CVE-2026-82672: Unvalidated chunk-size line tail in Mint HTTP/1 client enables response smuggling against strict intermediaries on pooled connections

Published Sep 19, 2026
·
Updated

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on a pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.

Mint.HTTP1.Parse.chunksize/1 in lib/mint/http1/parse.ex stops at the first non-hexadecimal byte of a chunked response's chunk-size line and returns the remainder unexamined. Mint.HTTP1.decodebody/5 in lib/mint/http1.ex then discards every byte up to the CRLF with Parse.ignoreuntilcrlf/1, so the accepted grammar is a run of hex digits followed by arbitrary bytes, where RFC 9112 permits only a ;-introduced chunk extension. Lines such as 5ZZZZZ and 5 9 are accepted as chunk size 5, and 0ZZZZ is accepted as the terminating chunk that ends the message body. An RFC-strict intermediary rejects such a line while Mint accepts it, so the two disagree on chunk boundaries and on where the response ends.

This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.10.1.

Affected Software

1 affected component
elixir-mint/mint>0.1.0<=1.10.1

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade elixir-mint mint to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.10.1

Event History

Sep 19, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·05:00 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·05:00 PM
DescriptionWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed?

Deployments using mint versions from 0.1.0 before 1.10.1 are affected when they use the HTTP/1 client and reuse pooled connections. Exploitation also depends on a malicious HTTP/1 server response being interpreted differently by Mint and an RFC-strict intermediary.

2

What does an attacker need to send?

The attacker needs to control an HTTP/1 server response and provide chunked transfer encoding with a chunk-size line that starts with hexadecimal digits but has an invalid trailing value before the CRLF. Examples given include "5ZZZZZ", "5 9", and "0ZZZZ".

3

Why are pooled connections relevant?

The desynchronization can poison the response queue for later requests that share the same connection. A malicious response can therefore affect how subsequent responses on that pooled connection are associated with requests.

4

What version resolves the issue?

Upgrade Mint to version 1.10.1 or later. Versions before 1.10.1, starting at 0.1.0, are listed as affected.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203