GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm: Command Injection
Summary
launch-editor checked fs.existsSync(fileName) before passing a supplied path to an editor command. On Windows, an attacker can bypass this check with a crafted path ending in \\..:line:column. This removes the requirement that the attacker be able to place a file with a malicious filename.
Combined with the % escaping issue described in GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv, this bypass can lead to OS command injection when an attacker controls the file argument.
Impact
Only apps that runs on Windows is affected.
Details
The earlier advisory assumed that fs.existsSync() required an attacker-controlled filename to exist. This advisory covers a bypass of that requirement.
A crafted value ending in \\..:1:1 is interpreted differently by launch-editor-middleware, launch-editor, and Windows:
1. launch-editor-middleware calls path.resolve() while the final path component is ..:1:1, so it is not treated as a parent-directory component. 2. launch-editor treats :1:1 as a line-and-column suffix and removes it, leaving a path ending in \\... 3. On Windows, fs.existsSync() accepts the resulting path as the existing parent directory even though the attacker-controlled preceding component does not exist. 4. Because the existence check passes, the crafted filename reaches the Windows shell command.
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/vite-plusto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 1.1.0 - Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/viteto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 6.4.4 - Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/viteto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 7.3.7 - Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/viteto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 8.1.6 - Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/viteto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 8.2.4 - Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/viteto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 8.3.3 - Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/launch-editorto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 2.14.2
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are affected?
Only applications running on Windows are affected.
What does an attacker need to control?
An attacker must be able to control the file argument passed into the affected flow. A crafted path ending in \..:1:1 can bypass the existence check without requiring the attacker to create a file with a malicious filename.
When can this lead to command injection?
The bypass can lead to OS command injection when combined with the % escaping issue covered by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv and the attacker controls the file argument.