GHSA-8x3q-jpjh-qh5c: SSRF

Published Aug 31, 2026
·
Updated

poc.zip Summary

elFinder 2.1.69 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass when PHP cURL is unavailable and URL uploads use the fsockgetcontents() fallback.

An attacker who can submit a URL for server-side upload can use an attacker-controlled DNS hostname that initially resolves to an allowed public IP address and subsequently resolves to a loopback or private IP address.

The URL validation checks the first resolved IP, but fsockgetcontents() opens the actual connection using the original hostname. This causes a second DNS resolution and allows the connection to reach an address different from the one that was validated.

The response from the internal service is saved as an uploaded file and can be read through elFinder. This makes the demonstrated issue a non-blind SSRF.

The most accurate classification is:

Vulnerability: SSRF protection bypass Exploitation technique: DNS rebinding Root cause: TOCTOU/double DNS resolution without IP pinning

Affected versions

Confirmed affected:

elFinder 2.1.69, commit 8f2c3ffafcdd52cf4515f1eec172f4eee44552ad the current master branch inspected on 24 July 2026

The earliest affected version has not been determined.

Preconditions

The demonstrated readback path requires:

PHP without the cURL extension (curlexec() unavailable); access to the URL upload functionality; permission to upload a MIME type returned by the target service; network connectivity from the PHP process to the internal target; DNS resolution behavior compatible with low or zero TTL responses.

Authentication requirements depend on the application integrating the elFinder connector. The attached reproduction connector is intentionally minimal and unauthenticated.

Technical details

validateaddress() resolves the supplied hostname with gethostbyname(), rejects loopback and private ranges, and stores the accepted address in $info['ip']:

https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2587-L2655

getremotecontents() then selects cURL when available, otherwise fsockgetcontents():

https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2673-L2689

The cURL implementation correctly pins the validated IP using CURLOPTRESOLVE:

https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2709-L2736

However, the socket fallback ignores $info['ip'] and connects using $arr['host']:

php $fp = fsockopen( $ssl . $arr['host'], $arr['port'], $errno, $errstr, $connecttimeout );

Relevant code:

https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L2762-L2866

Consequently, the address checked by validateaddress() is not necessarily the address used by the socket connection.

The same problem is present after redirects: the redirect URL is validated, but the recursive socket request again connects using the hostname rather than the validated IP.

Proof of concept

A Docker-based reproduction is attached as poc.zip.

The laboratory:

downloads the official elFinder 2.1.69 release during the build; verifies that the package version is 2.1.69; verifies that curlexec() is unavailable; does not modify the elFinder core; runs a deterministic DNS server and an HTTP service bound only to loopback.

Build and run:

sh docker build -t elfinder-ssrf-repro poc docker run --rm -p 127.0.0.1:8081:8081 elfinder-ssrf-repro

Open:

text http://127.0.0.1:8081/poc/index.html

In the elFinder interface:

1. Select "Upload". 2. Paste the following URL:

text http://rebind.test:9001/secret.txt

3. Wait for the upload to complete. 4. Open the resulting secret.txt file.

Observed content:

text INTERNALSECRETMANUAL

The PoC DNS server responds as follows:

text first A resolution -> 203.0.113.10 subsequent A resolutions -> 127.0.0.1

Expected logs include:

text DNS rebind.test type=1 answer=203.0.113.10 count=1 DNS rebind.test type=1 answer=127.0.0.1 count=2 GET /secret.txt

203.0.113.10 is used only as a deterministic laboratory address that passes the current private-address checks. The actual connection reaches 127.0.0.1:9001.

A redirect variant is also included:

text http://rebind.test:9001/redirect-secret

It produces the same readable internal content.

Security impact

An attacker may cause the elFinder server to issue HTTP GET requests to services reachable from the PHP process, including:

loopback services; private network services; link-local services where reachable; internal administrative or application endpoints.

Because the response body is saved and exposed through elFinder, sensitive internal information may be disclosed.

The demonstrated primitive is limited to HTTP GET requests and does not provide arbitrary request methods, bodies, or headers. Integrity and availability impact would depend on the behavior of reachable internal endpoints and are not claimed by this PoC.

Suggested CVSS

For an exposed connector matching the attached PoC:

text CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Base score: 8.6 High.

This assumes:

no authentication is required by the connector; the internal service represents a separate security scope; disclosure may include highly sensitive internal data.

If authenticated user access is considered an inherent prerequisite, PR:L would result in a score of 7.7 High.

Suggested remediation

The socket connection should use the IP address returned by validateaddress() rather than resolving the hostname again.

For HTTPS, the original hostname should still be used for:

the HTTP Host header; TLS SNI; certificate hostname validation.

This may require replacing fsockopen() with a connection mechanism that supports connecting to the validated IP while explicitly configuring the TLS peer name.

Every redirect destination should be independently validated and its validated IP pinned to that specific connection.

Revalidating the hostname immediately before connecting is not sufficient because it would still leave a validation-to-connection DNS resolution gap.

As a temporary mitigation, URL uploads could be rejected when cURL is unavailable, or deployments could configure urlUploadFilter to reject URL uploads.

Additional observation

After a successful URL fetch, the upload path calls:

php getheaders($url, true)

Relevant code:

https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/blob/2.1.69/php/elFinder.class.php#L3356-L3374

This performs another request using the original hostname without reusing the validated and pinned connection. It may therefore introduce an additional blind SSRF request, potentially even when the cURL download path is selected.

This additional request is not required for the attached non-blind fsockgetcontents() PoC. It should nevertheless be reviewed during remediation. Ideally, filename and response-header information should be collected from the already validated HTTP response instead of issuing a separate request.

Disclosure

Initial private report date: 24/07/2026

Reporter contact: Marco Lunardi - marcolunardi90@gmail.com

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
composer/studio-42/elfinder<=2.1.69
2.1.70

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade composer/studio-42/elfinder to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.1.70

Event History

Aug 31, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·08:28 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·08:28 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed to exploitation?

Deployments are exposed when elFinder allows attacker-controlled URL uploads and PHP cURL is unavailable, causing URL retrieval to use the fsock_get_contents() fallback. Confirmed affected code includes elFinder 2.1.69 at commit 8f2c3ffafcdd52cf4515f1eec172f4eee44552ad and the current master branch.

2

What does an attacker need to exploit this issue?

An attacker needs the ability to submit a URL for server-side upload and control a DNS hostname. The hostname must first resolve to an allowed public address during validation, then resolve to a loopback or private address when the upload connection is made.

3

What is the impact if exploitation succeeds?

The server can connect to an internal service at an address that was not approved by validation. The internal service response is saved as an uploaded file and can be read through elFinder, making the demonstrated SSRF non-blind.

4

What can be done before patching?

Prevent untrusted users from submitting URLs for server-side upload, eliminating the attacker-controlled input needed for the described flow. Ensure PHP cURL is available so URL uploads do not use the fsock_get_contents() fallback implicated in the bypass.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203