GHSA-c9rx-x947-fp3h: Medium severity npm/sanitize-html vulnerability
Summary
Since 2.18.0, when an <iframe> is not allowed and disallowedTagsMode is 'discard' (the defaults), its raw-text content is re-sanitized by a recursive call to sanitizeHtml(text, options) (the change from #5564, fixing #5550). The recursion has no bound and starts each nested call with a fresh state. Two consequences, both absent from 2.17.7 and 2.17.4:
1. A few kilobytes of unclosed <iframe> tags throw RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded with the default options. Any application that sanitizes untrusted HTML with 2.18.0 can be made to throw on a small crafted input. 2. nestingLimit is not enforced across a discarded iframe: each nested iframe restarts the depth count at zero, so the output can be nested arbitrarily deep regardless of the configured limit.
Affected versions
- 2.18.0 (the current latest), and the main branch at the time of writing (the recursive call is still in packages/sanitize-html/index.js, in the ontext handler, branch tag === 'iframe' && !tagAllowed(tag) && options.disallowedTagsMode === 'discard'). - Not affected: 2.17.7 and 2.17.4 (tested with the same inputs below).
Tested with Node.js v26.7.0.
Reproduction 1: stack overflow with the default options
js const sanitizeHtml = require('sanitize-html');
// with 2.18.0: sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(1000)); // 8,000 chars: returns '' sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(2000)); // 16,000 chars: throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(20000)); // 160,000 chars: throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
Results:
| input | 2.17.4 | 2.17.7 | 2.18.0 | |---|---|---|---| | '<iframe>'.repeat(1000) | ok | ok | ok | | '<iframe>'.repeat(2000) | ok | ok | RangeError | | '<iframe>'.repeat(20000) | ok | ok | RangeError |
The threshold depends on the remaining stack, so it is lower when sanitizeHtml is called from an already deep call stack (for example inside a server-side rendering pass).
Reproduction 2: nestingLimit is bypassed
js const sanitizeHtml = require('sanitize-html');
const input = ('<iframe>' + '<b>'.repeat(3)).repeat(50) + 'x'; const out = sanitizeHtml(input, { allowedTags: ['b'], nestingLimit: 3 }); // maximum nesting depth of <b> in out: // 2.17.4: 2 2.17.7: 0 (fallback escaped as text) 2.18.0: 150
Without an iframe, the same options cap the output at three nested <b> in all three versions. With k repetitions of '<iframe>' + '<b>'.repeat(3), 2.18.0 returns 3 k nested <b> (measured for k = 1, 5, 50: depth 3, 15, 150).
Cause
In 2.18.0 the ontext handler does:
js } else if ( tag === 'iframe' && !tagAllowed(tag) && options.disallowedTagsMode === 'discard' ) { result += sanitizeHtml(text, options); }
Because htmlparser2 treats <iframe> as a raw-text element, the text of an unclosed iframe is the whole remainder of the input; re-parsing it can meet another unclosed <iframe>, and so on, one stack frame (and one full re-parse) per iframe. The nested call also starts with its own depth, so tags inside the fallback are not counted against nestingLimit together with the enclosing tags.
Possible directions
Not a patch, only what would close both effects: bound the recursion (or process the fallback without recursing), and carry the current depth into the nested sanitization so that nestingLimit applies to the whole output.
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/sanitize-htmlto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 2.18.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
sanitize-htmlto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 2.17.7
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Are applications using the default sanitizer configuration exposed?
Yes. In version 2.18.0, iframe is not allowed and disallowedTagsMode is set to discard by default, which triggers the vulnerable recursive handling.
What does an attacker need to exploit the stack-exhaustion issue?
They need to be able to supply HTML that the application passes to sanitize-html. A small crafted input containing a few kilobytes of unclosed iframe tags can cause sanitization to throw RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded.
Does configuring nestingLimit prevent the issue?
Not when nested content is processed through a discarded iframe. Each recursive sanitization call resets the depth count, allowing output to be nested arbitrarily deeply despite the configured nestingLimit.
How can I determine whether my deployment is affected?
Version 2.18.0 and the main branch at the time of the advisory are affected when an iframe is disallowed and disallowedTagsMode is discard. Versions 2.17.7 and 2.17.4 were tested with the same inputs and were not affected.