CVE-2026-93600: rustls webpki Name Constraints URI Validation Bypass

Published Sep 18, 2026
·
Updated

rustls-webpki (rustls/webpki) versions 0.101.0 through 0.103.11 and 0.104.0-alpha releases before 0.104.0-alpha.6 ignore X.509 name constraints that apply to URI names, causing such constraints to be accepted rather than enforced. Because name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly issued certificates, the flaw is only reachable after successful signature verification and requires a misissued certificate to exploit; the library also provides no API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise unimplemented. Versions 0.103.12 and 0.104.0-alpha.6 reject URI name constraints unconditionally.

Affected Software

4 affected components
rustls webpki>=0.101.0<=0.103.11
rustls webpki>0.103.11<=0.104.0-alpha.6
rustls webpki<0.104.0-alpha.6
rustls webpki=0.104.0-alpha.6

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade rustls-webpki (rustls/webpki) to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.104.0-alpha.6
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade rustls-webpki (rustls/webpki) to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.103.12

Event History

Sep 18, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·01:20 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·01:20 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are realistically exposed?

Deployments using rustls-webpki 0.101.0 through 0.103.11, or 0.104.0-alpha releases before 0.104.0-alpha.6, may be exposed when certificate validation encounters X.509 URI name constraints. Exploitation also depends on a misissued certificate with otherwise successful signature verification.

2

What does an attacker need for exploitation?

An attacker needs a misissued certificate that passes signature verification and relies on URI name constraints that should have restricted that certificate. A validly signed certificate by itself is not sufficient unless the relevant URI name-constraint condition is present.

3

How can I determine whether the installed library version is affected?

Versions 0.101.0 through 0.103.11 are affected, as are 0.104.0-alpha versions earlier than 0.104.0-alpha.6. Version 0.103.12 and 0.104.0-alpha.6 reject URI name constraints unconditionally.

4

What should be done if URI name constraints are encountered?

Upgrade to 0.103.12 or 0.104.0-alpha.6, where URI name constraints are rejected unconditionally. The library provides no API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise unimplemented.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203