CVE-2026-90015: xhci: fix lost bounce buffers on TDs spanning several ring segments

Published Sep 16, 2026
·
Updated

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xhci: fix lost bounce buffers on TDs spanning several ring segments

When a TD reaches a link TRB with data that is not aligned to the endpoint's wMaxPacketSize, xhcialigntd() stages the unalignable tail through the bounce buffer of the ring segment holding that link TRB. xhciunmaptdbouncebuffer() later unmaps it and, for IN transfers, copies the data back into the URB's buffer.

The enqueue path records the segment that was bounced in td->bounceseg, under the assumption that a TD never spans more than two ring segments. That assumption does not hold: a TD large enough to span three or more segments crosses several link TRBs and can be bounced at each of them. Only the last one survives in td->bounceseg, so every earlier bounce buffer is neither copied back nor DMA unmapped.

The URB still completes with actuallength equal to the requested length and no error, so the transfer looks successful while a wMaxPacketSize sized hole in the destination buffer silently keeps its previous contents. It also leaks a DMA mapping per dropped bounce.

Any sufficiently large and fragmented bulk transfer can hit this. It was found with a USB mass storage device behind xHCI backing a dm-verity target with 512 byte hash blocks, where the stale data is detected rather than silently consumed. The device enumerates as SuperSpeed, so wMaxPacketSize is 1024, while dm-bufio issues one 512 byte bio per hash block. verityprefetchio() makes the block layer merge hundreds of them into a single request of up to 512 scatterlist entries of 512 bytes each. At 256 TRBs per ring segment such a TD spans three segments, and every segment boundary falls on an odd multiple of 512, i.e. unaligned to wMaxPacketSize. dm-bufio then caches a hash block holding stale data and dm-verity declares the metadata block corrupted:

device-mapper: verity: 8:2: metadata block 10850 is corrupted

A reproducer running this under qemu is available at https://github.com/baloo/xhci-verity

The bounce state (bouncebuf, bouncedma, bouncelen, bounceoffs) already lives on the ring segment, so there is nothing extra to track. Keep recording the last bounced segment in td->bounceseg and, on completion, walk the segments from td->startseg up to it, unmapping every segment that still has a pending bounce.

Stopping at td->bounceseg rather than td->endseg matters: a bounce implies the TD continues past that segment's link TRB, so bounceseg is always strictly before endseg, and a later TD may already have started in endseg and been bounced there. Walking that far would copy a foreign bounce buffer into this URB and unmap it twice. It also keeps the walk correct if a TD ever wraps the whole ring so that endseg == startseg.

[mn: Add ring->numsegs check to prevent unlikely infinite for loop.]

Affected Software

1 affected component
Linux Kernel

Event History

Sep 16, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·10:33 AM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·10:33 AM
Description

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What transfer pattern is required to trigger the issue?

A sufficiently large, fragmented bulk transfer must span three or more ring segments and encounter link TRBs whose data is not aligned to the endpoint's wMaxPacketSize. Multiple bounce buffers can then be used during one transfer descriptor.

2

What is the practical impact on completed transfers?

For IN transfers, earlier bounced portions are not copied back into the URB buffer, leaving a wMaxPacketSize-sized region containing its previous contents. The URB can still report the requested actual_length and no error, making the transfer appear successful.

3

How could an affected system be recognized?

Look for large fragmented bulk IN transfers that complete successfully but contain stale data holes of wMaxPacketSize size. Each dropped earlier bounce buffer also leaves behind a DMA mapping.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203