GHSA-p7v4-vr35-mj6f: High severity go/github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 vulnerability

Published Oct 15, 2026
·
Updated

Impact

A vulnerability in containerd's CRI implementation allows a container restored from an untrusted checkpoint via the CreateContainer API to bypass the destination security context and execute with elevated privileges. When restoring a container from a checkpoint archive or annotated OCI image, CRIU restores process credentials, Linux capabilities, nonewprivs, and seccomp state directly from checkpoint data rather than enforcing the destination CRI ContainerConfig. An attacker who can run a container with a crafted checkpoint image can execute processes as root with full capabilities and no enforced seccomp filters despite restrictive security policies requested by the orchestrator. Additionally, containerd's CRI status reporting reflects the requested configuration rather than the actual restored process state, masking the privilege discrepancy from orchestrators. This issue affects Linux systems running containerd with CRI checkpoint restore enabled; users not utilizing CRI checkpoint restore are not affected.

Patches

This bug has been addressed in containerd 2.2.7 and 2.3.4 by disabling checkpoint restore via CreateContainer by default. The feature has been removed entirely in containerd 2.4.0. Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue. Running containers that were restored from untrusted checkpoints should be stopped, deleted, and recreated.

Users who rely on restore via the CreateContainer API can re-enable the feature by setting the new enableexperimentalrestoreviacreate configuration option. However, enabling restore via CreateContainer leaves this vulnerability present, as containerd cannot enforce destination security policy during CRIU process restoration.

Workarounds

On unpatched versions, containerd does not provide a configuration option to disable checkpoint restore via CreateContainer. Deployments should restrict container creation permissions to trusted users, validate container image registries, or use admission controllers to reject images containing checkpoint data.

References

CRIU image security

Credits

The containerd project would like to thank @l2yyd5 and @berkpolatCE for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the containerd security policy.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Open an issue in containerd Email us at security@containerd.io

To report a security issue in containerd: Report a new vulnerability Email us at security@containerd.io

Affected Software

2 affected componentsFixes available
go/github.com/containerd/containerd/v2>=2.3.0<2.3.4
2.3.4
go/github.com/containerd/containerd/v2>=2.1.0<2.2.7
2.2.7

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade go/github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.3.4
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade go/github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.2.7
  3. Upgrade

    Upgrade containerd to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.2.7
  4. Upgrade

    Upgrade containerd to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.3.4
  5. Upgrade

    Upgrade containerd to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 2.4.0
  6. Compensating control

    Restrict container creation permissions to trusted users, validate container image registries, or use admission controllers to reject images containing checkpoint data.

  7. Operational

    Stop, delete, and recreate running containers that were restored from untrusted checkpoints.

Event History

Oct 15, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·08:21 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·08:21 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software

Frequently Asked Questions

1

Which deployments are exposed?

Linux systems running containerd with CRI checkpoint restore enabled are affected. Deployments that do not use CRI checkpoint restore are not affected.

2

What access does an attacker need?

An attacker needs the ability to run a container using a crafted, untrusted checkpoint image or archive restored through the CreateContainer API. The crafted checkpoint can supply restored credentials, capabilities, no_new_privs, and seccomp state.

3

Can orchestration status reveal the privilege escalation?

Not reliably. Containerd CRI status reporting can show the requested destination configuration rather than the restored process's actual privilege and seccomp state.

4

What versions address the issue?

The issue is addressed in containerd 2.2.7 and 2.3.4. These releases disable checkpoint restore through CreateContainer by default.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203