CVE-2026-97902: fs: don't return -EINVAL for successful nested thaw

Published Sep 25, 2026
·
Updated

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs: don't return -EINVAL for successful nested thaw

Commit 7366f8b6fc6a ("fs: handle freezing from multiple devices") replaced the freezeholders bitmask with per-holder counters to allow nested freezes. In the bitmask version, a thaw that released a shared hold while another holder remained returned 0. Since the rework, thawsuperlocked() drops the freeze reference via freezedec() but then returns -EINVAL when other freezers remain, misinforming the caller: the thaw did succeed, the superblock just stays frozen for the remaining holders.

This breaks bdev-initiated freezing. When a filesystem is frozen with FIFREEZE and additionally frozen via bdevfreeze() -- which nests by design, see fsbdevfreeze() -- the subsequent bdevthaw() receives -EINVAL from the holder op although its freeze reference was dropped, and therefore keeps bdfsfreezecount elevated. Then device-mapper's unlockfs() ignores bdevthaw()'s return value, so nothing rebalances the count. After the user's FITHAW and umount, the block device can never be mounted again:

dm-1: Can't mount, blockdev is frozen

There is no way for userspace to drop the leaked count; only destroying the block device (or a reboot) recovers the device.

Reproducer (any kernel since v6.8):

dmsetup create dut --table "0 $(blockdev --getsz "$DEV") linear $DEV 0" mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/dut mount /dev/mapper/dut /mnt fsfreeze --freeze /mnt # freezeucount == 1 dmsetup suspend dut # bdfsfreezecount == 1, ucount == 2 dmsetup resume dut # ucount 2 -> 1, but thawsuper() # returns -EINVAL, so bdevthaw() # keeps bdfsfreezecount at 1 fsfreeze --unfreeze /mnt # filesystem thaws fine umount /mnt mount /dev/mapper/dut /mnt # EBUSY, forever

The same happens with fsfreeze held across an LVM snapshot of the origin volume.

fsbdevthaw()'s documentation already describes the intended semantics: "If this function returns zero it doesn't mean that the filesystem is unfrozen as it may have been frozen multiple times". Restore them by returning 0 when a nested thaw drops its hold while other freezers remain. Thawing without holding a freeze still fails with -EINVAL as mayunfreeze() rejects that case before the reference count is touched.

Affected Software

1 affected component
Linux Linux kernel>=6.8

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Patch 7366f8b6fc6a

Event History

Sep 25, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·10:22 AM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·10:22 AM
Description
Data Sourced
via NVD·11:17 AM
Description

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What sequence can leave a block device permanently frozen?

The issue occurs when a filesystem is frozen with FIFREEZE and also frozen through bdev_freeze(), which nests the freeze. A later bdev_thaw() drops its freeze reference but reports -EINVAL while another freezer remains; after the user performs FITHAW and unmounts, the device can remain frozen and cannot be mounted again.

2

Which environments are most directly affected?

Systems using device-mapper are directly implicated because its unlock_fs() ignores the bdev_thaw() return value, leaving bd_fsfreeze_count elevated. The described failure requires overlapping userspace FIFREEZE/FITHAW activity and block-device freezing.

3

How can administrators recognize the affected state?

After the described freeze, thaw, and unmount sequence, attempts to mount the block device fail because it remains frozen. The reported kernel message is "dm-1: Can't mount, blockdev is frozen".

4

Is there a userspace recovery once the device reaches this state?

No. The description states that userspace has no way to drop the remaining elevated freeze count after this sequence.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203