GHSA-p297-fm68-3q8c: Infoleak
A security bypass vulnerability was discovered in @angular/common when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) and hydration are enabled in applications using a hierarchical HttpClient configuration with withRequestsMadeViaParent().
The HttpTransferCache utility optimizes hydration by caching outgoing HTTP requests performed during SSR and transferring the cached state to the client-side application via TransferState (serialized as JSON in <script id="ng-state">). Following the remediation of CVE-2026-50170, HttpTransferCache automatically skips caching requests that contain authentication headers or credentials (Authorization, Cookie, withCredentials, etc.).
However, when a child HttpClient delegates to a parent client via withRequestsMadeViaParent(), the child's TransferCache interceptor evaluates whether the request is eligible for caching before delegating to the parent client's interceptor chain.
If an outgoing request originates as anonymous from the child client, the child TransferCache marks the request as cacheable. When the request reaches a parent interceptor that injects sensitive authentication credentials (such as an Authorization header or API token), the parent TransferCache correctly skips caching the authenticated request. However, when the backend returns the private, authenticated response, the child TransferCache still stores the response in TransferState based on its initial pre-delegation evaluation.
Impact
Successful exploitation allows sensitive, user-specific information belonging to an authenticated user to be leaked to unauthenticated or unauthorized users. This occurs when:
1. During SSR, a child HttpClient initiates an unauthenticated request that is subsequently authenticated by a parent interceptor. 2. The authenticated response body is cached into the SSR-rendered HTML page (TransferState). 3. The rendered HTML page is stored by a shared caching layer (e.g., CDN, edge cache, or reverse proxy) or served across user sessions. 4. Subsequent visitors requesting the same page receive the cached HTML containing the previous user's private data.
Attack Preconditions & Vulnerable Configurations
An application is affected only if all of the following conditions are met:
SSR and Hydration Enabled: The application uses Server-Side Rendering with hydration enabled (e.g., via provideClientHydration()). Hierarchical HttpClient with Delegation: The application configures a child HttpClient using withRequestsMadeViaParent(). Parent-Level Authentication Injection: Authentication credentials (such as Authorization headers, session cookies, or custom API tokens filtered via withHttpTransferCacheOptions) are attached by an interceptor in the parent injector chain rather than on the initial child request. Shared HTML Caching: The SSR HTML responses are cached by a shared caching layer (CDN, reverse proxy, or application-level HTML cache).
Vulnerable Code Pattern Example
ts // Parent Injector / Application Config export const appConfig: ApplicationConfig = { providers: [ provideHttpClient( // Parent interceptor attaches sensitive Authorization header withInterceptors([ (req, next) => next(req.clone({ setHeaders: { Authorization: Bearer ${getToken()} } })) ]) ), ], };
// Child Injector / Feature or Component Config const childClient = createEnvironmentInjector( [ // Child delegates to parent; TransferCache evaluates req BEFORE parent auth interceptor runs provideHttpClient(withRequestsMadeViaParent()), ], parentInjector ).get(HttpClient);
// Request originates without auth headers -> marked cacheable by child TransferCache childClient.get('/api/user/profile').subscribe();
Patches
The issue is resolved by updating @angular/common to run root interceptors in the terminal request chain so that delegated clients leave inherited root interceptors to the parent chain, preventing duplicate execution and ensuring HttpTransferCache evaluates cache eligibility after parent request interceptors run.
22.1.1 21.2.20 20.3.28
Workarounds & Mitigations
For applications that cannot immediately upgrade to a patched version, use one of the following mitigations:
1. Attach Credentials Before or Within the Child Client: Ensure authentication headers (e.g., Authorization) are attached directly when constructing the request or via an interceptor configured directly on the child HttpClient, rather than relying solely on parent interceptors. 2. Apply Explicit Cache Filters on the Child Client: Configure withHttpTransferCacheOptions with a filter on the child client that explicitly excludes endpoints returning user-specific or sensitive data: ts provideClientHydration( withHttpTransferCacheOptions({ filter: (req) => !req.url.includes('/api/private/'), }) ) 3. Disable HTTP Transfer Cache for Sensitive Routes: If specific SSR routes handle user-authenticated data, disable transfer caching for those requests or ensure the SSR response sets Cache-Control: no-store / private headers at your edge/CDN layer so personalized HTML is never shared.
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/@angular/commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 20.3.28 - Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/@angular/commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 21.2.20 - Upgrade
Upgrade
npm/@angular/commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 22.1.1 - Upgrade
Upgrade
@angular/commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 20.3.28 - Upgrade
Upgrade
@angular/commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 21.2.20 - Upgrade
Upgrade
@angular/commonto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 22.1.1 - Configuration
Configure the child client’s withHttpTransferCacheOptions with a filter that explicitly excludes endpoints returning user-specific or sensitive data (e.g., use a filter that excludes '/api/private/'-style routes).
HttpTransferCache (child HttpClient) withHttpTransferCacheOptions (filter) = filter out endpoints returning user-specific or sensitive data - Configuration
Ensure authentication headers such as 'Authorization' are attached directly when constructing the request or via an interceptor configured directly on the child HttpClient, rather than relying solely on parent interceptors that run after delegation.
HttpClient (child HttpClient) Credential attachment location = Attach authentication headers on the child request (or via an interceptor configured directly on the child HttpClient) - Compensating control
For SSR routes that return user-authenticated data, disable HTTP transfer caching for those routes or ensure the SSR response includes Cache-Control headers ('no-store' or 'private') at your edge/CDN layer so personalized HTML is not shared across users.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Which applications are exposed to this issue?
Applications are exposed when SSR and hydration are enabled and a child HttpClient uses withRequestsMadeViaParent() to delegate requests to a parent client. The relevant request must appear anonymous at the child client but receive authentication headers or credentials from an interceptor in the parent client.
What can an attacker obtain if the issue is exploited?
Responses to requests that become authenticated in the parent interceptor chain can be placed in HttpTransferCache. That cached state is serialized into the page's <script id="ng-state"> TransferState payload and sent to the client, potentially disclosing information from those responses.
How can I determine whether an application has been affected?
Review hierarchical HttpClient configuration for child clients using withRequestsMadeViaParent() and parent interceptors that add Authorization, Cookie, withCredentials, or other credentials. Inspect SSR-rendered responses for the ng-state script and determine whether it contains cached data from requests that should have been treated as authenticated.