GHSA-c7q8-3ch8-vqpv: XSS

Published Sep 8, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

Document.createProcessingInstruction() in @xmldom/xmldom performs no validation on the target parameter. The requireWellFormed: true serializer option validates only for : in the target and a case-insensitive xml prefix, but does not check for > characters. A > in the target breaks the processing instruction boundary (<?...?>), allowing injection of arbitrary content into the serialized XML output.

Details

Document.createProcessingInstruction(target, data) at lib/dom.js around line 2413 accepts any string as the target parameter and stores it on the PI node without validation.

During serialization, the requireWellFormed code path (around line 3286) performs two checks on PI targets:

1. Rejects targets containing : (namespace prefix check) 2. Rejects targets matching xml case-insensitively (reserved prefix)

However, it does NOT validate that the target conforms to the XML Name production, and critically does NOT check for > characters. Since processing instructions are serialized as <?target data?>, a > in the target prematurely closes the PI, causing the remaining content to be interpreted as document content by any downstream XML parser.

Root Cause

1. createProcessingInstruction() performs no validation on target 2. The serializer's requireWellFormed check is incomplete -- it only checks for : and xml, missing characters that break PI syntax (>, ?, whitespace) 3. The serializer emits the target verbatim: <?${target} ${data}?>

Proof of Concept

javascript const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom');

const impl = new DOMImplementation(); const serializer = new XMLSerializer(); const doc = impl.createDocument(null, 'root', null);

// PI target containing > breaks the PI boundary const pi = doc.createProcessingInstruction('a>', 'data'); doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi);

const output = serializer.serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); console.log(output); // Output: <root><?a> data?></root> // // The > in the target closes the PI prematurely. // A downstream XML parser sees: // - Processing instruction: <?a?> (target "a", no data) // - Text content: " data?>" // // requireWellFormed: true did NOT prevent the injection.

Injecting elements via PI target

javascript const pi2 = doc.createProcessingInstruction( 'a?><script xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">alert(1)</script><?b', '' ); doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi2);

const output2 = serializer.serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); console.log(output2); // Output includes: // <?a?><script xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">alert(1)</script><?b ?> // // The injected <script> element is valid XHTML that a browser would execute.

Impact

Applications that create processing instructions with user-controlled target strings and serialize the result are vulnerable to XML injection. This enables:

- XML structure injection: Breaking the PI boundary to inject arbitrary elements, text, or additional processing instructions into the output - XSS via XHTML: If the serialized output is served as XHTML or processed by a browser-based XML parser, injected script elements will execute - XXE chain: Injected DOCTYPE declarations or entity references could trigger XXE in downstream XML parsers that consume the output - requireWellFormed bypass: The existing well-formedness checks are incomplete and provide a false sense of security

Fix Applied

Under requireWellFormed, the serializer validates a processing-instruction target as an XML NCName (a Name with no colon) and rejects a case-insensitive xml, throwing InvalidStateError when the target is ill-formed — so a >, ?, or whitespace in the target is now refused.\ On 0.9.12 this replaces an earlier check that already rejected a colon or xml, so the no-colon rule is preserved.\ 0.8.15 had no processing-instruction target check at all, so the whole target validation is new there.\ Non-breaking and opt-in. See the XML Name production. ⚠ Opt-in required. Protection is not automatic. Existing serialization calls remain vulnerable unless { requireWellFormed: true } is explicitly passed. Applications that serialize untrusted DOM content should audit all serializeToString() call sites and add it.

Proof of Concept - fixed path

javascript const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom');

const impl = new DOMImplementation(); const serializer = new XMLSerializer(); const doc = impl.createDocument(null, 'root', null);

// PI target containing > breaks the PI boundary const pi = doc.createProcessingInstruction('a>', 'data'); doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi);

// Default path: emits the ill-formed target verbatim. console.log(serializer.serializeToString(doc)); // Output: <root><?a> data?></root>

// Opt-in path: the target check now rejects the break-out character. try { serializer.serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); } catch (e) { console.log(e.name); // InvalidStateError }

Why the default stays verbatim

W3C DOM Parsing's require-well-formed flag defaults to false, and the browser XMLSerializer emits the target verbatim in that default mode. Unconditionally throwing on an ill-formed PI target would diverge from that platform behavior and would be an unjustified breaking change, so the stricter validation is gated behind { requireWellFormed: true }. (See the W3C XML Name production and XML Processing Instructions.)

Residual limitation

The default serialization path still emits the ill-formed target verbatim -- only the opt-in requireWellFormed path is protected. Creation-time validation of the target in createProcessingInstruction() is breaking and is deferred to the next breaking release, tracked at xmldom/xmldom#1073.

Affected Software

3 affected componentsFixes available
npm/xmldom<=0.6.0
npm/@xmldom/xmldom>=0.9.0<=0.9.11
0.9.12
npm/@xmldom/xmldom>=0.7.0<=0.8.14
0.8.15

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/@xmldom/xmldom to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.9.12
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/@xmldom/xmldom to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.8.15
  3. Configuration

    When serializing documents that may include processing instructions created from user-controlled data, call serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }) to validate PI targets (rejects targets with '>', '?', or whitespace as well as reserved 'xml' case-insensitively).

    @xmldom/xmldom XML serialization (XMLSerializer.serializeToString) requireWellFormed = true

Event History

Sep 8, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·09:03 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·09:03 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Is the requireWellFormed serializer option sufficient to prevent exploitation?

No. With requireWellFormed: true, the serializer rejects targets containing a colon or an xml prefix, but it does not reject a greater-than character (>) in the target.

2

What attacker-controlled value is needed to exploit this issue?

An attacker needs influence over the target argument passed to Document.createProcessingInstruction(). A target containing > can terminate the serialized processing instruction early and inject content into the resulting XML.

3

Where should teams look to determine whether their application is exposed?

Review calls to Document.createProcessingInstruction(target, data), especially where target originates from untrusted input. Exposure also requires the resulting document to be serialized and consumed by a downstream XML processor or renderer.

4

Which packages are identified as affected?

The affected software listed is npm/@xmldom/xmldom and npm/xmldom.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203