CVE-2026-92681: @neo4j/graphql: schema-level and type-level @authentication not enforced on top-level @cypher fields

Published Oct 12, 2026
·
Updated

In @neo4j/graphql versions up to and including 7.6.3, @authentication directives applied at the schema level or on the Query or Mutation types are silently ignored for top-level fields annotated with @cypher. Only @authentication directives placed directly on the individual fields are enforced. An application that exposes a top-level @cypher field and relies on schema-level or type-level @authentication to protect it allows unauthenticated callers to invoke the field and run the configured Cypher statement with the privileges of the GraphQL service account, which may permit reading and modifying data. Fixed in 7.6.4.

Affected Software

1 affected component
npm/@neo4j/graphql<=7.6.3

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade @neo4j/graphql to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 7.6.4

Event History

Oct 12, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·03:09 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·03:09 PM
RemedyDescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·04:17 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed?

Deployments using @neo4j/graphql version 7.6.3 or earlier are exposed if they publish a top-level Query or Mutation field annotated with @cypher and rely on schema-level or type-level @authentication to restrict access.

2

Does an attacker need credentials or user interaction?

No. The reported vector requires neither privileges nor user interaction; an unauthenticated caller can invoke an affected top-level @cypher field.

3

What can an unauthenticated caller do through an affected field?

They can execute the Cypher statement configured for that field using the GraphQL service account's privileges. Depending on those privileges and the statement, this may allow data reading or modification.

4

What can be done before upgrading?

Place @authentication directly on each affected top-level @cypher field, since field-level directives are enforced. Upgrade to version 7.6.4 to obtain the fix.

5

How can I identify affected fields?

Review the GraphQL schema for top-level Query or Mutation fields with @cypher. Fields that lack a directly applied @authentication directive but are expected to inherit authentication from the schema, Query type, or Mutation type should be treated as affected.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203