GHSA-82fw-gwwq-j7x9: Path Traversal

Published Sep 8, 2026
·
Updated

Summary @vitest/mocker registers a redirect mock's target path without validating it against the dev server's file-serving allowlist. An attacker who can reach the dev server's WebSocket can register a redirect mock pointing outside the project root; when the mocked module is requested, the plugin's load hook returns readFile(<attacker path>) as the module source, disclosing local files.

This is exploitable without authentication only through the public mockerPlugin / standalone interceptorPlugin exports (used by third-party dev servers), which register the handler on Vite's unauthenticated HMR socket. Vitest's own browser mode registers mocks over a token-authenticated RPC and is not remotely reachable by default (see Scope).

Affected code packages/mocker/src/node/interceptorPlugin.ts.

The load hook is the file-read sink:

ts if (mock.type === 'redirect') { return readFile(mock.redirect, 'utf-8') }

mock.redirect is derived from client input at registration time with no boundary check:

ts if (event.type === 'redirect') { const redirectUrl = new URL(event.redirect) event.redirect = join(server.config.root, redirectUrl.pathname) } registry.register(event)

There is no server.fs.allow / server.fs.deny check and no assertion that the resolved path stays within the project root.

Registration paths and trust boundaries - Public mockerPlugin / interceptorPlugin (unauthenticated). In configureServer, the plugin registers server.ws.on('vitest:interceptor:register', …) on Vite's HMR WebSocket. That socket performs no token, Origin, or same-origin check, so any client that can reach it can register a redirect mock. This is the path the "unauthenticated" impact applies to. - Vitest browser mode (authenticated). Mocks register over the browser RPC (registerMock), which sits behind a per-run token (isValidApiRequest, a random api.token). The interceptor's configureServer socket is not used for registration here (in v5 it does not run at all, as the plugin is injected per environment). The same missing boundary check exists on the authenticated RPC path, but reaching it requires the token, so it is not a remote-unauthenticated read.

Path handling new URL(redirect).pathname combined with join(root, pathname) does not confine reads to the root:

- Special/hierarchical schemes (file:, http:) are normalized by WHATWG URL, so .. segments are collapsed and the result stays under the root. Payloads of the form file:///../../etc/passwd do not escape. - A non-special (opaque) scheme preserves .. in pathname, so join(root, "../../…/etc/passwd") resolves outside the root and reads an arbitrary file.

Even without escaping the root, the missing server.fs check allows reading any in-root file the dev server would otherwise refuse to serve (for example an in-root .env or source that is denied by server.fs.deny).

Scope / preconditions - This is a development-server issue. The dev server binds to localhost by default and is not reachable from the network unless the developer exposes it (server.host / 0.0.0.0, a LAN bind, or a proxy). - A raw (non-browser) client against a reachable server bypasses browser origin and CORS protections entirely and can both register the mock and read the response. - A browser-based drive-by against a localhost server is substantially mitigated by Vite defaults: the default CORS origin allowlist is limited to localhost origins, and server.allowedHosts blocks DNS-rebinding, so a cross-origin page cannot read the file contents back.

Impact Disclosure of local files readable by the dev-server process (source, in-root .env/secrets, and, via the opaque-scheme payload, files outside the project root). No integrity or availability impact.

Affected versions Present since @vitest/mocker was introduced.

- Affected: @vitest/mocker >= 2.1.0 (shipped in vitest and @vitest/browser >= 2.1.0), through 4.1.x and the 5.0.0 pre-releases. - Fixed: Vitest 4.1.11 and 5.0.0. Older majors (2.1.x, 3.x) are not maintained and are not planned to receive the fix.

Fix Validate the resolved redirect target against Vite's file-serving allowlist (isFileLoadingAllowed) before registering it, at every registration site, and stop registering the interceptor WebSocket events in Vitest's browser mode (mocks there flow through the authenticated RPC).

Affected Software

4 affected componentsFixes available
npm/@vitest/mocker>=5.0.0-beta.1<5.0.0-rc.2
5.0.0-rc.2
npm/vitest>=5.0.0-beta.1<5.0.0-rc.2
5.0.0-rc.2
npm/vitest>=2.1.0<4.1.11
4.1.11
npm/@vitest/mocker>=2.1.0<4.1.11
4.1.11

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/@vitest/mocker to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.0.0-rc.2
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/vitest to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.0.0-rc.2
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/vitest to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 4.1.11
  4. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/@vitest/mocker to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 4.1.11
  5. Upgrade

    Upgrade vitest to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 4.1.11
  6. Upgrade

    Upgrade vitest to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 5.0.0
  7. Upgrade

    Upgrade @vitest/mocker to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.1.0

Event History

Sep 8, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·08:46 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·08:46 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed to unauthenticated remote exploitation?

Deployments using the public mockerPlugin or standalone interceptorPlugin exports in a third-party dev server are exposed if an attacker can reach that server's WebSocket. These exports register the handler on Vite's unauthenticated HMR socket.

2

Is Vitest browser mode remotely exploitable by default?

Vitest's own browser mode registers mocks through a token-authenticated RPC and is not remotely reachable by default. The advisory identifies the unauthenticated exposure specifically with the public plugin exports used by third-party dev servers.

3

What must an attacker do to obtain file contents?

The attacker must be able to connect to the affected dev server's WebSocket, register a redirect mock targeting a path outside the project root, and cause the mocked module to be requested. The plugin then reads the target path and returns its contents as module source.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203