GHSA-8gr3-5j6f-25gp: XSS
Summary
The @novu/js In-App Inbox renderer passes a notification's redirect.url to window.open() with no URL-scheme validation. The value originates from a notification's call-to-action and is delivered to the recipient verbatim.
An authenticated organization member (or any holder of the environment API key) creates a v1 in-app workflow whose step CTA stores cta.data = { url: "javascript:<payload>", target: "self" }. The v1 message-template cta.data field is a Mongoose Mixed type, so the arbitrary target key is accepted and persisted. The server-side inbox mapper copies cta.data.url and cta.data.target into the notification's redirect object with no scheme check. Novu's v2 control schema validates redirect URLs against redirectUrlRegex (which rejects javascript:), proving the intended invariant; the v1 path and the client renderer do not enforce it.
When the recipient clicks the notification, the inbox calls window.open(url, "self", "noopener noreferrer"). In Chromium browsers a javascript: URL opened with target="self" executes in the current document origin (the default blank is browser-blocked, so the attacker sets self).
Result: a low-privilege content author runs arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of every recipient who clicks, in the origin that hosts the inbox (the customer application or the self-hosted Novu dashboard, neither of which sends a CSP).
Affected
novuhq/novu self-hosted and cloud, API <= v3.15.0; @novu/js <= 3.15.0 and @novu/react (Inbox component). Confirmed live-exploitable on v3.15.0 (Docker community compose, default config, default roles). Condition: an in-app (Inbox) channel is in use, the standard product configuration. Recipient must use a Chromium-based browser (Chrome, Edge); the javascript: execution does not occur where the browser blocks javascript: in window.open.
Root cause
packages/js/src/ui/context/InboxContext.tsx:108: window.open(url, target ?? DEFAULTTARGET, DEFAULTREFERRER) is reached for any URL not starting with /, with no scheme allowlist, so javascript: is passed through. packages/js/src/ui/components/Notification/DefaultNotification.tsx:103: the notification click handler calls navigate(redirect.url, redirect.target), feeding the stored values into the sink. apps/api/src/app/inbox/utils/notification-mapper.ts:85-89: maps cta.data.url and cta.data.target into redirect with no validation of either field. libs/dal/src/repositories/message-template/message-template.schema.ts:41: data: Schema.Types.Mixed accepts the arbitrary target key (not present in the typed interface). libs/application-generic/src/usecases/compile-in-app-template/compile-in-app-template.usecase.ts:35-36: the v1 render path handlebars-compiles cta.data.url and performs no scheme check. libs/application-generic/src/schemas/control/in-app-control.schema.ts:24-27: the v2 control schema enforces url: z.string().regex(redirectUrlRegex) which rejects javascript:, the guard absent from the v1 path and the renderer.
Reproduction
novuhq/novu v3.15.0 Docker community compose, default config. Attacker holds an environment API key (or a member session); victim opens the inbox in Chromium.
1. Create a v1 in-app workflow with a redirect CTA carrying a javascript: URL and target=self: POST /v1/workflows Authorization: ApiKey <key> {"name":"poc","notificationGroupId":"<ng>","active":true, "steps":[{"template":{"type":"inapp","content":"click me", "cta":{"type":"redirect","data":{ "url":"javascript:window.top.X=document.domain;void 0","target":"self"}}}}]} 2. Trigger it to a subscriber, then read the feed with a subscriber token minted from the public application identifier (no secret): POST /v1/inbox/session {"applicationIdentifier":"<appId>","subscriberId":"<sub>"} GET /v1/inbox/notifications Authorization: Bearer <subscriber-jwt> -> redirect: {"url":"javascript:window.top.X=document.domain;void 0","target":"self"} 3. The subscriber clicks the notification in the @novu/js / @novu/react Inbox.
Live-verified: the stored javascript: URL is returned verbatim by the inbox feed, and the exact shipped navigate() logic invoked from a real click runs window.open(url,"self",...), executing the payload in the http://<dashboard>:4000 origin (no CSP); window.top.X was set to the page origin. On the self-hosted dashboard the test inbox bell uses subscriberId = user.externalId (apps/dashboard/src/components/inbox-button.tsx:102), so a member targets another member's id and the executing payload reads localStorage['self-hosted-jwt'] (apps/dashboard/src/utils/self-hosted/jwt-manager.tsx:4), the dashboard session token.
Impact
- Stored XSS in the recipient's browser, cross-principal (content author to end-user subscriber), persistent, replicated to every recipient of the workflow. - On the self-hosted dashboard origin (no CSP), theft of localStorage['self-hosted-jwt'] yields takeover of another member or admin account. - In a customer application embedding the inbox, session and token theft and authenticated actions in that origin. - Triggered by the lowest privilege that can author a workflow, default config, one recipient click.
Credit
Jan Kahmen, turingpoint (jan@turingpoint.de)
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/@novu/jsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.18.0
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can create a malicious notification?
An authenticated organization member can create it through a v1 in-app workflow. Anyone holding the environment API key can also create the affected workflow.
What must happen for code to execute in a recipient's browser?
The recipient must click the notification. The malicious CTA uses a javascript: URL and target _self; in Chromium browsers, this causes the payload to execute in the current document origin.
Which workflow path should be audited?
Audit v1 in-app workflow message templates, especially CTA data containing a URL with the javascript: scheme and a target value of _self. The v1 cta.data field accepts arbitrary target keys and the inbox mapper copies both URL and target into the notification redirect object.
What can be done while remediation is pending?
Restrict who can create v1 in-app workflows and limit access to the environment API key. Review existing v1 CTA data for javascript: URLs and _self targets before notifications are delivered.
Does the newer control schema enforce the expected URL restriction?
Yes. The v2 control schema validates redirect URLs with redirectUrlRegex, which rejects javascript: URLs; the described gap is in the v1 path and the client-side renderer.