GHSA-c48m-32m9-vx93: Critical severity npm/vm2 vulnerability
Summary
vm2 is a sandbox library for isolating and executing untrusted JavaScript code inside a Node.js process. It can restrict access to built-in modules and external packages.
When NodeVM enables an external allowlist together with a custom resolve callback, vm2 checks the requested package name with a non-exact match. For example, if the allowlist only permits left-pad, an attacker can still bypass the check with a colliding package name such as evil-left-pad, because it contains the allowlisted name.
If the colliding package already exists in a host path resolvable by the custom resolver, or if the target application's custom resolver / dependency-management workflow downloads the package and places it in a resolvable path, vm2 loads and executes that package in the host context. This lets sandboxed code bypass the module allowlist and may further lead to host code execution.
Details
NodeVM supports require.external to configure which external npm packages sandboxed code may load. It also supports a custom resolver through require.resolve. This combination is commonly used in business plugin systems, user-script platforms, or sandbox execution environments: the application allows only a small set of trusted dependencies while using a custom resolver that points to the application's own package directory.
The vulnerability is in the allowlist pre-check logic before the custom resolver is called. vm2 generates a regular expression from the external allowlist and uses it to check the original package name supplied by sandboxed code. However, the regular expression is not anchored to the full package-name boundary, so it performs a substring match on the original package name.
For example, with the following configuration:
js new NodeVM({ require: { external: ['left-pad'], resolve: id => require.resolve(id, { paths: [customRoot] }), context: 'host', builtin: [] } })
The intended policy is that sandboxed code can only load left-pad. However, because vm2 uses a non-exact match similar to /left\-pad/ for the requested package name, names such as evil-left-pad and left-pad-backdoor also pass the allowlist pre-check.
After evil-left-pad passes the check, vm2 calls the custom resolver configured by the application. If the resolver can find that colliding package in a host-resolvable path, vm2 adds the returned path to the loadable list and, in context: 'host' mode, loads the package with the host require(). At that point, the package's top-level code executes in the host context instead of being constrained by sandbox restrictions such as NodeVM's builtin: [].
In local verification, the PoC only allows external: ['left-pad'] and sets builtin: [], so sandboxed code cannot directly load childprocess. However, after the sandboxed code executes require('evil-left-pad'), vm2 still loads the colliding package from a host path. The colliding package's top-level code successfully invokes the host childprocess module and prints HOSTEXEC.
This issue does not mean that vm2 automatically downloads malicious packages from npm at runtime. The attack requires the colliding package to already be in a path resolvable by the custom resolver, or for the target application's own dependency resolution / download workflow to place that package in such a path. This precondition limits the affected scenarios, but it does not change the core vulnerability: the external allowlist is not enforced against complete package-name boundaries, allowing sandboxed code to load a host package that the application did not authorize.
PoC
An independent PoC is attached in the poc directory. The PoC installs vm2 3.11.5, creates a temporary host package directory, and writes an unauthorized evil-left-pad package into it.
Run the following from the poc directory:
bash npm install node poc.js
When the vulnerability is present, the output is similar to:
text [+] vm2 version: 3.11.5 [+] customRoot: /tmp/vm2-resolver-poc-xxxxxx/custom [+] Direct sandbox require("childprocess") is blocked: ENOTFOUND [+] Unrelated package is blocked: ENOTFOUND [+] require("evil-left-pad") result: HOSTEXEC [+] RESULT: VULNERABLE
HOSTEXEC is produced by the top-level code of the evil-left-pad package through host-side childprocess.execFileSync(), demonstrating that the unauthorized package has executed in the host context.
Expected result: when the external allowlist only contains left-pad, evil-left-pad should be rejected.
Actual result: evil-left-pad passes the check because it contains the left-pad substring and then executes in the host context.
Impact
Under the affected configuration, an attacker can load a colliding host package that is not allowed by the external allowlist through sandboxed code, breaking NodeVM's module access control.
If the attacker can control or influence the contents of the colliding package, for example by placing a malicious package through a plugin upload directory, a user-controllable dependency directory, a private registry synchronization directory, an application-specific dependency download workflow, or another path reachable by the resolver, the attacker can further execute code in the host Node.js process context. The attacker may read files, environment variables, and secrets accessible to the host process, modify host-writable data, or interrupt the host service.
The main exploitation prerequisites are:
- The application uses vm2 NodeVM to execute untrusted or low-trust JavaScript code. - The application enables a require.external allowlist instead of allowing all external packages. - The application configures a custom require.resolve. - The colliding package already exists in a path resolvable by that custom resolver, or the application's workflow downloads / synchronizes it into that path. - The application loads external packages in the host context, or keeps the relevant default behavior.
If the deployed custom resolver only searches a fixed dependency directory that is fully trusted and cannot be influenced by an attacker, practical exploitability is reduced. However, in scenarios such as plugin systems, user scripts, uploadable dependency packages, private package-source synchronization, or multi-tenant sandbox platforms, this vulnerability can bypass the sandbox boundary.
Credit
This vulnerability was discovered by:
- XlabAI Team of Tencent Xuanwu Lab (xlabai@tencent.com) - Atuin Automated Vulnerability Discovery Engine - Guannan Wang (wgnbuaa@gmail.com), Zhanpeng Liu (pkugenuine@gmail.com), Jiashuo Liang (761232680@qq.com), Guancheng Li (lgcpku@gmail.com)
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/vm2to a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 3.11.7 - Compensating control
Configure the custom resolver to search only a fixed dependency directory that is fully trusted and cannot be influenced by attackers, preventing unauthorized colliding packages from being placed in a host-resolvable path.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which deployments are exposed to this issue?
Deployments using vm2's NodeVM are exposed when they enable a require.external allowlist and also configure a custom require.resolve callback. This pattern is commonly used for business plugin systems, user-script platforms, and other sandbox execution environments.
What must an attacker be able to do to exploit the bypass?
The attacker needs to run sandboxed code that can request a package whose name contains an allowed package name. A colliding package must also exist in a host path that the custom resolver can resolve, or be downloaded and placed in such a path by the application's resolver or dependency-management workflow.
Are applications that only use an external-package allowlist affected?
The described bypass specifically requires the combination of require.external and a custom require.resolve callback. The provided information does not identify an impact for an external allowlist used without a custom resolver.
How can I determine whether a deployment is already at risk?
Review NodeVM configuration for both an external package allowlist and a custom require.resolve implementation. Then check whether the resolver can locate packages with names that contain an allowlisted package name, including packages present in host-resolvable paths or introduced through dependency-management workflows.