GHSA-gjj5-9665-rwrc: High severity npm/probe-image-size vulnerability

Published Oct 2, 2026
·
Updated

Overview

probe-image-size scans the SVG header with a searching regular expression, /<[-.:a-zA-Z0-9][^>]>/. On input that contains many < characters but no >, the engine restarts the [^>] scan at every < position and runs to end of input each time, giving quadratic time complexity.

Both the synchronous and the streaming parser are affected.

Impact

Every entry point that reaches the SVG parser is affected: probe.sync(), probe(stream) and probe(url). The URL form is the most exposed one — the input is fetched from a remote host, so an attacker only needs to supply a link.

Processing a crafted buffer blocks the Node.js event loop at 100% CPU for the whole duration. In production environments such as upload validators, image proxies or link unfurl services, a small number of concurrent requests is enough to deny service.

Root Cause Analysis

Two independent problems.

1. Absence of input size cap in the sync path. lib/parsesync/svg.js copied the entire buffer into a string and matched against it. There was no size limit at all, so cost scaled with the size of the attacker-supplied buffer.

2. Repeated rescanning in the stream path. lib/parsestream/svg.js did cap accumulated data at 64 KB, but called parseSvg(str) on the whole accumulated string on every chunk, giving O(chunks × N²). The cap does not help here: the more chunks the input is split into, the more times the quadratic scan is repeated.

Chunk size is influenced by the sender. highWaterMark (16 KB) is a buffering threshold, not a lower bound — a socket read returns whatever has arrived. A server that writes one byte at a time produces one-byte chunks; this was confirmed against the real needle pipeline with default options.

The original report identified (1) only, and stated that the 64 KB cap mitigates the streaming path. It does not.

Proof of Concept (PoC)

Synchronous:

js const probe = require('probe-image-size')

// ~200 KB of '<a' — contains '<' but never '>' probe.sync(Buffer.from('<a'.repeat(100000), 'latin1'))

Streaming — the same payload split into chunks, slower per byte than the synchronous form:

js const { Readable } = require('stream') const probe = require('probe-image-size')

const payload = Buffer.from('<a'.repeat(32768), 'latin1') const chunks = [] for (let i = 0; i < payload.length; i += 4096) chunks.push(payload.subarray(i, i + 4096))

await probe(Readable.from(chunks))

Measurements on the maintainer's machine:

| path | input | time | | --- | --- | --- | | probe.sync() | 25 KB | 0.9 s | | probe.sync() | 50 KB | 5.5 s | | probe.sync() | 100 KB | 18 s | | probe.sync() | 200 KB | 54 s | | probe(stream) | 64 KB, 1 chunk | 1.6 s | | probe(stream) | 64 KB, 4 chunks | 2.9 s | | probe(stream) | 64 KB, 16 chunks | 9.6 s |

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
npm/probe-image-size<=7.3.0
7.4.0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/probe-image-size to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 7.4.0

Event History

Oct 2, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·11:18 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·11:18 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are most exposed to this issue?

Services that process untrusted images or URLs are most exposed, including upload validators, image proxies, and link-unfurling services. The URL-based API is particularly exposed because an attacker can provide a remote link for the service to fetch and parse.

2

What does an attacker need to trigger the denial of service?

An attacker needs to cause the application to parse a crafted SVG containing many "<" characters without a closing ">". No authentication or user interaction is required according to the supplied severity vector.

3

Which ways of using the package are affected?

The affected SVG parsing behavior is reachable through probe.sync(), probe(stream), and probe(url). Both synchronous and streaming parsing paths are affected.

4

What is the expected runtime impact during exploitation?

Parsing a crafted buffer can consume 100% CPU and block the Node.js event loop for the duration of processing. A small number of concurrent malicious requests may be sufficient to deny service in production.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203