CVE-2026-88014: rclone archive/zip: Zip Slip via unsanitized zip entry names lets a malicious archive escape its own namespace
Summary backend/archive mounts a zip file as a browsable, syncable rclone Fs (e.g. rclone lsf :zip:downloaded.zip or rclone copy :zip:downloaded.zip dest:). Go's archive/zip package does not sanitize file.Name - it is taken verbatim from the untrusted zip's central directory. readZip() in backend/archive/zip/zip.go applies path.Clean to the entry name, but this alone cannot fully neutralize a name with more .. components than real segments preceding them (e.g. "../../etc/cron.d/evil" stays exactly as-is after cleaning). When the archive is mounted with an empty root (the common case), there was no check at all that the resulting name stayed inside the archive's own namespace, so it was stored verbatim and returned unchanged by Object.Remote().
fs/sync/fs/operations use srcObj.Remote() directly as the destination-relative path when copying between filesystems, so a maliciously crafted zip file can cause rclone copy/sync to attempt writes outside the intended destination directory on whatever backend it targets - this is the well-known "Zip Slip" vulnerability class (https://security.snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability) applied to rclone's own zip-mounting backend. It is distinct from cmd/archive/extract, which already validates via its own destPath() choke point and is not affected.
Details Vulnerable code (before fix), backend/archive/zip/zip.go, (Fs).readZip: go for , file := range zr.File { remote := strings.Trim(path.Clean(file.Name), "/") if remote == "." { remote = "" } remote = path.Join(f.prefix, remote) if f.root != "" { // Ignore all files outside the root if !strings.HasPrefix(remote, f.root) { continue } ... } ... o := &Object{f: f, remote: remote, ...} dt.Add(o) } The escape check only ran when f.root != "", and even then used a bare strings.HasPrefix with no boundary check (so f.root="foo" incorrectly also matched a sibling entry "foobar").
PoC Built a zip in memory with Go's real archive/zip writer (entry name "../../etc/cron.d/evil", not sanitized by the writer either), wrote it to disk, and mounted it via the actual production constructor zip.New(ctx, localFs, "evil.zip", "", ""): zip entry Name="../../etc/cron.d/evil" -> Object.Remote()="../../etc/cron.d/evil" Fully outside the archive's own namespace - confirmed via a regression test that mounts the malicious zip through the real local backend and inspects the resulting Fs's internal dirtree and every Object's Remote().
Impact A user who runs rclone copy/sync/mount against an untrusted zip file (downloaded, e-mailed, etc.) can have files written outside the intended destination directory on the destination backend, depending on that backend's own confinement. No server compromise or custom remote configuration is required from the attacker - only a crafted zip file and a normal rclone copy/sync invocation by the victim.
Fix Skip any zip entry whose cleaned+prefixed name still escapes the archive's own namespace, rather than exposing it. Also tightened the pre-existing root filter's weak prefix check.
Other sources
rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.72.0 until 1.75.1, the archive ZIP backend method (Fs).readZip in backend/archive/zip/zip.go accepts archive/zip.File.Name values from an untrusted central directory and exposes cleaned entry names without ensuring that they remain inside the archive namespace. Entries such as ../../etc/cron.d/evil can survive path.Clean and become Object.Remote() values that fs/sync and fs/operations use as destination-relative paths, allowing rclone copy or sync to write outside the selected destination on backends that do not independently confine the path. The non-empty root check also used strings.HasPrefix without a path boundary, so root foo could incorrectly include sibling foobar entries. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
go/github.com/rclone/rcloneto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.75.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
rcloneto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.75.1
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are exposed?
rclone versions from 1.72.0 through 1.75.1 are affected when using the archive ZIP backend with ZIP archives whose entry names are attacker-controlled. Exposure depends on copying or syncing from such an archive to a destination backend that does not independently constrain destination-relative paths.
What does an attacker need to exploit this issue?
An attacker needs to supply or influence a malicious ZIP archive containing crafted central-directory entry names, such as ../../etc/cron.d/evil. A user must then perform an rclone copy or sync operation involving the archive ZIP backend.
What is the impact of exploitation?
Crafted ZIP entry names can be treated as destination-relative paths and cause writes outside the selected destination namespace. The issue can also cause a configured archive root such as foo to include entries under a sibling prefix such as foobar.
What should be done if patching cannot happen immediately?
Do not copy or sync untrusted ZIP archives through the archive ZIP backend to destinations that do not enforce path confinement. Restrict archive inputs to trusted sources until version 1.75.1 can be deployed.
How can I determine whether an archive may be malicious?
Inspect ZIP central-directory entry names for absolute or traversal-style paths, especially names containing ../ that could resolve outside the intended archive root. Also check for entries whose names begin with a configured root string but are not actually within that root, such as foobar when the intended root is foo.