GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9: Npm/vm2 vulnerability

Published Aug 17, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

vm2 bufferAllocLimit cap bypassed by Buffer.concat and Buffer.from arrayLike

The bufferAllocLimit option introduced in 3.11.0 (GHSA-6785-pvv7-mvg7) caps host-side Buffer allocations driven by sandbox code, the way embedders opt into timeout. The cap wraps Buffer.alloc, Buffer.allocUnsafe, Buffer.allocUnsafeSlow, and the deprecated Buffer(N) / new Buffer(N) forms. Two other API paths reach the same host C++ allocator with an attacker-controlled size and are not capped: Buffer.concat(list, totalLength) and Buffer.from(arrayLike) with a fake length. Sandbox code can use either to allocate an arbitrary number of host external bytes in a single call, defeating the explicit DoS mitigation the embedder configured.

Details

lib/setup-sandbox.js installs checkBufferAllocLimit at every wrapped entry to host Buffer allocation:

- alloc() at lib/setup-sandbox.js:474 and the connect(alloc, host.Buffer.alloc) at line 480. - allocUnsafe() at line 488 and connect(allocUnsafe, host.Buffer.allocUnsafe) at line 496. - allocUnsafeSlow() at line 504 and connect(allocUnsafeSlow, host.Buffer.allocUnsafeSlow) at line 510. - BufferHandler.apply at line 424 and BufferHandler.construct at line 433 for the deprecated Buffer(N) / new Buffer(N) numeric-first-arg paths.

Buffer.concat is not wrapped. The sandbox-visible Buffer.concat is therefore the bridge proxy of the host Buffer.concat, which calls into Node's Buffer.allocUnsafe(totalLength) internally without going through the sandbox-side allocUnsafe wrapper. Same for Buffer.from when the argument is array-like ({length: N}): Node's fromArrayLike allocates a buffer of size N before the iteration that fills it. Neither of those allocator paths consult localBufferAllocLimit.

The mitigation rationale documented in docs/ATTACKS.md Category 23 explicitly enumerates the surfaces that were considered and either capped (Buffer.alloc family) or punted to follow-up (new Uint8Array(N), new ArrayBuffer(N), String.prototype.repeat). Buffer.concat(list, totalLength) is not listed in either group, and Buffer.from(arrayLike) is mentioned only as "bounded by source array size which had to be allocated through some other path first" -- which is not true for the {length: N} form, because no array of length N actually exists.

A single call from sandbox to Buffer.concat([Buffer.from('a')], 50 1024 1024) allocates 50 MiB of host external memory. The allocation itself is a single synchronous host C++ call that timeout cannot interrupt, exactly like the original advisory. The zero-fill that follows is interruptible, but the memory is already committed by the time the interrupt could fire, so the embedder's container memory budget is the only ceiling. The same pattern in a loop, or with a larger totalLength, drives RSS up by hundreds of megabytes per call.

The fix uses the existing checkBufferAllocLimit(size) helper and a sandbox-side wrapper installed via connect(...) -- one for Buffer.concat that sums the totalLength (or falls back to summing list lengths) and one for Buffer.from that recognises the array-like-with-numeric-length branch.

PoC

javascript 'use strict'; const { VM, NodeVM } = require('vm2');

function ext() { return Math.round(process.memoryUsage().external / 1024 / 1024); } function tryBypass(label, code) { const ext0 = ext(); let buf; try { buf = code(); } catch (e) { console.log([${label}] CAPPED -- ${String(e).split('\n')[0]}); return; } console.log([${label}] BYPASSED -- got ${buf && buf.length} bytes (external +${ext() - ext0} MB)); }

console.log('Cap is configured at 1024 bytes.\n');

const vm1 = new VM({ bufferAllocLimit: 1024 }); tryBypass('VM Buffer.alloc(50MB) ', () => vm1.run('Buffer.alloc(50 1024 1024)'));

const vm2 = new VM({ bufferAllocLimit: 1024 }); tryBypass('VM Buffer.concat 50MB ', () => vm2.run('Buffer.concat([Buffer.from("a")], 50 1024 1024)'));

const vm3 = new NodeVM({ bufferAllocLimit: 1024 }); tryBypass('NodeVM Buffer.concat 50MB ', () => vm3.run('module.exports = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from("a")], 50 1024 1024);'));

const vm4 = new VM({ bufferAllocLimit: 1024 }); tryBypass('VM Buffer.from({length: 8MB})', () => vm4.run('Buffer.from({length: 8 1024 1024})'));

Run with node poc.js against vm2@3.11.3:

Cap is configured at 1024 bytes.

[VM Buffer.alloc(50MB) ] CAPPED -- RangeError: Buffer allocation size 52428800 exceeds bufferAllocLimit 1024 [VM Buffer.concat 50MB ] BYPASSED -- got 52428800 bytes (external +50 MB) [NodeVM Buffer.concat 50MB ] BYPASSED -- got 52428800 bytes (external +50 MB) [VM Buffer.from({length: 8MB})] BYPASSED -- got 8388608 bytes (external +8 MB)

Process RSS climbs by the same amount each call, confirming a real host C++ allocation rather than a sandbox-realm-only effect.

Impact

This is the same DoS class GHSA-6785-pvv7-mvg7 was filed for: untrusted sandbox code amplifying a small payload into a large synchronous host external-memory allocation that V8's timeout cannot preempt. In the environments the advisory cites -- Docker memory limits, Kubernetes pods, AWS Lambda -- a single 200-byte sandbox payload can drive a multi-hundred-megabyte RSS jump and OOM the host process.

The Category 23 fix was specifically scoped to "cap host Buffer external allocation" and embedders are documented to opt into bufferAllocLimit as their layered defense against this class. The two paths above are uncapped, so an embedder that has configured bufferAllocLimit: 32 1024 1024 (the value recommended in the README's Hardening recommendations) is still vulnerable to the exact attack the option was designed to prevent. The mitigation invariant -- "every Buffer external allocation driven by sandbox code is capped by bufferAllocLimit" -- does not hold.

No sandbox escape; pure DoS.

Affected Software

1 affected componentFixes available
npm/vm2<=3.11.5
3.11.6

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/vm2 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.11.6

Event History

Aug 17, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·05:32 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·05:32 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9?

The severity of GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9 is rated as 62 on the vulnerability risk scale.

2

How do I fix GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9?

To fix GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9, update your vm2 package to version 3.11.6 or later.

3

What does GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9 affect?

GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9 affects the vm2 package, specifically the buffer allocation limits.

4

What are the potential consequences of GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9?

The consequence of GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9 includes the possibility of bypassing memory limits set for buffer allocations in a sandboxed environment.

5

When was GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9 published?

GHSA-gmc2-2x9w-cgh9 was published on August 17, 2026.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203