GHSA-jmqq-x5g9-9p2w: Maven/org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client vulnerability

Published Oct 8, 2026
·
Updated

Impact When a request is replayed onto a different host, the client updates only the current request and leaves the target request pointing at the original host. Four consumers read that stale value, and each one sends the first host's request, credentials, or both to the second host.

A replay happens through documented, ordinary features: a ResponseFilter that returns a different request, which is the supported failover pattern, and the IOException retry path. The attacker does not need to induce the replay; an application that uses failover produces it by design.

The socket to host B is filed in the connection pool under host A's key. A later request the application addresses to A is served over the connection to B, and A's Authorization header goes to B. Over a CONNECT tunnel, the client tunnels to B and negotiates TLS with B correctly, then writes A's request into that tunnel. B receives A's path, A's Host, and A's Authorization. TLS does not protect against this, because the handshake really is with B, so no certificate mismatch occurs. The replay reuses the original realm, so A's credentials are regenerated onto a replay request that carries no realm of its own. The cross-origin redirect path strips realms for exactly this reason; the replay path never did. The stale value also decides whether TLS is used at all. When the original request was http:// and the replay is https://, no SSL handler is installed and the replayed request, credentials included, is written in cleartext.

Affected versions 3.x: up to and including 3.0.12 2.x: up to and including 2.16.0

Both lines are affected identically. This is long-standing behaviour, not a recent regression.

Patches Fixed in 3.0.13 on the 3.x line and in 2.16.1 on the 2.x line. The target request now moves when a request is replayed, and the proxy moves with it: the proxy is part of the connection pool key, so correcting only the host would convert a harmless pool miss into a hit and route a proxied connection to a direct request.

Workarounds Do not use a ResponseFilter that replays to a different host, and disable request retries, if the client is configured with credentials or used through a proxy. Replaying to the same host is not affected.

Details NettyRequestSender.newNettyRequestAndResponseFuture calls setCurrentRequest without setTargetRequest, and replayRequest does not move the target either. The stale target is then read by the pool key derivation in NettyResponseFuture, by ConnectSuccessInterceptor when it writes the tunnelled request, by the realm selection in NettyRequestSender, and by NettyConnectListener when it decides whether to install an SSL handler.

Existing replay tests do not cover this, because all of them replay to the same host.

Affected Software

2 affected componentsFixes available
maven/org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client>=2.0.0<=2.16.0
2.16.1
maven/org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client>=3.0.0<=3.0.12
3.0.13

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade maven/org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.16.1
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade maven/org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.0.13
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.0.13
  4. Upgrade

    Upgrade to a fixed release to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.16.1
  5. Configuration

    Do not use a ResponseFilter that replays a request to a different host.

    ResponseFilter replay to a different host = disabled
  6. Configuration

    Disable request retries when the client is configured with credentials or used through a proxy.

    HTTP client request retries = disabled

Event History

Oct 8, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·04:30 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·04:30 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which applications are realistically exposed?

Applications using async-http-client features that replay a request to a different host are exposed, including the documented ResponseFilter-based failover pattern and the IOException retry path. The replay can occur as part of normal application behavior rather than requiring an attacker to trigger it.

2

What information can reach the second host during a replay?

The second host can receive a request intended for the first host, including the first host's Authorization header. With a CONNECT tunnel, it can also receive the first host's path and Host header; TLS does not prevent this because TLS is negotiated with the second host.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203