GHSA-8wjv-2p76-3863: Medium severity pip/pyJWT vulnerability

Published Sep 29, 2026
·
Updated

Package

pyjwt (PyPI)

Affected versions

tested & verified on: 2.13.0. Every version whose PyJWS.load() translates only ValueError is affected

Description

PyJWS.looad() (jwt/apijws.py:337) splits the compact token, base64url decodes the header segment and hands it to json.loads() before verifysignature() runs. The parse is wrapped in except ValueError as e: raise DecodeError(...). That is what makes the documented contract sufficient for untrusted input: except jwt.PyJWTError (or InvalidTokenError) around jwt.decode(token, key, algorithms=[...]).

CPython's JSON decoder raises RecursionError (a RuntimeError subclass, not a ValueError) once nesting crosses the native stack guard. That exception leaves load(), then jwt.decode(), and matches no PyJWTError handlerr at all. No key and no valid signature are needed: the header is parsed first, so a single unauthenticated request with an unsigned token suffices.

Scope: the recursion threshold is ~65,000 nesting levels; below it the same input yields a clean DecodeError (a 346,800-byte flat header is rejected normally, so depth, not size, is the trigger). A token this large cannot ride in an Authorization header (rejected at HTTP field limits,431 under gunicorn), but body transport (RFC 7662 introspection style) is a standard pattern. Under Flask 3.1.3 / gunicorn 26.2.0 each crafted request returns HTTP 500 instead of 401 and writes a full traceback to the error log; the sync worker survives.

Proof of concept

Against any endpoint that validates a token from its JSON body with the documented pattern:

python import base64, json, http.client

def b64url(b): return base64.urlsafeb64encode(b).rstrip(b"=")

unsigned token: the header segment is 200,000 nested '[' (266,681 bytes total) token = (b64url(b"[" 200000) + b"." + b64url(b'{"a":1}') + b"." + b64url(b"x")).decode()

conn = http.client.HTTPConnection("127.0.0.1", 8125, timeout=30) conn.request("POST", "/api/protected", body=json.dumps({"token": token}), headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"}) print(conn.getresponse().status) # 500, expected 401

Determinism: 20/20 crafted requests returned 500 against the reference container (PyJWT 2.13.0, Flask 3.1.3, gunicorn 26.2.0, Python 3.14.7) in 0.12 s (about 6 ms per request in a tight loop, 14 ms for a cold request), each leaving a RecursionError: Stack overflow ... while decoding a JSON array traceback in the error log.

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can turn every request to a JWT validating endpoint into a server error with a full traceback logged per request, a cheap and repeatable denial of service on the authentication path (no crash, no data exposure).

Fix

Catch RecursionError alongside ValueError in load() and raise DecodeError, or parse the header with a nonrecursive, depthbounded parser.

Reproduction

A standalone package (docker-compose.yml, Dockerfile, requirements.txt, target app, driver) accompanies this report:

cd <package dir> docker compose up -d --build python3 poccheckthenattack.py docker compose down -v pocpyjwtrecursion.zip

Exit 0= reproduced (control checks green, exactly one crafted request returns 500, traceback verified in docker logs, service alive afterwards); 1 = not reproduced; 2 = checks failed, no attack sent. The package's runlog.txt documents a complete proof run.

Credits

- @Nivid42

Maintainer update — 2026-09-09

We reproduced the reported behavior on PyJWT 2.13.0: a deeply nested JSON array in the untrusted compact-JWS header reaches json.loads() before signature verification and raises RecursionError, which is not a PyJWTError. The same input is accepted by the public jwt.decode() path and can escape an application's normal except PyJWTError handling.

The fix is committed as 06573692ebcdec8831c3927513b3e87c31fbbb62. PyJWS.load() now translates both ValueError and RecursionError from header JSON parsing into DecodeError. A regression test covers the deeply nested-header path before signature verification. The full suite passes with 373 tests and 4 intentional cryptography-environment skips.

No release containing the fix has been published yet, so the patched version remains unset pending release planning. The advisory remains medium severity and unpublished.

Maintainer update — 2026-09-11

The verified fix for this advisory is included in PyJWT 2.14.0, released on 2026-09-11 and available on PyPI. PyJWT 2.14.0 is the first release containing the fix. This advisory is now published with 2.14.0 recorded as the patched version.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
pip/pyJWT>=2.13.0<2.14.0
2.14.0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade pip/pyJWT to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.14.0
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade PyJWT to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.14.0

Event History

Sep 29, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·11:43 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·11:43 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What does an attacker need to trigger the issue?

An attacker needs only to submit a crafted unsigned compact token whose header has roughly 65,000 JSON nesting levels. No signing key or valid signature is required because the header is parsed before signature verification.

2

Which deployments are realistically exposed?

Applications that pass attacker-controlled tokens to pyJWT decoding are exposed if their PyJWS._load() handler translates only ValueError. The affected behavior was tested and verified in pyJWT 2.13.0.

3

How can I tell whether the issue is being triggered?

A crafted deeply nested token header causes RecursionError to escape jwt.decode() instead of being returned as a jwt.PyJWTError or InvalidTokenError. Headers below the recursion threshold are rejected normally with DecodeError.

4

Is token size alone enough to trigger the problem?

No. The trigger is JSON nesting depth rather than header size: a 346,800-byte flat header was rejected normally, while approximately 65,000 nesting levels trigger the unhandled RecursionError.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203