names. An error_handler can also explicitly set :path, rather than merely deleting it, to prevent the pre-handler path from being inserted.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203